Cargando…

A Guide to Basic Statistics for Educational Research

INTRODUCTION: Clinician-educators often need to produce scholarship for academic promotion. While some programs exist to help with faculty development skills, few provide adequate statistical training to help educators evaluate their work. METHODS: From January 2020 through January 2021, faculty at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Windish, Donna M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association of American Medical Colleges 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34651070
http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11187
_version_ 1784578072253562880
author Windish, Donna M.
author_facet Windish, Donna M.
author_sort Windish, Donna M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Clinician-educators often need to produce scholarship for academic promotion. While some programs exist to help with faculty development skills, few provide adequate statistical training to help educators evaluate their work. METHODS: From January 2020 through January 2021, faculty at three academic centers attended one of five in-person or virtual seminars with dedicated statistical training for medical education interventions. These 90-minute seminars included a 45-minute PowerPoint presentation of common statistical tests used for educational interventions followed by small breakout groups to help attendees work on additional practice examples. After each seminar, surveys were distributed in person or virtually to obtain feedback. RESULTS: Forty-three faculty attended the five seminars, with a range of surgical and nonsurgical specialties represented. Of these attendees, 38 (88%) completed session evaluations. The majority of respondents (n = 34, 90%) rated the session as extremely useful in helping them know how to use statistics in their scholarly work. Most participants agreed or strongly agreed they had adequate time to practice skills (n = 30, 79%). Self-rated confidence in using statistics was significantly higher after the session compared to before (3.00 post vs. 1.97 pre, p < .0001). Most participants (n = 32, 84%) rated the session as excellent and the small-group practice as most useful (n = 16, 42%), but many (n = 26, 69%) wanted more skills practice. DISCUSSION: This intervention shows that dedicated training on biostatistics used in educational interventions can help clinician-educators improve self-rated confidence and knowledge in choosing statistical tests in educational scholarship.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8488064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Association of American Medical Colleges
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84880642021-10-13 A Guide to Basic Statistics for Educational Research Windish, Donna M. MedEdPORTAL Original Publication INTRODUCTION: Clinician-educators often need to produce scholarship for academic promotion. While some programs exist to help with faculty development skills, few provide adequate statistical training to help educators evaluate their work. METHODS: From January 2020 through January 2021, faculty at three academic centers attended one of five in-person or virtual seminars with dedicated statistical training for medical education interventions. These 90-minute seminars included a 45-minute PowerPoint presentation of common statistical tests used for educational interventions followed by small breakout groups to help attendees work on additional practice examples. After each seminar, surveys were distributed in person or virtually to obtain feedback. RESULTS: Forty-three faculty attended the five seminars, with a range of surgical and nonsurgical specialties represented. Of these attendees, 38 (88%) completed session evaluations. The majority of respondents (n = 34, 90%) rated the session as extremely useful in helping them know how to use statistics in their scholarly work. Most participants agreed or strongly agreed they had adequate time to practice skills (n = 30, 79%). Self-rated confidence in using statistics was significantly higher after the session compared to before (3.00 post vs. 1.97 pre, p < .0001). Most participants (n = 32, 84%) rated the session as excellent and the small-group practice as most useful (n = 16, 42%), but many (n = 26, 69%) wanted more skills practice. DISCUSSION: This intervention shows that dedicated training on biostatistics used in educational interventions can help clinician-educators improve self-rated confidence and knowledge in choosing statistical tests in educational scholarship. Association of American Medical Colleges 2021-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8488064/ /pubmed/34651070 http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11187 Text en © 2021 Windish https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) license.
spellingShingle Original Publication
Windish, Donna M.
A Guide to Basic Statistics for Educational Research
title A Guide to Basic Statistics for Educational Research
title_full A Guide to Basic Statistics for Educational Research
title_fullStr A Guide to Basic Statistics for Educational Research
title_full_unstemmed A Guide to Basic Statistics for Educational Research
title_short A Guide to Basic Statistics for Educational Research
title_sort guide to basic statistics for educational research
topic Original Publication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34651070
http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11187
work_keys_str_mv AT windishdonnam aguidetobasicstatisticsforeducationalresearch
AT windishdonnam guidetobasicstatisticsforeducationalresearch