Cargando…

Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging

PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility of a manual muscle MRI segmentation method that follows a specific set of recommendations developed in our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine healthy volunteers underwent a muscle MRI examination that included a TSE T2 sequence of the thighs. Muscle segmentati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muzic, Shaun Ivan, Paoletti, Matteo, Solazzo, Francesca, Belatti, Eugenio, Vitale, Raimondo, Bergsland, Niels, Bastianello, Stefano, Pichiecchio, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pacini Editore Srl 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34632293
http://dx.doi.org/10.36185/2532-1900-052
_version_ 1784578299016511488
author Muzic, Shaun Ivan
Paoletti, Matteo
Solazzo, Francesca
Belatti, Eugenio
Vitale, Raimondo
Bergsland, Niels
Bastianello, Stefano
Pichiecchio, Anna
author_facet Muzic, Shaun Ivan
Paoletti, Matteo
Solazzo, Francesca
Belatti, Eugenio
Vitale, Raimondo
Bergsland, Niels
Bastianello, Stefano
Pichiecchio, Anna
author_sort Muzic, Shaun Ivan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility of a manual muscle MRI segmentation method that follows a specific set of recommendations developed in our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine healthy volunteers underwent a muscle MRI examination that included a TSE T2 sequence of the thighs. Muscle segmentation was performed by three operators: an expert operator (OP1) with 3 years of experience and two radiology residents (OP2 and 3) who were both given basic segmentation instructions, whereas only OP2 underwent additional supervised training from OP1. Intra- and inter-operator Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was calculated. RESULTS: OP1 showed the highest average intra-operator DSC values (0.885), whereas OP2 had higher average DSC (0.856) compared to OP3 (0.818). The highest inter-operator agreement was observed between Operators 1 and 2 (0.814) and the lowest between OP2 and OP3 (0.702). Confidence interval (CI) analysis showed that the most experienced operator also had the least variability in drawing the ROIs, whereas OP2 showed both higher intra-operator reproducibility compared to OP3 and higher inter-operator agreement with OP1. The muscles that showed the least reproducibility were the semimembranosus and the short head of the biceps femoris. DISCUSSION: Following specific recommendations such as these ones derived from our single-center experience leads to an overall high reproducibility of manual muscle segmentation and is helpful in improving both intra-operator and inter-operator reproducibility in less experienced operators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8489167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Pacini Editore Srl
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84891672021-10-08 Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging Muzic, Shaun Ivan Paoletti, Matteo Solazzo, Francesca Belatti, Eugenio Vitale, Raimondo Bergsland, Niels Bastianello, Stefano Pichiecchio, Anna Acta Myol Original Article PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility of a manual muscle MRI segmentation method that follows a specific set of recommendations developed in our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine healthy volunteers underwent a muscle MRI examination that included a TSE T2 sequence of the thighs. Muscle segmentation was performed by three operators: an expert operator (OP1) with 3 years of experience and two radiology residents (OP2 and 3) who were both given basic segmentation instructions, whereas only OP2 underwent additional supervised training from OP1. Intra- and inter-operator Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was calculated. RESULTS: OP1 showed the highest average intra-operator DSC values (0.885), whereas OP2 had higher average DSC (0.856) compared to OP3 (0.818). The highest inter-operator agreement was observed between Operators 1 and 2 (0.814) and the lowest between OP2 and OP3 (0.702). Confidence interval (CI) analysis showed that the most experienced operator also had the least variability in drawing the ROIs, whereas OP2 showed both higher intra-operator reproducibility compared to OP3 and higher inter-operator agreement with OP1. The muscles that showed the least reproducibility were the semimembranosus and the short head of the biceps femoris. DISCUSSION: Following specific recommendations such as these ones derived from our single-center experience leads to an overall high reproducibility of manual muscle segmentation and is helpful in improving both intra-operator and inter-operator reproducibility in less experienced operators. Pacini Editore Srl 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8489167/ /pubmed/34632293 http://dx.doi.org/10.36185/2532-1900-052 Text en ©2021 Gaetano Conte Academy - Mediterranean Society of Myology, Naples, Italy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the CC-BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) license. The article can be used by giving appropriate credit and mentioning the license, but only for non-commercial purposes and only in the original version. For further information: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en
spellingShingle Original Article
Muzic, Shaun Ivan
Paoletti, Matteo
Solazzo, Francesca
Belatti, Eugenio
Vitale, Raimondo
Bergsland, Niels
Bastianello, Stefano
Pichiecchio, Anna
Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging
title Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging
title_full Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging
title_fullStr Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging
title_short Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging
title_sort reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34632293
http://dx.doi.org/10.36185/2532-1900-052
work_keys_str_mv AT muzicshaunivan reproducibilityofmanualsegmentationinmuscleimaging
AT paolettimatteo reproducibilityofmanualsegmentationinmuscleimaging
AT solazzofrancesca reproducibilityofmanualsegmentationinmuscleimaging
AT belattieugenio reproducibilityofmanualsegmentationinmuscleimaging
AT vitaleraimondo reproducibilityofmanualsegmentationinmuscleimaging
AT bergslandniels reproducibilityofmanualsegmentationinmuscleimaging
AT bastianellostefano reproducibilityofmanualsegmentationinmuscleimaging
AT pichiecchioanna reproducibilityofmanualsegmentationinmuscleimaging