Cargando…

Comparison of (68)Ga-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT: In December 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration approved a (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand ((68)Ga-PSMA-11) for positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) metastasis who are candidates for initial definitive therapy. (6...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ling, Sui Wai, de Jong, Anouk C., Schoots, Ivo G., Nasserinejad, Kazem, Busstra, Martijn B., van der Veldt, Astrid A.M., Brabander, Tessa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34632423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2021.09.006
_version_ 1784578119762444288
author Ling, Sui Wai
de Jong, Anouk C.
Schoots, Ivo G.
Nasserinejad, Kazem
Busstra, Martijn B.
van der Veldt, Astrid A.M.
Brabander, Tessa
author_facet Ling, Sui Wai
de Jong, Anouk C.
Schoots, Ivo G.
Nasserinejad, Kazem
Busstra, Martijn B.
van der Veldt, Astrid A.M.
Brabander, Tessa
author_sort Ling, Sui Wai
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: In December 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration approved a (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand ((68)Ga-PSMA-11) for positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) metastasis who are candidates for initial definitive therapy. (68)Ga-PSMA PET is increasingly performed for these patients and is usually combined with computed tomography (CT). In recent years, (68)Ga-PSMA PET has been combined with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is beneficial for T staging and may further enhance the staging of primary PCa. OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/MRI with (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging of primary PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive literature search was performed using Embase, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar up to June 24, 2021 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The search identified 2632 articles, of which 27 were included. The diagnostic accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/MRI, measured as the pooled natural logarithm of diagnostic odds ratio (lnDOR), was 2.27 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–3.32) for detection of extracapsular extension (ECE), 3.50 (95% CI 2.14–4.86) for seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and 4.73 (95% CI 2.93–6.52) for lymph node metastasis (LNM). For (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT, the analysis showed lnDOR of 2.45 (95% CI 0.75–4.14), 2.94 (95% CI 2.26–3.63), and 2.42 (95% CI 2.07–2.78) for detection of ECE, SVI, and LNM, respectively. The overall risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed as moderate and low, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: (68)Ga-PSMA PET/MRI shows high diagnostic accuracy equivalent to that of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT for detection of ECE, SVI, and LNM in staging of PCa. There is an urgent need for direct comparison of the two diagnostic tests in future research. PATIENT SUMMARY: The use of radioactively labeled molecules that bind to prostate-specific membrane antigen ((68)Ga-PSMA) for positron emission tomography (PET) scans combined with either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasing for prostate cancer diagnosis. There is a need for direct comparison of the two tests to demonstrate the benefit of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/MRI for determining tumor stage in prostate cancer. TAKE  HOME MESSAGE: After the recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand ((68)Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) for staging of primary prostate cancer (PCa), it is expected that the use of this imaging modality will increase rapidly. Our review of the literature shows that (68)Ga-PSMA PET/magnetic resonance imaging has high diagnostic accuracy equivalent to that of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/computed tomography in primary PCa staging. There is an urgent need for direct head-to-head comparison of the two diagnostic tests in future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8488242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84882422021-10-08 Comparison of (68)Ga-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Ling, Sui Wai de Jong, Anouk C. Schoots, Ivo G. Nasserinejad, Kazem Busstra, Martijn B. van der Veldt, Astrid A.M. Brabander, Tessa Eur Urol Open Sci Review – Prostate Cancer CONTEXT: In December 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration approved a (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand ((68)Ga-PSMA-11) for positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) metastasis who are candidates for initial definitive therapy. (68)Ga-PSMA PET is increasingly performed for these patients and is usually combined with computed tomography (CT). In recent years, (68)Ga-PSMA PET has been combined with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is beneficial for T staging and may further enhance the staging of primary PCa. OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/MRI with (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging of primary PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive literature search was performed using Embase, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar up to June 24, 2021 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The search identified 2632 articles, of which 27 were included. The diagnostic accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/MRI, measured as the pooled natural logarithm of diagnostic odds ratio (lnDOR), was 2.27 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–3.32) for detection of extracapsular extension (ECE), 3.50 (95% CI 2.14–4.86) for seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and 4.73 (95% CI 2.93–6.52) for lymph node metastasis (LNM). For (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT, the analysis showed lnDOR of 2.45 (95% CI 0.75–4.14), 2.94 (95% CI 2.26–3.63), and 2.42 (95% CI 2.07–2.78) for detection of ECE, SVI, and LNM, respectively. The overall risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed as moderate and low, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: (68)Ga-PSMA PET/MRI shows high diagnostic accuracy equivalent to that of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT for detection of ECE, SVI, and LNM in staging of PCa. There is an urgent need for direct comparison of the two diagnostic tests in future research. PATIENT SUMMARY: The use of radioactively labeled molecules that bind to prostate-specific membrane antigen ((68)Ga-PSMA) for positron emission tomography (PET) scans combined with either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasing for prostate cancer diagnosis. There is a need for direct comparison of the two tests to demonstrate the benefit of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/MRI for determining tumor stage in prostate cancer. TAKE  HOME MESSAGE: After the recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand ((68)Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) for staging of primary prostate cancer (PCa), it is expected that the use of this imaging modality will increase rapidly. Our review of the literature shows that (68)Ga-PSMA PET/magnetic resonance imaging has high diagnostic accuracy equivalent to that of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/computed tomography in primary PCa staging. There is an urgent need for direct head-to-head comparison of the two diagnostic tests in future research. Elsevier 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8488242/ /pubmed/34632423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2021.09.006 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review – Prostate Cancer
Ling, Sui Wai
de Jong, Anouk C.
Schoots, Ivo G.
Nasserinejad, Kazem
Busstra, Martijn B.
van der Veldt, Astrid A.M.
Brabander, Tessa
Comparison of (68)Ga-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Comparison of (68)Ga-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of (68)Ga-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of (68)Ga-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of (68)Ga-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of (68)Ga-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of (68)ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for primary staging of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review – Prostate Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34632423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2021.09.006
work_keys_str_mv AT lingsuiwai comparisonof68galabeledprostatespecificmembraneantigenligandpositronemissiontomographymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyforprimarystagingofprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dejonganoukc comparisonof68galabeledprostatespecificmembraneantigenligandpositronemissiontomographymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyforprimarystagingofprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schootsivog comparisonof68galabeledprostatespecificmembraneantigenligandpositronemissiontomographymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyforprimarystagingofprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nasserinejadkazem comparisonof68galabeledprostatespecificmembraneantigenligandpositronemissiontomographymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyforprimarystagingofprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT busstramartijnb comparisonof68galabeledprostatespecificmembraneantigenligandpositronemissiontomographymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyforprimarystagingofprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanderveldtastridam comparisonof68galabeledprostatespecificmembraneantigenligandpositronemissiontomographymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyforprimarystagingofprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT brabandertessa comparisonof68galabeledprostatespecificmembraneantigenligandpositronemissiontomographymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyforprimarystagingofprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis