Cargando…

Influence of lighting environment on social preferences in sticklebacks from two different photic habitats. II. Shoaling and mate preferences of lab-bred fishes

Different environmental conditions may lead to diverse morphological, behavioral, and physiological adaptations of different populations of the same species. Lighting conditions, for example, vary vastly especially between aquatic habitats, and have been shown to elicit adaptations. The availability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hiermes, Meike, Marder, Michael B, Reher, Stephanie, Rick, Ingolf P, Vitt, Simon, Bakker, Theo C M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoab033
_version_ 1784578266210762752
author Hiermes, Meike
Marder, Michael B
Reher, Stephanie
Rick, Ingolf P
Vitt, Simon
Bakker, Theo C M
author_facet Hiermes, Meike
Marder, Michael B
Reher, Stephanie
Rick, Ingolf P
Vitt, Simon
Bakker, Theo C M
author_sort Hiermes, Meike
collection PubMed
description Different environmental conditions may lead to diverse morphological, behavioral, and physiological adaptations of different populations of the same species. Lighting conditions, for example, vary vastly especially between aquatic habitats, and have been shown to elicit adaptations. The availability of short-wave ultraviolet (UV) light is especially fluctuating, as UV wavelengths are attenuated strongly depending on water properties. The island of North Uist, Scotland, comprises 2 differential habitat types, tea-stained and clear-water lakes, varying considerably in UV transmission. In previous studies, wild-caught 3-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus populations (3 populations of each habitat type) were tested with respect to their shoaling and mate preferences for fish viewed under UV-present and UV-absent conditions. The results revealed a habitat-dependent preference of UV cues during shoal choice (tea-stained populations: preference for UV-absent condition in tea-stained water; clear-water populations: no preference in clear-water) but an overall preference for UV-present conditions during mate choice. To assess genetic influences on these behavioral patterns, similar experiments were conducted with lab-bred F1-generations of the same stickleback populations that were raised in a common environment (i.e. standardized clear-water conditions). Offspring of sticklebacks from tea-stained lakes tended to prefer shoals viewed under UV-absent conditions (only in tea-stained water), while sticklebacks from clear-water lakes showed a significant preference for the shoal viewed under UV-present conditions in clear-water but not in tea-stained water. Mate-preference experiments demonstrated that females from the tea-stained lakes significantly preferred and females from the clear-water lakes preferred by trend the male viewed under UV-present conditions in the clear-water treatment. The results for both shoaling- and mate-preference tests were largely similar for wild-caught and lab-bred sticklebacks, thus hinting at a genetic basis for the preference patterns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8489012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84890122021-10-05 Influence of lighting environment on social preferences in sticklebacks from two different photic habitats. II. Shoaling and mate preferences of lab-bred fishes Hiermes, Meike Marder, Michael B Reher, Stephanie Rick, Ingolf P Vitt, Simon Bakker, Theo C M Curr Zool Special Column: Sexual Selection and Environmental Change Different environmental conditions may lead to diverse morphological, behavioral, and physiological adaptations of different populations of the same species. Lighting conditions, for example, vary vastly especially between aquatic habitats, and have been shown to elicit adaptations. The availability of short-wave ultraviolet (UV) light is especially fluctuating, as UV wavelengths are attenuated strongly depending on water properties. The island of North Uist, Scotland, comprises 2 differential habitat types, tea-stained and clear-water lakes, varying considerably in UV transmission. In previous studies, wild-caught 3-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus populations (3 populations of each habitat type) were tested with respect to their shoaling and mate preferences for fish viewed under UV-present and UV-absent conditions. The results revealed a habitat-dependent preference of UV cues during shoal choice (tea-stained populations: preference for UV-absent condition in tea-stained water; clear-water populations: no preference in clear-water) but an overall preference for UV-present conditions during mate choice. To assess genetic influences on these behavioral patterns, similar experiments were conducted with lab-bred F1-generations of the same stickleback populations that were raised in a common environment (i.e. standardized clear-water conditions). Offspring of sticklebacks from tea-stained lakes tended to prefer shoals viewed under UV-absent conditions (only in tea-stained water), while sticklebacks from clear-water lakes showed a significant preference for the shoal viewed under UV-present conditions in clear-water but not in tea-stained water. Mate-preference experiments demonstrated that females from the tea-stained lakes significantly preferred and females from the clear-water lakes preferred by trend the male viewed under UV-present conditions in the clear-water treatment. The results for both shoaling- and mate-preference tests were largely similar for wild-caught and lab-bred sticklebacks, thus hinting at a genetic basis for the preference patterns. Oxford University Press 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8489012/ /pubmed/34616923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoab033 Text en © The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Editorial Office, Current Zoology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Special Column: Sexual Selection and Environmental Change
Hiermes, Meike
Marder, Michael B
Reher, Stephanie
Rick, Ingolf P
Vitt, Simon
Bakker, Theo C M
Influence of lighting environment on social preferences in sticklebacks from two different photic habitats. II. Shoaling and mate preferences of lab-bred fishes
title Influence of lighting environment on social preferences in sticklebacks from two different photic habitats. II. Shoaling and mate preferences of lab-bred fishes
title_full Influence of lighting environment on social preferences in sticklebacks from two different photic habitats. II. Shoaling and mate preferences of lab-bred fishes
title_fullStr Influence of lighting environment on social preferences in sticklebacks from two different photic habitats. II. Shoaling and mate preferences of lab-bred fishes
title_full_unstemmed Influence of lighting environment on social preferences in sticklebacks from two different photic habitats. II. Shoaling and mate preferences of lab-bred fishes
title_short Influence of lighting environment on social preferences in sticklebacks from two different photic habitats. II. Shoaling and mate preferences of lab-bred fishes
title_sort influence of lighting environment on social preferences in sticklebacks from two different photic habitats. ii. shoaling and mate preferences of lab-bred fishes
topic Special Column: Sexual Selection and Environmental Change
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoab033
work_keys_str_mv AT hiermesmeike influenceoflightingenvironmentonsocialpreferencesinsticklebacksfromtwodifferentphotichabitatsiishoalingandmatepreferencesoflabbredfishes
AT mardermichaelb influenceoflightingenvironmentonsocialpreferencesinsticklebacksfromtwodifferentphotichabitatsiishoalingandmatepreferencesoflabbredfishes
AT reherstephanie influenceoflightingenvironmentonsocialpreferencesinsticklebacksfromtwodifferentphotichabitatsiishoalingandmatepreferencesoflabbredfishes
AT rickingolfp influenceoflightingenvironmentonsocialpreferencesinsticklebacksfromtwodifferentphotichabitatsiishoalingandmatepreferencesoflabbredfishes
AT vittsimon influenceoflightingenvironmentonsocialpreferencesinsticklebacksfromtwodifferentphotichabitatsiishoalingandmatepreferencesoflabbredfishes
AT bakkertheocm influenceoflightingenvironmentonsocialpreferencesinsticklebacksfromtwodifferentphotichabitatsiishoalingandmatepreferencesoflabbredfishes