Cargando…

Dogmas, challenges, and promises in phase III allergen immunotherapy studies()

The concept of treatment of an allergy with the offending allergen was introduced more than a century ago. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease modifying treatment of allergic diseases caused by inhalational allergens and insect venoms. Despite this, only few AIT products have reached li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Kam, Pieter-Jan, Kramer, Matthias F., Shamji, Mohamed H., Oluwayi, Kemi, Heath, Matthew D., Jensen-Jarolim, Erika, Berger, Markus H., Berger, Uwe E., Graessel, Anke, Sellwood, Fiona, Zielen, Stefan, Vogelberg, Christian, Zieglmayer, Petra, Mösges, Ralph, Klimek, Ludger, DuBuske, Lawrence M., Shreffler, Wayne G., Bernstein, Jonathan A., Kündig, Thomas M., Skinner, Murray A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: World Allergy Organization 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34659627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100578
_version_ 1784578056287944704
author De Kam, Pieter-Jan
Kramer, Matthias F.
Shamji, Mohamed H.
Oluwayi, Kemi
Heath, Matthew D.
Jensen-Jarolim, Erika
Berger, Markus H.
Berger, Uwe E.
Graessel, Anke
Sellwood, Fiona
Zielen, Stefan
Vogelberg, Christian
Zieglmayer, Petra
Mösges, Ralph
Klimek, Ludger
DuBuske, Lawrence M.
Shreffler, Wayne G.
Bernstein, Jonathan A.
Kündig, Thomas M.
Skinner, Murray A.
author_facet De Kam, Pieter-Jan
Kramer, Matthias F.
Shamji, Mohamed H.
Oluwayi, Kemi
Heath, Matthew D.
Jensen-Jarolim, Erika
Berger, Markus H.
Berger, Uwe E.
Graessel, Anke
Sellwood, Fiona
Zielen, Stefan
Vogelberg, Christian
Zieglmayer, Petra
Mösges, Ralph
Klimek, Ludger
DuBuske, Lawrence M.
Shreffler, Wayne G.
Bernstein, Jonathan A.
Kündig, Thomas M.
Skinner, Murray A.
author_sort De Kam, Pieter-Jan
collection PubMed
description The concept of treatment of an allergy with the offending allergen was introduced more than a century ago. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease modifying treatment of allergic diseases caused by inhalational allergens and insect venoms. Despite this, only few AIT products have reached licensure in the US or an official marketing authorization status in European countries. Moreover, most of these AIT products are provided on an individual patient basis as named patient products (NPP) in Europe, while individualized preparations of (mixed) allergenic extract vials for subcutaneous administration (compounding) is common practice in the US. AIT products are generally considered safe and well tolerated, but the major practical clinical development challenge is to define the optimal dose and prove the efficacy and safety of these products using state-of-the art Phase II and pivotal Phase III studies. In planning Phase II-III AIT studies, a thorough understanding of the study challenges is essential (e.g. variability and non-validated status of subjective primary endpoints, limitations of pollen season definitions) and dogmas of these products (e.g., for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) trials double-blinding conditions cannot be maintained, resulting in stronger placebo responses in the active treatment group and inflated treatment effects in Phase III). There is future promise for more objective biomarker endpoints (e.g. basophil activation (CD63 and CD203c), subsets of regulatory dendritic, T and B cells, IL-10–producing group 2 innate lymphoid cells; alone or in combination) to overcome several of these dogmas and challenges; innovation in AIT clinical trials can only progress with integral biomarker research to complement the traditional endpoints in Phase II-III clinical development. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of these dogmas, challenges and recommendations based on published data, to facilitate the design of Phase III studies and improve the evidence basis of safe and effective AIT products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8487954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher World Allergy Organization
