Cargando…
Sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity
OBJECTIVE: Insulin sensitivity is lower in African American (AA) versus Caucasian American (CA). We tested the hypothesis that lower insulin sensitivity in AA could be explained by mitochondrial respiratory rates, coupling efficiency, myofiber composition, or H(2)O(2) emission. A secondary aim was t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34605220 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15049 |
_version_ | 1784578195291373568 |
---|---|
author | Fisher, Gordon Tay, Jeannie Warren, Jonathan L. Garvey, W. Timothy Yarar‐Fisher, Ceren Gower, Barbara A. |
author_facet | Fisher, Gordon Tay, Jeannie Warren, Jonathan L. Garvey, W. Timothy Yarar‐Fisher, Ceren Gower, Barbara A. |
author_sort | Fisher, Gordon |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Insulin sensitivity is lower in African American (AA) versus Caucasian American (CA). We tested the hypothesis that lower insulin sensitivity in AA could be explained by mitochondrial respiratory rates, coupling efficiency, myofiber composition, or H(2)O(2) emission. A secondary aim was to determine whether sex affected the results. METHODS: AA and CA men and women, 19–45 years, BMI 17–43 kg m(2), were assessed for insulin sensitivity (SI(Clamp)) using a euglycemic clamp at 120 mU/m(2)/min, muscle mitochondrial function using high‐resolution respirometry, H(2)O(2) emission using amplex red, and % myofiber composition. RESULTS: SI(Clamp) was greater in CA (p < 0.01) and women (p < 0.01). Proportion of type I myofibers was lower in AA (p < 0.01). Mitochondrial respiratory rates, coupling efficiency, and H(2)O(2) production did not differ with race. Mitochondrial function was positively associated with insulin sensitivity in women but not men. Statistical adjustment for mitochondrial function, H(2)O(2) production, or fiber composition did not eliminate the race difference in SI(Clamp). CONCLUSION: Neither mitochondrial respiratory rates, coupling efficiency, myofiber composition, nor mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production explained lower SI(Clamp) in AA compared to CA. The source of lower insulin sensitivity in AA may be due to other aspects of skeletal muscle that have yet to be identified. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8488557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84885572021-10-08 Sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity Fisher, Gordon Tay, Jeannie Warren, Jonathan L. Garvey, W. Timothy Yarar‐Fisher, Ceren Gower, Barbara A. Physiol Rep Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Insulin sensitivity is lower in African American (AA) versus Caucasian American (CA). We tested the hypothesis that lower insulin sensitivity in AA could be explained by mitochondrial respiratory rates, coupling efficiency, myofiber composition, or H(2)O(2) emission. A secondary aim was to determine whether sex affected the results. METHODS: AA and CA men and women, 19–45 years, BMI 17–43 kg m(2), were assessed for insulin sensitivity (SI(Clamp)) using a euglycemic clamp at 120 mU/m(2)/min, muscle mitochondrial function using high‐resolution respirometry, H(2)O(2) emission using amplex red, and % myofiber composition. RESULTS: SI(Clamp) was greater in CA (p < 0.01) and women (p < 0.01). Proportion of type I myofibers was lower in AA (p < 0.01). Mitochondrial respiratory rates, coupling efficiency, and H(2)O(2) production did not differ with race. Mitochondrial function was positively associated with insulin sensitivity in women but not men. Statistical adjustment for mitochondrial function, H(2)O(2) production, or fiber composition did not eliminate the race difference in SI(Clamp). CONCLUSION: Neither mitochondrial respiratory rates, coupling efficiency, myofiber composition, nor mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production explained lower SI(Clamp) in AA compared to CA. The source of lower insulin sensitivity in AA may be due to other aspects of skeletal muscle that have yet to be identified. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8488557/ /pubmed/34605220 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15049 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Fisher, Gordon Tay, Jeannie Warren, Jonathan L. Garvey, W. Timothy Yarar‐Fisher, Ceren Gower, Barbara A. Sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity |
title | Sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity |
title_full | Sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity |
title_fullStr | Sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity |
title_short | Sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity |
title_sort | sex and race contribute to variation in mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34605220 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fishergordon sexandracecontributetovariationinmitochondrialfunctionandinsulinsensitivity AT tayjeannie sexandracecontributetovariationinmitochondrialfunctionandinsulinsensitivity AT warrenjonathanl sexandracecontributetovariationinmitochondrialfunctionandinsulinsensitivity AT garveywtimothy sexandracecontributetovariationinmitochondrialfunctionandinsulinsensitivity AT yararfisherceren sexandracecontributetovariationinmitochondrialfunctionandinsulinsensitivity AT gowerbarbaraa sexandracecontributetovariationinmitochondrialfunctionandinsulinsensitivity |