Cargando…

Soluble biological markers in osteoarthritis

In recent years, markers research has focused on the structural components of cartilage matrix. Specifically, a second generation of degradation markers has been developed against type II collagen neoepitopes generated by specific enzymes. A particular effort has been made to measure the degradation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rousseau, Jean-Charles, Chapurlat, Roland, Garnero, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X211040300
_version_ 1784578186150936576
author Rousseau, Jean-Charles
Chapurlat, Roland
Garnero, Patrick
author_facet Rousseau, Jean-Charles
Chapurlat, Roland
Garnero, Patrick
author_sort Rousseau, Jean-Charles
collection PubMed
description In recent years, markers research has focused on the structural components of cartilage matrix. Specifically, a second generation of degradation markers has been developed against type II collagen neoepitopes generated by specific enzymes. A particular effort has been made to measure the degradation of minor collagens III and X of the cartilage matrix. However, because clinical data, including longitudinal controlled studies, are very scarce, it remains unclear whether they will be useful as an alternative to or in combination with current more established collagen biological markers to assess patients with osteoarthritis (OA). In addition, new approaches using high-throughput technologies allowed to detect new types of markers and improve the knowledge about the metabolic changes linked to OA. The relative advances coming from phenotype research are a first attempt to classify the heterogeneity of OA, and several markers could improve the phenotype characterization. These phenotypes could improve the selection of patients in clinical trials limiting the size of the studies by selecting patients with OA characteristics corresponding to the metabolic pathway targeted by the molecules evaluated. In addition, the inclusion of rapid progressors only in clinical trials would facilitate the demonstration of efficacy of the investigative drug to reduce joint degradation. The combination of selective biochemical markers appears as a promising and cost-effective approach to fulfill this unmet clinical need. Among the various potential roles of biomarkers in OA, their ability to monitor drug efficacy is probably one of the most important, in association with clinical and imaging parameters. Biochemical markers have the unique property to detect changes in joint tissue metabolism within a few weeks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8488516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84885162021-10-05 Soluble biological markers in osteoarthritis Rousseau, Jean-Charles Chapurlat, Roland Garnero, Patrick Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis Review In recent years, markers research has focused on the structural components of cartilage matrix. Specifically, a second generation of degradation markers has been developed against type II collagen neoepitopes generated by specific enzymes. A particular effort has been made to measure the degradation of minor collagens III and X of the cartilage matrix. However, because clinical data, including longitudinal controlled studies, are very scarce, it remains unclear whether they will be useful as an alternative to or in combination with current more established collagen biological markers to assess patients with osteoarthritis (OA). In addition, new approaches using high-throughput technologies allowed to detect new types of markers and improve the knowledge about the metabolic changes linked to OA. The relative advances coming from phenotype research are a first attempt to classify the heterogeneity of OA, and several markers could improve the phenotype characterization. These phenotypes could improve the selection of patients in clinical trials limiting the size of the studies by selecting patients with OA characteristics corresponding to the metabolic pathway targeted by the molecules evaluated. In addition, the inclusion of rapid progressors only in clinical trials would facilitate the demonstration of efficacy of the investigative drug to reduce joint degradation. The combination of selective biochemical markers appears as a promising and cost-effective approach to fulfill this unmet clinical need. Among the various potential roles of biomarkers in OA, their ability to monitor drug efficacy is probably one of the most important, in association with clinical and imaging parameters. Biochemical markers have the unique property to detect changes in joint tissue metabolism within a few weeks. SAGE Publications 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8488516/ /pubmed/34616494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X211040300 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Rousseau, Jean-Charles
Chapurlat, Roland
Garnero, Patrick
Soluble biological markers in osteoarthritis
title Soluble biological markers in osteoarthritis
title_full Soluble biological markers in osteoarthritis
title_fullStr Soluble biological markers in osteoarthritis
title_full_unstemmed Soluble biological markers in osteoarthritis
title_short Soluble biological markers in osteoarthritis
title_sort soluble biological markers in osteoarthritis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X211040300
work_keys_str_mv AT rousseaujeancharles solublebiologicalmarkersinosteoarthritis
AT chapurlatroland solublebiologicalmarkersinosteoarthritis
AT garneropatrick solublebiologicalmarkersinosteoarthritis