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84879542021-10-14 Dogmas, challenges, and promises in phase III allergen immunotherapy studies() De Kam, Pieter-Jan Kramer, Matthias F. Shamji, Mohamed H. Oluwayi, Kemi Heath, Matthew D. Jensen-Jarolim, Erika Berger, Markus H. Berger, Uwe E. Graessel, Anke Sellwood, Fiona Zielen, Stefan Vogelberg, Christian Zieglmayer, Petra Mösges, Ralph Klimek, Ludger DuBuske, Lawrence M. Shreffler, Wayne G. Bernstein, Jonathan A. Kündig, Thomas M. Skinner, Murray A. World Allergy Organ J Article The concept of treatment of an allergy with the offending allergen was introduced more than a century ago. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease modifying treatment of allergic diseases caused by inhalational allergens and insect venoms. Despite this, only few AIT products have reached licensure in the US or an official marketing authorization status in European countries. Moreover, most of these AIT products are provided on an individual patient basis as named patient products (NPP) in Europe, while individualized preparations of (mixed) allergenic extract vials for subcutaneous administration (compounding) is common practice in the US. AIT products are generally considered safe and well tolerated, but the major practical clinical development challenge is to define the optimal dose and prove the efficacy and safety of these products using state-of-the art Phase II and pivotal Phase III studies. In planning Phase II-III AIT studies, a thorough understanding of the study challenges is essential (e.g. variability and non-validated status of subjective primary endpoints, limitations of pollen season definitions) and dogmas of these products (e.g., for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) trials double-blinding conditions cannot be maintained, resulting in stronger placebo responses in the active treatment group and inflated treatment effects in Phase III). There is future promise for more objective biomarker endpoints (e.g. basophil activation (CD63 and CD203c), subsets of regulatory dendritic, T and B cells, IL-10–producing group 2 innate lymphoid cells; alone or in combination) to overcome several of these dogmas and challenges; innovation in AIT clinical trials can only progress with integral biomarker research to complement the traditional endpoints in Phase II-III clinical development. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of these dogmas, challenges and recommendations based on published data, to facilitate the design of Phase III studies and improve the evidence basis of safe and effective AIT products. World Allergy Organization 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8487954/ /pubmed/34659627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100578 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
De Kam, Pieter-Jan
Kramer, Matthias F.
Shamji, Mohamed H.
Oluwayi, Kemi
Heath, Matthew D.
Jensen-Jarolim, Erika
Berger, Markus H.
Berger, Uwe E.
Graessel, Anke
Sellwood, Fiona
Zielen, Stefan
Vogelberg, Christian
Zieglmayer, Petra
Mösges, Ralph
Klimek, Ludger
DuBuske, Lawrence M.
Shreffler, Wayne G.
Bernstein, Jonathan A.
Kündig, Thomas M.
Skinner, Murray A.
Dogmas, challenges, and promises in phase III allergen immunotherapy studies()
title Dogmas, challenges, and promises in phase III allergen immunotherapy studies()
title_full Dogmas, challenges, and promises in phase III allergen immunotherapy studies()
title_fullStr Dogmas, challenges, and promises in phase III allergen immunotherapy studies()
title_full_unstemmed Dogmas, challenges, and promises in phase III allergen immunotherapy studies()
title_short Dogmas, challenges, and promises in phase III allergen immunotherapy studies()
title_sort dogmas, challenges, and promises in phase iii allergen immunotherapy studies()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8487954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34659627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100578
work_keys_str_mv AT dekampieterjan dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT kramermatthiasf dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT shamjimohamedh dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT oluwayikemi dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT heathmatthewd dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT jensenjarolimerika dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT bergermarkush dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT bergeruwee dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT graesselanke dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT sellwoodfiona dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT zielenstefan dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT vogelbergchristian dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT zieglmayerpetra dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT mosgesralph dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT klimekludger dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT dubuskelawrencem dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT shrefflerwayneg dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT bernsteinjonathana dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT kundigthomasm dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies
AT skinnermurraya dogmaschallengesandpromisesinphaseiiiallergenimmunotherapystudies