Cargando…
Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging
PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility of a manual muscle MRI segmentation method that follows a specific set of recommendations developed in our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine healthy volunteers underwent a muscle MRI examination that included a TSE T2 sequence of the thighs. Muscle segmentati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pacini Editore Srl
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34632293 http://dx.doi.org/10.36185/2532-1900-052 |
_version_ | 1784578299016511488 |
---|---|
author | Muzic, Shaun Ivan Paoletti, Matteo Solazzo, Francesca Belatti, Eugenio Vitale, Raimondo Bergsland, Niels Bastianello, Stefano Pichiecchio, Anna |
author_facet | Muzic, Shaun Ivan Paoletti, Matteo Solazzo, Francesca Belatti, Eugenio Vitale, Raimondo Bergsland, Niels Bastianello, Stefano Pichiecchio, Anna |
author_sort | Muzic, Shaun Ivan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility of a manual muscle MRI segmentation method that follows a specific set of recommendations developed in our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine healthy volunteers underwent a muscle MRI examination that included a TSE T2 sequence of the thighs. Muscle segmentation was performed by three operators: an expert operator (OP1) with 3 years of experience and two radiology residents (OP2 and 3) who were both given basic segmentation instructions, whereas only OP2 underwent additional supervised training from OP1. Intra- and inter-operator Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was calculated. RESULTS: OP1 showed the highest average intra-operator DSC values (0.885), whereas OP2 had higher average DSC (0.856) compared to OP3 (0.818). The highest inter-operator agreement was observed between Operators 1 and 2 (0.814) and the lowest between OP2 and OP3 (0.702). Confidence interval (CI) analysis showed that the most experienced operator also had the least variability in drawing the ROIs, whereas OP2 showed both higher intra-operator reproducibility compared to OP3 and higher inter-operator agreement with OP1. The muscles that showed the least reproducibility were the semimembranosus and the short head of the biceps femoris. DISCUSSION: Following specific recommendations such as these ones derived from our single-center experience leads to an overall high reproducibility of manual muscle segmentation and is helpful in improving both intra-operator and inter-operator reproducibility in less experienced operators. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8489167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Pacini Editore Srl |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84891672021-10-08 Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging Muzic, Shaun Ivan Paoletti, Matteo Solazzo, Francesca Belatti, Eugenio Vitale, Raimondo Bergsland, Niels Bastianello, Stefano Pichiecchio, Anna Acta Myol Original Article PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility of a manual muscle MRI segmentation method that follows a specific set of recommendations developed in our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine healthy volunteers underwent a muscle MRI examination that included a TSE T2 sequence of the thighs. Muscle segmentation was performed by three operators: an expert operator (OP1) with 3 years of experience and two radiology residents (OP2 and 3) who were both given basic segmentation instructions, whereas only OP2 underwent additional supervised training from OP1. Intra- and inter-operator Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was calculated. RESULTS: OP1 showed the highest average intra-operator DSC values (0.885), whereas OP2 had higher average DSC (0.856) compared to OP3 (0.818). The highest inter-operator agreement was observed between Operators 1 and 2 (0.814) and the lowest between OP2 and OP3 (0.702). Confidence interval (CI) analysis showed that the most experienced operator also had the least variability in drawing the ROIs, whereas OP2 showed both higher intra-operator reproducibility compared to OP3 and higher inter-operator agreement with OP1. The muscles that showed the least reproducibility were the semimembranosus and the short head of the biceps femoris. DISCUSSION: Following specific recommendations such as these ones derived from our single-center experience leads to an overall high reproducibility of manual muscle segmentation and is helpful in improving both intra-operator and inter-operator reproducibility in less experienced operators. Pacini Editore Srl 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8489167/ /pubmed/34632293 http://dx.doi.org/10.36185/2532-1900-052 Text en ©2021 Gaetano Conte Academy - Mediterranean Society of Myology, Naples, Italy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the CC-BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) license. The article can be used by giving appropriate credit and mentioning the license, but only for non-commercial purposes and only in the original version. For further information: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en |
spellingShingle | Original Article Muzic, Shaun Ivan Paoletti, Matteo Solazzo, Francesca Belatti, Eugenio Vitale, Raimondo Bergsland, Niels Bastianello, Stefano Pichiecchio, Anna Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging |
title | Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging |
title_full | Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging |
title_fullStr | Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging |
title_short | Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging |
title_sort | reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34632293 http://dx.doi.org/10.36185/2532-1900-052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muzicshaunivan reproducibilityofmanualsegmentationinmuscleimaging AT paolettimatteo reproducibilityofmanualsegmentationinmuscleimaging AT solazzofrancesca reproducibilityofmanualsegmentationinmuscleimaging AT belattieugenio reproducibilityofmanualsegmentationinmuscleimaging AT vitaleraimondo reproducibilityofmanualsegmentationinmuscleimaging AT bergslandniels reproducibilityofmanualsegmentationinmuscleimaging AT bastianellostefano reproducibilityofmanualsegmentationinmuscleimaging AT pichiecchioanna reproducibilityofmanualsegmentationinmuscleimaging |