Cargando…

Antiviral Combination Clinically Better Than Standard Therapy in Severe but Not in Non-Severe COVID-19

PURPOSE: Definitive antiviral treatment is not available for COVID-19 infection, with the exception of remdesivir, which still evokes many doubts. Various monotherapy or combination therapies with antivirals or other agents have been tried. The present study aims to evaluate the therapeutic potentia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panda, Prasan Kumar, Singh, Budha O, Moirangthem, Bikram, Bahurupi, Yogesh Arvind, Saha, Sarama, Saini, Girraj, Dhar, Minakshi, Bairwa, Mukesh, Pai, Venkatesh Srinivasa, Agarwal, Ankit, Sindhwani, Girish, Handu, Shailendra, Kant, Ravi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616188
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S325083
_version_ 1784578043476443136
author Panda, Prasan Kumar
Singh, Budha O
Moirangthem, Bikram
Bahurupi, Yogesh Arvind
Saha, Sarama
Saini, Girraj
Dhar, Minakshi
Bairwa, Mukesh
Pai, Venkatesh Srinivasa
Agarwal, Ankit
Sindhwani, Girish
Handu, Shailendra
Kant, Ravi
author_facet Panda, Prasan Kumar
Singh, Budha O
Moirangthem, Bikram
Bahurupi, Yogesh Arvind
Saha, Sarama
Saini, Girraj
Dhar, Minakshi
Bairwa, Mukesh
Pai, Venkatesh Srinivasa
Agarwal, Ankit
Sindhwani, Girish
Handu, Shailendra
Kant, Ravi
author_sort Panda, Prasan Kumar
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Definitive antiviral treatment is not available for COVID-19 infection, with the exception of remdesivir, which still evokes many doubts. Various monotherapy or combination therapies with antivirals or other agents have been tried. The present study aims to evaluate the therapeutic potential of hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir–ritonavir in combination with ribavirin in mild–severe COVID-19. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-center, open-label, parallel-arm, stratified randomized controlled trial evaluated the therapeutic potential of combination antiviral therapies. Enrolled patients in the severe category were randomized into three groups: (A) standard treatment, (B) hydroxychloroquine+ribavirin+standard treatment, or (C) lopinavir+ritonavir+ribavirin+standard treatment; while the non-severe category comprised two groups: (A) standard treatment or (B) hydroxychloroquine+ribavirin. Combination antivirals were given for 10 days and followed for 28 days. The primary endpoints were safety, symptomatic and laboratory recovery of organ dysfunctions, and time to SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR negative report. RESULTS: In total, 111 patients were randomized: 24, 23, and 24 in severe categories A, B, and C, respectively, and 20 in each of the non-severe groups. Two patients receiving ribavirin experienced drug induced liver injury, and another developed QT prolongation after hydroxychloroquine. In the severe category, 47.6%, 55%, and 30.09% in A, B, and C groups, respectively, showed symptomatic recovery, compared to 93.3% and 86.7% in A and B groups, respectively, in the non-severe category at 72 hours (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Though the results failed to show statistical superiority of the antiviral combination therapies to that of the standard therapy in both the severe and non-severe categories in symptomatic adult patients of COVID-19 due to very small sized trial, clinically hydroxychloroquine+ribavirin therapy is showing better recovery by 7.4% than standard therapy in the former category. However, results do indicate the benefit of standard therapy in the non-severe category by 6.6%. Furthermore, the dose of ribavirin needs to be reconsidered in the Indian population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8487855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84878552021-10-05 Antiviral Combination Clinically Better Than Standard Therapy in Severe but Not in Non-Severe COVID-19 Panda, Prasan Kumar Singh, Budha O Moirangthem, Bikram Bahurupi, Yogesh Arvind Saha, Sarama Saini, Girraj Dhar, Minakshi Bairwa, Mukesh Pai, Venkatesh Srinivasa Agarwal, Ankit Sindhwani, Girish Handu, Shailendra Kant, Ravi Clin Pharmacol Original Research PURPOSE: Definitive antiviral treatment is not available for COVID-19 infection, with the exception of remdesivir, which still evokes many doubts. Various monotherapy or combination therapies with antivirals or other agents have been tried. The present study aims to evaluate the therapeutic potential of hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir–ritonavir in combination with ribavirin in mild–severe COVID-19. