Cargando…

Comparisons of 3-Dimensional Conformal and Intensity-Modulated Neutron Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers

PURPOSE: Neutron therapy is a high linear energy transfer modality that is useful for the treatment of radioresistant head and neck (H&N) cancers. It has been limited to 3-dimensioanal conformal-based fast-neutron therapy (3DCNT), but recent technical advances have enabled the clinical implement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viscariello, Natalie, Greer, Matthew D., Parvathaneni, Upendra, Liao, Jay J., Laramore, George E., Stewart, Robert D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34722811
http://dx.doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-20-00059.1
_version_ 1784578347875958784
author Viscariello, Natalie
Greer, Matthew D.
Parvathaneni, Upendra
Liao, Jay J.
Laramore, George E.
Stewart, Robert D.
author_facet Viscariello, Natalie
Greer, Matthew D.
Parvathaneni, Upendra
Liao, Jay J.
Laramore, George E.
Stewart, Robert D.
author_sort Viscariello, Natalie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Neutron therapy is a high linear energy transfer modality that is useful for the treatment of radioresistant head and neck (H&N) cancers. It has been limited to 3-dimensioanal conformal-based fast-neutron therapy (3DCNT), but recent technical advances have enabled the clinical implementation of intensity-modulated neutron therapy (IMNT). This study evaluated the comparative dosimetry of IMNT and 3DCNT plans for the treatment of H&N cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven H&N IMNT plans were retrospectively created for patients previously treated with 3DCNT at the University of Washington (Seattle). A custom RayStation model with neutron-specific scattering kernels was used for inverse planning. Organ-at-risk (OAR) objectives from the original 3DCNT plan were initially used and were then systematically reduced to investigate the feasibility of improving a therapeutic ratio, defined as the ratio of the mean tumor to OAR dose. The IMNT and 3DCNT plan quality was evaluated using the therapeutic ratio, isodose contours, and dose volume histograms. RESULTS: When compared with the 3DCNT plans, IMNT reduces the OAR dose for the equivalent tumor coverage. Moreover, IMNT is most advantageous for OARs in close spatial proximity to the target. For the 7 patients with H&N cancers examined, the therapeutic ratio for IMNT increased by an average of 56% when compared with the 3DCNT. The maximum OAR dose was reduced by an average of 20.5% and 20.7% for the spinal cord and temporal lobe, respectively. The mean dose to the larynx decreased by an average of 80%. CONCLUSION: The IMNT significantly decreases the OAR doses compared with 3DCNT and provides comparable tumor coverage. Improvements in the therapeutic ratio with IMNT are especially significant for dose-limiting OARs near tumor targets. Moreover, IMNT provides superior sparing of healthy tissues and creates significant new opportunities to improve the care of patients with H&N cancers treated with neutron therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8489487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84894872021-10-28 Comparisons of 3-Dimensional Conformal and Intensity-Modulated Neutron Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers Viscariello, Natalie Greer, Matthew D. Parvathaneni, Upendra Liao, Jay J. Laramore, George E. Stewart, Robert D. Int J Part Ther Original Articles PURPOSE: Neutron therapy is a high linear energy transfer modality that is useful for the treatment of radioresistant head and neck (H&N) cancers. It has been limited to 3-dimensioanal conformal-based fast-neutron therapy (3DCNT), but recent technical advances have enabled the clinical implementation of intensity-modulated neutron therapy (IMNT). This study evaluated the comparative dosimetry of IMNT and 3DCNT plans for the treatment of H&N cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven H&N IMNT plans were retrospectively created for patients previously treated with 3DCNT at the University of Washington (Seattle). A custom RayStation model with neutron-specific scattering kernels was used for inverse planning. Organ-at-risk (OAR) objectives from the original 3DCNT plan were initially used and were then systematically reduced to investigate the feasibility of improving a therapeutic ratio, defined as the ratio of the mean tumor to OAR dose. The IMNT and 3DCNT plan quality was evaluated using the therapeutic ratio, isodose contours, and dose volume histograms. RESULTS: When compared with the 3DCNT plans, IMNT reduces the OAR dose for the equivalent tumor coverage. Moreover, IMNT is most advantageous for OARs in close spatial proximity to the target. For the 7 patients with H&N cancers examined, the therapeutic ratio for IMNT increased by an average of 56% when compared with the 3DCNT. The maximum OAR dose was reduced by an average of 20.5% and 20.7% for the spinal cord and temporal lobe, respectively. The mean dose to the larynx decreased by an average of 80%. CONCLUSION: The IMNT significantly decreases the OAR doses compared with 3DCNT and provides comparable tumor coverage. Improvements in the therapeutic ratio with IMNT are especially significant for dose-limiting OARs near tumor targets. Moreover, IMNT provides superior sparing of healthy tissues and creates significant new opportunities to improve the care of patients with H&N cancers treated with neutron therapy. The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8489487/ /pubmed/34722811 http://dx.doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-20-00059.1 Text en ©Copyright 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Articles
Viscariello, Natalie
Greer, Matthew D.
Parvathaneni, Upendra
Liao, Jay J.
Laramore, George E.
Stewart, Robert D.
Comparisons of 3-Dimensional Conformal and Intensity-Modulated Neutron Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers
title Comparisons of 3-Dimensional Conformal and Intensity-Modulated Neutron Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers
title_full Comparisons of 3-Dimensional Conformal and Intensity-Modulated Neutron Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers
title_fullStr Comparisons of 3-Dimensional Conformal and Intensity-Modulated Neutron Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of 3-Dimensional Conformal and Intensity-Modulated Neutron Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers
title_short Comparisons of 3-Dimensional Conformal and Intensity-Modulated Neutron Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers
title_sort comparisons of 3-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated neutron therapy for head and neck cancers
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34722811
http://dx.doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-20-00059.1
work_keys_str_mv AT viscariellonatalie comparisonsof3dimensionalconformalandintensitymodulatedneutrontherapyforheadandneckcancers
AT greermatthewd comparisonsof3dimensionalconformalandintensitymodulatedneutrontherapyforheadandneckcancers
AT parvathaneniupendra comparisonsof3dimensionalconformalandintensitymodulatedneutrontherapyforheadandneckcancers
AT liaojayj comparisonsof3dimensionalconformalandintensitymodulatedneutrontherapyforheadandneckcancers
AT laramoregeorgee comparisonsof3dimensionalconformalandintensitymodulatedneutrontherapyforheadandneckcancers
AT stewartrobertd comparisonsof3dimensionalconformalandintensitymodulatedneutrontherapyforheadandneckcancers