Cargando…
Benefit of second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a tri-center propensity score analysis
BACKGROUND: The level of evidence for palliative second-line therapy in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (aESCC) is limited. This is the first study that reports efficacy data comparing second-line therapy + active symptom control (ASC) versus ASC alone in aESCC. METHODS: We conducted a t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359211039930 |
_version_ | 1784578184181710848 |
---|---|
author | Müller, Moritz Posch, Florian Kiem, Dominik Barth, Dominik Horvath, Lena Stotz, Michael Schaberl-Moser, Renate Pichler, Martin Greil, Richard Jost, Philipp J. Seeber, Andreas Amann, Arno Schlick, Konstantin Gerger, Armin Riedl, Jakob M. |
author_facet | Müller, Moritz Posch, Florian Kiem, Dominik Barth, Dominik Horvath, Lena Stotz, Michael Schaberl-Moser, Renate Pichler, Martin Greil, Richard Jost, Philipp J. Seeber, Andreas Amann, Arno Schlick, Konstantin Gerger, Armin Riedl, Jakob M. |
author_sort | Müller, Moritz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The level of evidence for palliative second-line therapy in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (aESCC) is limited. This is the first study that reports efficacy data comparing second-line therapy + active symptom control (ASC) versus ASC alone in aESCC. METHODS: We conducted a tri-center retrospective cohort study (n = 166) including patients with aESCC who had experienced disease progression on palliative first-line therapy. A propensity score model using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was implemented for comparative efficacy analysis of overall survival (OS) in patients with second-line + ASC (n = 92, 55%) versus ASC alone (n = 74, 45%). RESULTS: The most frequent second-line regimens used were docetaxel (36%) and paclitaxel (18%). In unadjusted primary endpoint analysis, second-line + ASC was associated with significantly longer OS compared with ASC alone [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.35–0.69, p < 0.0001]. However, patients in the second-line + ASC group were characterized by more favorable baseline features including a better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, a longer first-line treatment duration and lower C-reactive protein levels. After rigorous adjusting for baseline confounders by re-weighting the data with the IPTW the favorable association between second-line and longer OS weakened but prevailed. The median OS was 6.1 months in the second-line + ASC group and 3.2 months in the ASC group, respectively (IPTW-adjusted HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24–0.69, p = 0.001). Importantly, the benefit of second-line was consistent across several clinical subgroups, including patients with ECOG performance status ⩾1 and age ⩾65 years. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events associated with palliative second-line therapy were hematological toxicities. CONCLUSION: This real-world study supports the concept that systemic second-line therapy prolongs survival in patients with aESCC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8488508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84885082021-10-05 Benefit of second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a tri-center propensity score analysis Müller, Moritz Posch, Florian Kiem, Dominik Barth, Dominik Horvath, Lena Stotz, Michael Schaberl-Moser, Renate Pichler, Martin Greil, Richard Jost, Philipp J. Seeber, Andreas Amann, Arno Schlick, Konstantin Gerger, Armin Riedl, Jakob M. Ther Adv Med Oncol Original Research BACKGROUND: The level of evidence for palliative second-line therapy in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (aESCC) is limited. This is the first study that reports efficacy data comparing second-line therapy + active symptom control (ASC) versus ASC alone in aESCC. METHODS: We conducted a tri-center retrospective cohort study (n = 166) including patients with aESCC who had experienced disease progression on palliative first-line therapy. A propensity score model using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was implemented for comparative efficacy analysis of overall survival (OS) in patients with second-line + ASC (n = 92, 55%) versus ASC alone (n = 74, 45%). RESULTS: The most frequent second-line regimens used were docetaxel (36%) and paclitaxel (18%). In unadjusted primary endpoint analysis, second-line + ASC was associated with significantly longer OS compared with ASC alone [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.35–0.69, p < 0.0001]. However, patients in the second-line + ASC group were characterized by more favorable baseline features including a better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, a longer first-line treatment duration and lower C-reactive protein levels. After rigorous adjusting for baseline confounders by re-weighting the data with the IPTW the favorable association between second-line and longer OS weakened but prevailed. The median OS was 6.1 months in the second-line + ASC group and 3.2 months in the ASC group, respectively (IPTW-adjusted HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24–0.69, p = 0.001). Importantly, the benefit of second-line was consistent across several clinical subgroups, including patients with ECOG performance status ⩾1 and age ⩾65 years. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events associated with palliative second-line therapy were hematological toxicities. CONCLUSION: This real-world study supports the concept that systemic second-line therapy prolongs survival in patients with aESCC. SAGE Publications 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8488508/ /pubmed/34616490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359211039930 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Müller, Moritz Posch, Florian Kiem, Dominik Barth, Dominik Horvath, Lena Stotz, Michael Schaberl-Moser, Renate Pichler, Martin Greil, Richard Jost, Philipp J. Seeber, Andreas Amann, Arno Schlick, Konstantin Gerger, Armin Riedl, Jakob M. Benefit of second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a tri-center propensity score analysis |
title | Benefit of second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a tri-center propensity score analysis |
title_full | Benefit of second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a tri-center propensity score analysis |
title_fullStr | Benefit of second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a tri-center propensity score analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Benefit of second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a tri-center propensity score analysis |
title_short | Benefit of second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a tri-center propensity score analysis |
title_sort | benefit of second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a tri-center propensity score analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359211039930 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullermoritz benefitofsecondlinetherapyforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaatricenterpropensityscoreanalysis AT poschflorian benefitofsecondlinetherapyforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaatricenterpropensityscoreanalysis AT kiemdominik benefitofsecondlinetherapyforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaatricenterpropensityscoreanalysis AT barthdominik benefitofsecondlinetherapyforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaatricenterpropensityscoreanalysis AT horvathlena benefitofsecondlinetherapyforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaatricenterpropensityscoreanalysis AT stotzmichael benefitofsecondlinetherapyforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaatricenterpropensityscoreanalysis AT schaberlmoserrenate benefitofsecondlinetherapyforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaatricenterpropensityscoreanalysis AT pichlermartin benefitofsecondlinetherapyforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaatricenterpropensityscoreanalysis AT greilrichard benefitofsecondlinetherapyforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaatricenterpropensityscoreanalysis AT jostphilippj benefitofsecondlinetherapyforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaatricenterpropensityscoreanalysis AT seeberandreas benefitofsecondlinetherapyforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaatricenterpropensityscoreanalysis AT amannarno benefitofsecondlinetherapyforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaatricenterpropensityscoreanalysis AT schlickkonstantin benefitofsecondlinetherapyforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaatricenterpropensityscoreanalysis AT gergerarmin benefitofsecondlinetherapyforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaatricenterpropensityscoreanalysis AT riedljakobm benefitofsecondlinetherapyforadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaatricenterpropensityscoreanalysis |