Cargando…

Sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity

OBJECTIVE: Insulin sensitivity is lower in African American (AA) versus Caucasian American (CA). We tested the hypothesis that lower insulin sensitivity in AA could be explained by mitochondrial respiratory rates, coupling efficiency, myofiber composition, or H(2)O(2) emission. A secondary aim was t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fisher, Gordon, Tay, Jeannie, Warren, Jonathan L., Garvey, W. Timothy, Yarar‐Fisher, Ceren, Gower, Barbara A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34605220
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15049
_version_ 1784578195291373568
author Fisher, Gordon
Tay, Jeannie
Warren, Jonathan L.
Garvey, W. Timothy
Yarar‐Fisher, Ceren
Gower, Barbara A.
author_facet Fisher, Gordon
Tay, Jeannie
Warren, Jonathan L.
Garvey, W. Timothy
Yarar‐Fisher, Ceren
Gower, Barbara A.
author_sort Fisher, Gordon
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Insulin sensitivity is lower in African American (AA) versus Caucasian American (CA). We tested the hypothesis that lower insulin sensitivity in AA could be explained by mitochondrial respiratory rates, coupling efficiency, myofiber composition, or H(2)O(2) emission. A secondary aim was to determine whether sex affected the results. METHODS: AA and CA men and women, 19–45 years, BMI 17–43 kg m(2), were assessed for insulin sensitivity (SI(Clamp)) using a euglycemic clamp at 120 mU/m(2)/min, muscle mitochondrial function using high‐resolution respirometry, H(2)O(2) emission using amplex red, and % myofiber composition. RESULTS: SI(Clamp) was greater in CA (p < 0.01) and women (p < 0.01). Proportion of type I myofibers was lower in AA (p < 0.01). Mitochondrial respiratory rates, coupling efficiency, and H(2)O(2) production did not differ with race. Mitochondrial function was positively associated with insulin sensitivity in women but not men. Statistical adjustment for mitochondrial function, H(2)O(2) production, or fiber composition did not eliminate the race difference in SI(Clamp). CONCLUSION: Neither mitochondrial respiratory rates, coupling efficiency, myofiber composition, nor mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production explained lower SI(Clamp) in AA compared to CA. The source of lower insulin sensitivity in AA may be due to other aspects of skeletal muscle that have yet to be identified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8488557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84885572021-10-08 Sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity Fisher, Gordon Tay, Jeannie Warren, Jonathan L. Garvey, W. Timothy Yarar‐Fisher, Ceren Gower, Barbara A. Physiol Rep Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Insulin sensitivity is lower in African American (AA) versus Caucasian American (CA). We tested the hypothesis that lower insulin sensitivity in AA could be explained by mitochondrial respiratory rates, coupling efficiency, myofiber composition, or H(2)O(2) emission. A secondary aim was to determine whether sex affected the results. METHODS: AA and CA men and women, 19–45 years, BMI 17–43 kg m(2), were assessed for insulin sensitivity (SI(Clamp)) using a euglycemic clamp at 120 mU/m(2)/min, muscle mitochondrial function using high‐resolution respirometry, H(2)O(2) emission using amplex red, and % myofiber composition. RESULTS: SI(Clamp) was greater in CA (p < 0.01) and women (p < 0.01). Proportion of type I myofibers was lower in AA (p < 0.01). Mitochondrial respiratory rates, coupling efficiency, and H(2)O(2) production did not differ with race. Mitochondrial function was positively associated with insulin sensitivity in women but not men. Statistical adjustment for mitochondrial function, H(2)O(2) production, or fiber composition did not eliminate the race difference in SI(Clamp). CONCLUSION: Neither mitochondrial respiratory rates, coupling efficiency, myofiber composition, nor mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production explained lower SI(Clamp) in AA compared to CA. The source of lower insulin sensitivity in AA may be due to other aspects of skeletal muscle that have yet to be identified. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8488557/ /pubmed/34605220 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15049 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Fisher, Gordon
Tay, Jeannie
Warren, Jonathan L.
Garvey, W. Timothy
Yarar‐Fisher, Ceren
Gower, Barbara A.
Sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity
title Sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity
title_full Sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity
title_fullStr Sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity
title_full_unstemmed Sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity
title_short Sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity
title_sort sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34605220
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15049
work_keys_str_mv AT fishergordon sexandracecontributetovariationinmitochondrialfunctionandinsulinsensitivity
AT tayjeannie sexandracecontributetovariationinmitochondrialfunctionandinsulinsensitivity
AT warrenjonathanl sexandracecontributetovariationinmitochondrialfunctionandinsulinsensitivity
AT garveywtimothy sexandracecontributetovariationinmitochondrialfunctionandinsulinsensitivity
AT yararfisherceren sexandracecontributetovariationinmitochondrialfunctionandinsulinsensitivity
AT gowerbarbaraa sexandracecontributetovariationinmitochondrialfunctionandinsulinsensitivity