Cargando…

Evaluating Well-being at Community Level

OBJECTIVE: To measure well-being at a community level using a valid instrument. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Written surveys were mailed to a random sample of residents in Olmsted County, Minnesota, in 2015 and 2019 including the 5-item World Health Organization Well-being Index (0-100; for which 100 is th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murad, Angela L., Sherdan, Meaghan, Briggs, Graham, Fritz, Derrick, Wang, Zhen, Murad, M. Hassan, Molella, Robin G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34632297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.08.012
_version_ 1784578174033592320
author Murad, Angela L.
Sherdan, Meaghan
Briggs, Graham
Fritz, Derrick
Wang, Zhen
Murad, M. Hassan
Molella, Robin G.
author_facet Murad, Angela L.
Sherdan, Meaghan
Briggs, Graham
Fritz, Derrick
Wang, Zhen
Murad, M. Hassan
Molella, Robin G.
author_sort Murad, Angela L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To measure well-being at a community level using a valid instrument. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Written surveys were mailed to a random sample of residents in Olmsted County, Minnesota, in 2015 and 2019 including the 5-item World Health Organization Well-being Index (0-100; for which 100 is the best imaginable well-being or quality of life). Multivariable hierarchical regression was used to evaluate the association between well-being and demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and environmental factors. RESULTS: The survey was returned by 1232 of 4000 individuals (response rate, 30.80%). The average well-being score was 70.02. Impaired well-being was identified in 223/1187 individuals (18.79%). Adjusted regression models showed that impaired well-being was independently associated with household poverty, financial stress, reduced access to medical or mental health care, ever having depression diagnosed, living in an unsafe community, or being socially isolated. CONCLUSION: One in 5 people in a county in the US Midwest have impaired well-being. Well-being was associated with several modifiable factors. Data provide a rationale for policies that align transportation and housing and create opportunities for community members to connect and interact in a safe environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8488461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84884612021-10-08 Evaluating Well-being at Community Level Murad, Angela L. Sherdan, Meaghan Briggs, Graham Fritz, Derrick Wang, Zhen Murad, M. Hassan Molella, Robin G. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Original Article OBJECTIVE: To measure well-being at a community level using a valid instrument. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Written surveys were mailed to a random sample of residents in Olmsted County, Minnesota, in 2015 and 2019 including the 5-item World Health Organization Well-being Index (0-100; for which 100 is the best imaginable well-being or quality of life). Multivariable hierarchical regression was used to evaluate the association between well-being and demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and environmental factors. RESULTS: The survey was returned by 1232 of 4000 individuals (response rate, 30.80%). The average well-being score was 70.02. Impaired well-being was identified in 223/1187 individuals (18.79%). Adjusted regression models showed that impaired well-being was independently associated with household poverty, financial stress, reduced access to medical or mental health care, ever having depression diagnosed, living in an unsafe community, or being socially isolated. CONCLUSION: One in 5 people in a county in the US Midwest have impaired well-being. Well-being was associated with several modifiable factors. Data provide a rationale for policies that align transportation and housing and create opportunities for community members to connect and interact in a safe environment. Elsevier 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8488461/ /pubmed/34632297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.08.012 Text en © 2021 THE AUTHORS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Murad, Angela L.
Sherdan, Meaghan
Briggs, Graham
Fritz, Derrick
Wang, Zhen
Murad, M. Hassan
Molella, Robin G.
Evaluating Well-being at Community Level
title Evaluating Well-being at Community Level
title_full Evaluating Well-being at Community Level
title_fullStr Evaluating Well-being at Community Level
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Well-being at Community Level
title_short Evaluating Well-being at Community Level
title_sort evaluating well-being at community level
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34632297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.08.012
work_keys_str_mv AT muradangelal evaluatingwellbeingatcommunitylevel
AT sherdanmeaghan evaluatingwellbeingatcommunitylevel
AT briggsgraham evaluatingwellbeingatcommunitylevel
AT fritzderrick evaluatingwellbeingatcommunitylevel
AT wangzhen evaluatingwellbeingatcommunitylevel
AT muradmhassan evaluatingwellbeingatcommunitylevel
AT molellarobing evaluatingwellbeingatcommunitylevel