Cargando…

Influence of “protective” symbionts throughout the different steps of an aphid–parasitoid interaction

Microbial associates are widespread in insects, some conferring a protection to their hosts against natural enemies like parasitoids. These protective symbionts may affect the infection success of the parasitoid by modifying behavioral defenses of their hosts, the development success of the parasito...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sochard, Corentin, Bellec, Laura, Simon, Jean-Christophe, Outreman, Yannick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoaa053
_version_ 1784578269109026816
author Sochard, Corentin
Bellec, Laura
Simon, Jean-Christophe
Outreman, Yannick
author_facet Sochard, Corentin
Bellec, Laura
Simon, Jean-Christophe
Outreman, Yannick
author_sort Sochard, Corentin
collection PubMed
description Microbial associates are widespread in insects, some conferring a protection to their hosts against natural enemies like parasitoids. These protective symbionts may affect the infection success of the parasitoid by modifying behavioral defenses of their hosts, the development success of the parasitoid by conferring a resistance against it or by altering life-history traits of the emerging parasitoids. Here, we assessed the effects of different protective bacterial symbionts on the entire sequence of the host-parasitoid interaction (i.e., from parasitoid attack to offspring emergence) between the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, and its main parasitoid, Aphidius ervi and their impacts on the life-history traits of the emerging parasitoids. To test whether symbiont-mediated phenotypes were general or specific to particular aphid–symbiont associations, we considered several aphid lineages, each harboring a different strain of either Hamiltonella defensa or Regiella insecticola, two protective symbionts commonly found in aphids. We found that symbiont species and strains had a weak effect on the ability of aphids to defend themselves against the parasitic wasps during the attack and a strong effect on aphid resistance against parasitoid development. While parasitism resistance was mainly determined by symbionts, their effects on host defensive behaviors varied largely from one aphid–symbiont association to another. Also, the symbiotic status of the aphid individuals had no impact on the attack rate of the parasitic wasps, the parasitoid emergence rate from parasitized aphids nor the life-history traits of the emerging parasitoids. Overall, no correlations between symbiont effects on the different stages of the host–parasitoid interaction was observed, suggesting no trade-offs or positive associations between symbiont-mediated phenotypes. Our study highlights the need to consider various sequences of the host-parasitoid interaction to better assess the outcomes of protective symbioses and understand the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of insect–symbiont associations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8489026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84890262021-10-05 Influence of “protective” symbionts throughout the different steps of an aphid–parasitoid interaction Sochard, Corentin Bellec, Laura Simon, Jean-Christophe Outreman, Yannick Curr Zool Articles Microbial associates are widespread in insects, some conferring a protection to their hosts against natural enemies like parasitoids. These protective symbionts may affect the infection success of the parasitoid by modifying behavioral defenses of their hosts, the development success of the parasitoid by conferring a resistance against it or by altering life-history traits of the emerging parasitoids. Here, we assessed the effects of different protective bacterial symbionts on the entire sequence of the host-parasitoid interaction (i.e., from parasitoid attack to offspring emergence) between the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, and its main parasitoid, Aphidius ervi and their impacts on the life-history traits of the emerging parasitoids. To test whether symbiont-mediated phenotypes were general or specific to particular aphid–symbiont associations, we considered several aphid lineages, each harboring a different strain of either Hamiltonella defensa or Regiella insecticola, two protective symbionts commonly found in aphids. We found that symbiont species and strains had a weak effect on the ability of aphids to defend themselves against the parasitic wasps during the attack and a strong effect on aphid resistance against parasitoid development. While parasitism resistance was mainly determined by symbionts, their effects on host defensive behaviors varied largely from one aphid–symbiont association to another. Also, the symbiotic status of the aphid individuals had no impact on the attack rate of the parasitic wasps, the parasitoid emergence rate from parasitized aphids nor the life-history traits of the emerging parasitoids. Overall, no correlations between symbiont effects on the different stages of the host–parasitoid interaction was observed, suggesting no trade-offs or positive associations between symbiont-mediated phenotypes. Our study highlights the need to consider various sequences of the host-parasitoid interaction to better assess the outcomes of protective symbioses and understand the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of insect–symbiont associations. Oxford University Press 2020-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8489026/ /pubmed/34616941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoaa053 Text en © The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Editorial Office, Current Zoology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Articles
Sochard, Corentin
Bellec, Laura
Simon, Jean-Christophe
Outreman, Yannick
Influence of “protective” symbionts throughout the different steps of an aphid–parasitoid interaction
title Influence of “protective” symbionts throughout the different steps of an aphid–parasitoid interaction
title_full Influence of “protective” symbionts throughout the different steps of an aphid–parasitoid interaction
title_fullStr Influence of “protective” symbionts throughout the different steps of an aphid–parasitoid interaction
title_full_unstemmed Influence of “protective” symbionts throughout the different steps of an aphid–parasitoid interaction
title_short Influence of “protective” symbionts throughout the different steps of an aphid–parasitoid interaction
title_sort influence of “protective” symbionts throughout the different steps of an aphid–parasitoid interaction
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoaa053
work_keys_str_mv AT sochardcorentin influenceofprotectivesymbiontsthroughoutthedifferentstepsofanaphidparasitoidinteraction
AT belleclaura influenceofprotectivesymbiontsthroughoutthedifferentstepsofanaphidparasitoidinteraction
AT simonjeanchristophe influenceofprotectivesymbiontsthroughoutthedifferentstepsofanaphidparasitoidinteraction
AT outremanyannick influenceofprotectivesymbiontsthroughoutthedifferentstepsofanaphidparasitoidinteraction