Cargando…
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in chronic non-bacterial osteitis: Proof-of-concept of the apparent diffusion coefficient as an outcome measure
BACKGROUND: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), as determined by whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI, may be useful as an outcome measure for monitoring response to treatment in chronic non-bacterial osteitis. PURPOSE: To test and demonstrate the feasibility of ADC-measurement methods for use as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20584601211044478 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), as determined by whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI, may be useful as an outcome measure for monitoring response to treatment in chronic non-bacterial osteitis. PURPOSE: To test and demonstrate the feasibility of ADC-measurement methods for use as outcome measure in chronic non-bacterial osteitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from a randomized pilot study, feasibility of change-score ADC between baseline and second MRI (ΔADC(12)) and third MRI (ΔADC(13)) as outcome measure was assessed in three settings: “whole-lesion,” “single-slice per lesion,” and “index-lesion per patient”. Bone marrow edema lesions were depicted on short tau inversion recovery sequence at baseline and copied to ADC maps at the three time-points. Correlations between the three settings were measured as were analysis of variances. Discriminant validity was assessed as inter- and intra-observer reproducibility and smallest detectable change. RESULTS: 12 subjects were enrolled, and MRI was performed at baseline and weeks 12 and 36. Pearson correlation was high (r > 0.86; p ≤ 0.01) for ΔADC between single-slice—whole-lesion and whole-lesion—index-lesion and tended to be significant for single-slice—index-lesion settings (p = 0.06). For ΔADC(12) and ΔADC(13), Bland–Altman plots showed small differences (0.02, 0.03) and narrow 95% limits-of-agreement (−0.13–0.09, −0.07–0.05 μm(2)/s) between whole-lesion and single-slice ROI settings. Inter-observer reproducibility measured by intra-class correlation coefficient was poor-to-fair (range: 0.09–0.31), whereas intra-observer reproducibility was good-to-excellent (range: 0.67–0.90). Smallest detectable changes were between 0.21–0.28 μm(2)/s. CONCLUSION: ADC change-score as outcome measure was feasible, and the single-slice per lesion ROI setting performed almost equally to whole-lesion setting resulting in reduced assessment time. |
---|