Cargando…

Accuracy of State-Level Surveillance during Emerging Outbreaks of Respiratory Viruses: A Model-Based Assessment

It is long perceived that the more data collection, the more knowledge emerges about the real disease progression. During emergencies like the H1N1 and the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemics, public health surveillance requested increased testing to address the exacerbated dem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Yuwen, DeDoncker, Elise, VanEnk, Richard, Paul, Rajib, Peters, Susan, Stoltman, Gillian, Prieto, Diana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34269123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X211022276
_version_ 1784578210323759104
author Gu, Yuwen
DeDoncker, Elise
VanEnk, Richard
Paul, Rajib
Peters, Susan
Stoltman, Gillian
Prieto, Diana
author_facet Gu, Yuwen
DeDoncker, Elise
VanEnk, Richard
Paul, Rajib
Peters, Susan
Stoltman, Gillian
Prieto, Diana
author_sort Gu, Yuwen
collection PubMed
description It is long perceived that the more data collection, the more knowledge emerges about the real disease progression. During emergencies like the H1N1 and the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemics, public health surveillance requested increased testing to address the exacerbated demand. However, it is currently unknown how accurately surveillance portrays disease progression through incidence and confirmed case trends. State surveillance, unlike commercial testing, can process specimens based on the upcoming demand (e.g., with testing restrictions). Hence, proper assessment of accuracy may lead to improvements for a robust infrastructure. Using the H1N1 pandemic experience, we developed a simulation that models the true unobserved influenza incidence trend in the State of Michigan, as well as trends observed at different data collection points of the surveillance system. We calculated the growth rate, or speed at which each trend increases during the pandemic growth phase, and we performed statistical experiments to assess the biases (or differences) between growth rates of unobserved and observed trends. We highlight the following results: 1) emergency-driven high-risk perception increases reporting, which leads to reduction of biases in the growth rates; 2) the best predicted growth rates are those estimated from the trend of specimens submitted to the surveillance point that receives reports from a variety of health care providers; and 3) under several criteria to queue specimens for viral subtyping with limited capacity, the best-performing criterion was to queue first-come, first-serve restricted to specimens with higher hospitalization risk. Under this criterion, the lab released capacity to subtype specimens for each day in the trend, which reduced the growth rate bias the most compared to other queuing criteria. Future research should investigate additional restrictions to the queue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8488654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84886542021-10-05 Accuracy of State-Level Surveillance during Emerging Outbreaks of Respiratory Viruses: A Model-Based Assessment Gu, Yuwen DeDoncker, Elise VanEnk, Richard Paul, Rajib Peters, Susan Stoltman, Gillian Prieto, Diana Med Decis Making Original Research Articles It is long perceived that the more data collection, the more knowledge emerges about the real disease progression. During emergencies like the H1N1 and the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemics, public health surveillance requested increased testing to address the exacerbated demand. However, it is currently unknown how accurately surveillance portrays disease progression through incidence and confirmed case trends. State surveillance, unlike commercial testing, can process specimens based on the upcoming demand (e.g., with testing restrictions). Hence, proper assessment of accuracy may lead to improvements for a robust infrastructure. Using the H1N1 pandemic experience, we developed a simulation that models the true unobserved influenza incidence trend in the State of Michigan, as well as trends observed at different data collection points of the surveillance system. We calculated the growth rate, or speed at which each trend increases during the pandemic growth phase, and we performed statistical experiments to assess the biases (or differences) between growth rates of unobserved and observed trends. We highlight the following results: 1) emergency-driven high-risk perception increases reporting, which leads to reduction of biases in the growth rates; 2) the best predicted growth rates are those estimated from the trend of specimens submitted to the surveillance point that receives reports from a variety of health care providers; and 3) under several criteria to queue specimens for viral subtyping with limited capacity, the best-performing criterion was to queue first-come, first-serve restricted to specimens with higher hospitalization risk. Under this criterion, the lab released capacity to subtype specimens for each day in the trend, which reduced the growth rate bias the most compared to other queuing criteria. Future research should investigate additional restrictions to the queue. SAGE Publications 2021-07-16 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8488654/ /pubmed/34269123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X211022276 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Gu, Yuwen
DeDoncker, Elise
VanEnk, Richard
Paul, Rajib
Peters, Susan
Stoltman, Gillian
Prieto, Diana
Accuracy of State-Level Surveillance during Emerging Outbreaks of Respiratory Viruses: A Model-Based Assessment
title Accuracy of State-Level Surveillance during Emerging Outbreaks of Respiratory Viruses: A Model-Based Assessment
title_full Accuracy of State-Level Surveillance during Emerging Outbreaks of Respiratory Viruses: A Model-Based Assessment
title_fullStr Accuracy of State-Level Surveillance during Emerging Outbreaks of Respiratory Viruses: A Model-Based Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of State-Level Surveillance during Emerging Outbreaks of Respiratory Viruses: A Model-Based Assessment
title_short Accuracy of State-Level Surveillance during Emerging Outbreaks of Respiratory Viruses: A Model-Based Assessment
title_sort accuracy of state-level surveillance during emerging outbreaks of respiratory viruses: a model-based assessment
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8488654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34269123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X211022276
work_keys_str_mv AT guyuwen accuracyofstatelevelsurveillanceduringemergingoutbreaksofrespiratoryvirusesamodelbasedassessment
AT dedonckerelise accuracyofstatelevelsurveillanceduringemergingoutbreaksofrespiratoryvirusesamodelbasedassessment
AT vanenkrichard accuracyofstatelevelsurveillanceduringemergingoutbreaksofrespiratoryvirusesamodelbasedassessment
AT paulrajib accuracyofstatelevelsurveillanceduringemergingoutbreaksofrespiratoryvirusesamodelbasedassessment
AT peterssusan accuracyofstatelevelsurveillanceduringemergingoutbreaksofrespiratoryvirusesamodelbasedassessment
AT stoltmangillian accuracyofstatelevelsurveillanceduringemergingoutbreaksofrespiratoryvirusesamodelbasedassessment
AT prietodiana accuracyofstatelevelsurveillanceduringemergingoutbreaksofrespiratoryvirusesamodelbasedassessment