Cargando…

Tandem running by foraging Pachycondyla striata workers in field conditions vary in response to food type, food distance, and environmental conditions

Ants show collective and individual behavioral flexibility in their response to immediate context, choosing for example between different foraging strategies. In Pachycondyla striata, workers can forage solitarily or recruit and guide nestmates to larger food sources through tandem running. Although...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silva, Janiele Pereira, Valadares, Lohan, Vieira, Maria Eduarda Lima, Teseo, Serafino, Châline, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoab050
_version_ 1784578301565599744
author Silva, Janiele Pereira
Valadares, Lohan
Vieira, Maria Eduarda Lima
Teseo, Serafino
Châline, Nicolas
author_facet Silva, Janiele Pereira
Valadares, Lohan
Vieira, Maria Eduarda Lima
Teseo, Serafino
Châline, Nicolas
author_sort Silva, Janiele Pereira
collection PubMed
description Ants show collective and individual behavioral flexibility in their response to immediate context, choosing for example between different foraging strategies. In Pachycondyla striata, workers can forage solitarily or recruit and guide nestmates to larger food sources through tandem running. Although considered more ancestral and less efficient than pheromone trail-laying, this strategy is common especially in species with small colony size. What is not known is how the decision to recruit or follow varies according to the immediate context. That is, how fine adjustments in information transfer affect immediate foraging decisions at the colony level. Here, we studied individually marked workers and evaluated their foraging decisions when food items varied in nature (protein versus carbohydrate), size, and distance from the nest at different temperatures and humidity levels. Our results show that tandem run leaders and potential followers adjust their behavior according to a combination of external factors. While 84.2% of trips were solitary, most ants (81%) performed at least 1 tandem run. However, tandem runs were more frequent for nearby resources and at higher relative humidity. Interestingly, when food items were located far away, tandem runs were more successful when heading to protein sources (75%) compared with carbohydrate sources (42%). Our results suggest that the social information transfer between leaders and followers conveys more information than previously thought, and also relies on their experience and motivation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8489177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84891772021-10-05 Tandem running by foraging Pachycondyla striata workers in field conditions vary in response to food type, food distance, and environmental conditions Silva, Janiele Pereira Valadares, Lohan Vieira, Maria Eduarda Lima Teseo, Serafino Châline, Nicolas Curr Zool Special Column: Uncovering Variation in Social Insect Communication Ants show collective and individual behavioral flexibility in their response to immediate context, choosing for example between different foraging strategies. In Pachycondyla striata, workers can forage solitarily or recruit and guide nestmates to larger food sources through tandem running. Although considered more ancestral and less efficient than pheromone trail-laying, this strategy is common especially in species with small colony size. What is not known is how the decision to recruit or follow varies according to the immediate context. That is, how fine adjustments in information transfer affect immediate foraging decisions at the colony level. Here, we studied individually marked workers and evaluated their foraging decisions when food items varied in nature (protein versus carbohydrate), size, and distance from the nest at different temperatures and humidity levels. Our results show that tandem run leaders and potential followers adjust their behavior according to a combination of external factors. While 84.2% of trips were solitary, most ants (81%) performed at least 1 tandem run. However, tandem runs were more frequent for nearby resources and at higher relative humidity. Interestingly, when food items were located far away, tandem runs were more successful when heading to protein sources (75%) compared with carbohydrate sources (42%). Our results suggest that the social information transfer between leaders and followers conveys more information than previously thought, and also relies on their experience and motivation. Oxford University Press 2021-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8489177/ /pubmed/34616952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoab050 Text en © The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Editorial Office, Current Zoology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Special Column: Uncovering Variation in Social Insect Communication
Silva, Janiele Pereira
Valadares, Lohan
Vieira, Maria Eduarda Lima
Teseo, Serafino
Châline, Nicolas
Tandem running by foraging Pachycondyla striata workers in field conditions vary in response to food type, food distance, and environmental conditions
title Tandem running by foraging Pachycondyla striata workers in field conditions vary in response to food type, food distance, and environmental conditions
title_full Tandem running by foraging Pachycondyla striata workers in field conditions vary in response to food type, food distance, and environmental conditions
title_fullStr Tandem running by foraging Pachycondyla striata workers in field conditions vary in response to food type, food distance, and environmental conditions
title_full_unstemmed Tandem running by foraging Pachycondyla striata workers in field conditions vary in response to food type, food distance, and environmental conditions
title_short Tandem running by foraging Pachycondyla striata workers in field conditions vary in response to food type, food distance, and environmental conditions
title_sort tandem running by foraging pachycondyla striata workers in field conditions vary in response to food type, food distance, and environmental conditions
topic Special Column: Uncovering Variation in Social Insect Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoab050
work_keys_str_mv AT silvajanielepereira tandemrunningbyforagingpachycondylastriataworkersinfieldconditionsvaryinresponsetofoodtypefooddistanceandenvironmentalconditions
AT valadareslohan tandemrunningbyforagingpachycondylastriataworkersinfieldconditionsvaryinresponsetofoodtypefooddistanceandenvironmentalconditions
AT vieiramariaeduardalima tandemrunningbyforagingpachycondylastriataworkersinfieldconditionsvaryinresponsetofoodtypefooddistanceandenvironmentalconditions
AT teseoserafino tandemrunningbyforagingpachycondylastriataworkersinfieldconditionsvaryinresponsetofoodtypefooddistanceandenvironmentalconditions
AT chalinenicolas tandemrunningbyforagingpachycondylastriataworkersinfieldconditionsvaryinresponsetofoodtypefooddistanceandenvironmentalconditions