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-center, open-label, parallel-arm, stratified randomized controlled trial evaluated the therapeutic potential of combination antiviral therapies. Enrolled patients in the severe category were randomized into three groups: (A) standard treatment, (B) hydroxychloroquine+ribavirin+standard treatment, or (C) lopinavir+ritonavir+ribavirin+standard treatment; while the non-severe category comprised two groups: (A) standard treatment or (B) hydroxychloroquine+ribavirin. Combination antivirals were given for 10 days and followed for 28 days. The primary endpoints were safety, symptomatic and laboratory recovery of organ dysfunctions, and time to SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR negative report. RESULTS: In total, 111 patients were randomized: 24, 23, and 24 in severe categories A, B, and C, respectively, and 20 in each of the non-severe groups. Two patients receiving ribavirin experienced drug induced liver injury, and another developed QT prolongation after hydroxychloroquine. In the severe category, 47.6%, 55%, and 30.09% in A, B, and C groups, respectively, showed symptomatic recovery, compared to 93.3% and 86.7% in A and B groups, respectively, in the non-severe category at 72 hours (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Though the results failed to show statistical superiority of the antiviral combination therapies to that of the standard therapy in both the severe and non-severe categories in symptomatic adult patients of COVID-19 due to very small sized trial, clinically hydroxychloroquine+ribavirin therapy is showing better recovery by 7.4% than standard therapy in the former category. However, results do indicate the benefit of standard therapy in the non-severe category by 6.6%. Furthermore, the dose of ribavirin needs to be reconsidered in the Indian population. Dove 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8487855/ /pubmed/34616188 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S325083 Text en © 2021 Panda et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Panda, Prasan Kumar
Singh, Budha O
Moirangthem, Bikram
Bahurupi, Yogesh Arvind
Saha, Sarama
Saini, Girraj
Dhar, Minakshi
Bairwa, Mukesh
Pai, Venkatesh Srinivasa
Agarwal, Ankit
Sindhwani, Girish
Handu, Shailendra
Kant, Ravi
Antiviral Combination Clinically Better Than Standard Therapy in Severe but Not in Non-Severe COVID-19
title Antiviral Combination Clinically Better Than Standard Therapy in Severe but Not in Non-Severe COVID-19
title_full Antiviral Combination Clinically Better Than Standard Therapy in Severe but Not in Non-Severe COVID-19
title_fullStr Antiviral Combination Clinically Better Than Standard Therapy in Severe but Not in Non-Severe COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Antiviral Combination Clinically Better Than Standard Therapy in Severe but Not in Non-Severe COVID-19
title_short Antiviral Combination Clinically Better Than Standard Therapy in Severe but Not in Non-Severe COVID-19
title_sort antiviral combination clinically better than standard therapy in severe but not in non-severe covid-19
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616188
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S325083
work_keys_str_mv AT pandaprasankumar antiviralcombinationclinicallybetterthanstandardtherapyinseverebutnotinnonseverecovid19
AT singhbudhao antiviralcombinationclinicallybetterthanstandardtherapyinseverebutnotinnonseverecovid19
AT moirangthembikram antiviralcombinationclinicallybetterthanstandardtherapyinseverebutnotinnonseverecovid19
AT bahurupiyogesharvind antiviralcombinationclinicallybetterthanstandardtherapyinseverebutnotinnonseverecovid19
AT sahasarama antiviralcombinationclinicallybetterthanstandardtherapyinseverebutnotinnonseverecovid19
AT sainigirraj antiviralcombinationclinicallybetterthanstandardtherapyinseverebutnotinnonseverecovid19
AT dharminakshi antiviralcombinationclinicallybetterthanstandardtherapyinseverebutnotinnonseverecovid19
AT bairwamukesh antiviralcombinationclinicallybetterthanstandardtherapyinseverebutnotinnonseverecovid19
AT paivenkateshsrinivasa antiviralcombinationclinicallybetterthanstandardtherapyinseverebutnotinnonseverecovid19
AT agarwalankit antiviralcombinationclinicallybetterthanstandardtherapyinseverebutnotinnonseverecovid19
AT sindhwanigirish antiviralcombinationclinicallybetterthanstandardtherapyinseverebutnotinnonseverecovid19
AT handushailendra antiviralcombinationclinicallybetterthanstandardtherapyinseverebutnotinnonseverecovid19
AT kantravi antiviralcombinationclinicallybetterthanstandardtherapyinseverebutnotinnonseverecovid19