Cargando…

Population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of maintenance PARP inhibitor with or without bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone in women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND: In patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, bevacizumab and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, alone or in combination, have shown benefit as maintenance treatment following platinum-based chemotherapy. However, no trials have compared a PARP inhibitor plus bevacizumab v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hettle, Robert, McCrea, Charles, Lee, Chee Khoon, Davidson, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359211049639
_version_ 1784578183910129664
author Hettle, Robert
McCrea, Charles
Lee, Chee Khoon
Davidson, Richard
author_facet Hettle, Robert
McCrea, Charles
Lee, Chee Khoon
Davidson, Richard
author_sort Hettle, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, bevacizumab and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, alone or in combination, have shown benefit as maintenance treatment following platinum-based chemotherapy. However, no trials have compared a PARP inhibitor plus bevacizumab versus a PARP inhibitor, or a PARP inhibitor versus bevacizumab. We performed an unanchored population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of maintenance treatments for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: Analyses were performed using aggregate data from the PRIMA trial and patient-level data from a subset of patients from the PAOLA-1 trial that met surgery and staging eligibility criteria of PRIMA. Propensity weights were used to match baseline characteristics of the PAOLA-1 subset to those of the PRIMA population. Analysis was performed in overall (biomarker-unselected) and homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD)-positive populations. RESULTS: A total of 595/806 (266/387 HRD-positive) PAOLA-1 patients were included. After matching, the effective sample size for PAOLA-1 was 532 (242 HRD-positive). Maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 43% [hazard ratio (HR) 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47–0.69] versus niraparib and by 40% (HR 0.60; 95% CI: 0.49–0.74) versus bevacizumab in the biomarker-unselected population and by 43% (HR 0.57; 95% CI: 0.41–0.79) and 60% (HR 0.40; 95% CI: 0.29–0.55), respectively, in the HRD-positive population. Progression-free survival (PFS) benefits of maintenance niraparib and bevacizumab arms were comparable in the biomarker-unselected population (HR 1.07; 95% CI: 0.87–1.32); however, niraparib showed a 30% reduced risk compared with bevacizumab (HR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51–0.97) in the HRD-positive population. CONCLUSIONS: In biomarker-unselected and HRD-positive patients, combination treatment with olaparib plus bevacizumab as maintenance treatment improves PFS for women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer compared with either bevacizumab or niraparib alone. Results are hypothesis generating and could guide randomised trial design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8488507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84885072021-10-05 Population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of maintenance PARP inhibitor with or without bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone in women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer Hettle, Robert McCrea, Charles Lee, Chee Khoon Davidson, Richard Ther Adv Med Oncol Original Research BACKGROUND: In patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, bevacizumab and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, alone or in combination, have shown benefit as maintenance treatment following platinum-based chemotherapy. However, no trials have compared a PARP inhibitor plus bevacizumab versus a PARP inhibitor, or a PARP inhibitor versus bevacizumab. We performed an unanchored population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of maintenance treatments for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: Analyses were performed using aggregate data from the PRIMA trial and patient-level data from a subset of patients from the PAOLA-1 trial that met surgery and staging eligibility criteria of PRIMA. Propensity weights were used to match baseline characteristics of the PAOLA-1 subset to those of the PRIMA population. Analysis was performed in overall (biomarker-unselected) and homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD)-positive populations. RESULTS: A total of 595/806 (266/387 HRD-positive) PAOLA-1 patients were included. After matching, the effective sample size for PAOLA-1 was 532 (242 HRD-positive). Maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 43% [hazard ratio (HR) 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47–0.69] versus niraparib and by 40% (HR 0.60; 95% CI: 0.49–0.74) versus bevacizumab in the biomarker-unselected population and by 43% (HR 0.57; 95% CI: 0.41–0.79) and 60% (HR 0.40; 95% CI: 0.29–0.55), respectively, in the HRD-positive population. Progression-free survival (PFS) benefits of maintenance niraparib and bevacizumab arms were comparable in the biomarker-unselected population (HR 1.07; 95% CI: 0.87–1.32); however, niraparib showed a 30% reduced risk compared with bevacizumab (HR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51–0.97) in the HRD-positive population. CONCLUSIONS: In biomarker-unselected and HRD-positive patients, combination treatment with olaparib plus bevacizumab as maintenance treatment improves PFS for women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer compared with either bevacizumab or niraparib alone. Results are hypothesis generating and could guide randomised trial design. SAGE Publications 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8488507/ /pubmed/34616492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359211049639 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Hettle, Robert
McCrea, Charles
Lee, Chee Khoon
Davidson, Richard
Population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of maintenance PARP inhibitor with or without bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone in women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer
title Population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of maintenance PARP inhibitor with or without bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone in women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer
title_full Population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of maintenance PARP inhibitor with or without bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone in women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer
title_fullStr Population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of maintenance PARP inhibitor with or without bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone in women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed Population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of maintenance PARP inhibitor with or without bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone in women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer
title_short Population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of maintenance PARP inhibitor with or without bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone in women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer
title_sort population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of maintenance parp inhibitor with or without bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone in women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359211049639
work_keys_str_mv AT hettlerobert populationadjustedindirecttreatmentcomparisonofmaintenanceparpinhibitorwithorwithoutbevacizumabversusbevacizumabaloneinwomenwithnewlydiagnosedadvancedovariancancer
AT mccreacharles populationadjustedindirecttreatmentcomparisonofmaintenanceparpinhibitorwithorwithoutbevacizumabversusbevacizumabaloneinwomenwithnewlydiagnosedadvancedovariancancer
AT leecheekhoon populationadjustedindirecttreatmentcomparisonofmaintenanceparpinhibitorwithorwithoutbevacizumabversusbevacizumabaloneinwomenwithnewlydiagnosedadvancedovariancancer
AT davidsonrichard populationadjustedindirecttreatmentcomparisonofmaintenanceparpinhibitorwithorwithoutbevacizumabversusbevacizumabaloneinwomenwithnewlydiagnosedadvancedovariancancer