Cargando…
Evaluating Well-being at Community Level
OBJECTIVE: To measure well-being at a community level using a valid instrument. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Written surveys were mailed to a random sample of residents in Olmsted County, Minnesota, in 2015 and 2019 including the 5-item World Health Organization Well-being Index (0-100; for which 100 is th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34632297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.08.012 |
_version_ | 1784578174033592320 |
---|---|
author | Murad, Angela L. Sherdan, Meaghan Briggs, Graham Fritz, Derrick Wang, Zhen Murad, M. Hassan Molella, Robin G. |
author_facet | Murad, Angela L. Sherdan, Meaghan Briggs, Graham Fritz, Derrick Wang, Zhen Murad, M. Hassan Molella, Robin G. |
author_sort | Murad, Angela L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To measure well-being at a community level using a valid instrument. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Written surveys were mailed to a random sample of residents in Olmsted County, Minnesota, in 2015 and 2019 including the 5-item World Health Organization Well-being Index (0-100; for which 100 is the best imaginable well-being or quality of life). Multivariable hierarchical regression was used to evaluate the association between well-being and demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and environmental factors. RESULTS: The survey was returned by 1232 of 4000 individuals (response rate, 30.80%). The average well-being score was 70.02. Impaired well-being was identified in 223/1187 individuals (18.79%). Adjusted regression models showed that impaired well-being was independently associated with household poverty, financial stress, reduced access to medical or mental health care, ever having depression diagnosed, living in an unsafe community, or being socially isolated. CONCLUSION: One in 5 people in a county in the US Midwest have impaired well-being. Well-being was associated with several modifiable factors. Data provide a rationale for policies that align transportation and housing and create opportunities for community members to connect and interact in a safe environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8488461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84884612021-10-08 Evaluating Well-being at Community Level Murad, Angela L. Sherdan, Meaghan Briggs, Graham Fritz, Derrick Wang, Zhen Murad, M. Hassan Molella, Robin G. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Original Article OBJECTIVE: To measure well-being at a community level using a valid instrument. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Written surveys were mailed to a random sample of residents in Olmsted County, Minnesota, in 2015 and 2019 including the 5-item World Health Organization Well-being Index (0-100; for which 100 is the best imaginable well-being or quality of life). Multivariable hierarchical regression was used to evaluate the association between well-being and demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and environmental factors. RESULTS: The survey was returned by 1232 of 4000 individuals (response rate, 30.80%). The average well-being score was 70.02. Impaired well-being was identified in 223/1187 individuals (18.79%). Adjusted regression models showed that impaired well-being was independently associated with household poverty, financial stress, reduced access to medical or mental health care, ever having depression diagnosed, living in an unsafe community, or being socially isolated. CONCLUSION: One in 5 people in a county in the US Midwest have impaired well-being. Well-being was associated with several modifiable factors. Data provide a rationale for policies that align transportation and housing and create opportunities for community members to connect and interact in a safe environment. Elsevier 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8488461/ /pubmed/34632297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.08.012 Text en © 2021 THE AUTHORS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Murad, Angela L. Sherdan, Meaghan Briggs, Graham Fritz, Derrick Wang, Zhen Murad, M. Hassan Molella, Robin G. Evaluating Well-being at Community Level |
title | Evaluating Well-being at Community Level |
title_full | Evaluating Well-being at Community Level |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Well-being at Community Level |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Well-being at Community Level |
title_short | Evaluating Well-being at Community Level |
title_sort | evaluating well-being at community level |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34632297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.08.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muradangelal evaluatingwellbeingatcommunitylevel AT sherdanmeaghan evaluatingwellbeingatcommunitylevel AT briggsgraham evaluatingwellbeingatcommunitylevel AT fritzderrick evaluatingwellbeingatcommunitylevel AT wangzhen evaluatingwellbeingatcommunitylevel AT muradmhassan evaluatingwellbeingatcommunitylevel AT molellarobing evaluatingwellbeingatcommunitylevel |