Cargando…

Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgery for radical gastrectomy in the treatment of advanced distal gastric cancer: long-term overall and disease-free survival (final results of a single-center study)

OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical effects and long-term efficacy of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and open surgery (OS) in radical gastrectomy for advanced distal gastric cancer. METHODS: One hundred twenty-four patients who were admitted to the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Guode, Wang, Xiaohua, Li, Yajiao, Chen, Guangyu, Cao, Yongkuan, Gong, Jiaqing, Li, Yunming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34590924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211047700
_version_ 1784578392928026624
author Luo, Guode
Wang, Xiaohua
Li, Yajiao
Chen, Guangyu
Cao, Yongkuan
Gong, Jiaqing
Li, Yunming
author_facet Luo, Guode
Wang, Xiaohua
Li, Yajiao
Chen, Guangyu
Cao, Yongkuan
Gong, Jiaqing
Li, Yunming
author_sort Luo, Guode
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical effects and long-term efficacy of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and open surgery (OS) in radical gastrectomy for advanced distal gastric cancer. METHODS: One hundred twenty-four patients who were admitted to the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of the West War Zone General Hospital from May 2008 to April 2012 were randomly divided into a HALS group (n = 62) and an OS group (n = 62). After surgery, 113 patients were followed up for 5 and 8 years, and 11 patients were lost to follow-up. The 5- and 8-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates of the two groups were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: The 5- and 8-year overall survival rates were 31.90% and 18.40% in the HALS group and 32.50% and 18.60% in the OS group, respectively. The 5- and 8-year disease-free survival rates were 21.50% and 13.00% in the HALS group and 21.90% and 13.10% in the OS group, respectively. No significant differences were found. CONCLUSION: Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for advanced distal gastric cancer has the advantages of less severe trauma, less intraoperative blood loss, more rapid postoperative recovery, and equivalent long-term efficacy compared with OS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8489768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84897682021-10-05 Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgery for radical gastrectomy in the treatment of advanced distal gastric cancer: long-term overall and disease-free survival (final results of a single-center study) Luo, Guode Wang, Xiaohua Li, Yajiao Chen, Guangyu Cao, Yongkuan Gong, Jiaqing Li, Yunming J Int Med Res Retrospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical effects and long-term efficacy of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and open surgery (OS) in radical gastrectomy for advanced distal gastric cancer. METHODS: One hundred twenty-four patients who were admitted to the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of the West War Zone General Hospital from May 2008 to April 2012 were randomly divided into a HALS group (n = 62) and an OS group (n = 62). After surgery, 113 patients were followed up for 5 and 8 years, and 11 patients were lost to follow-up. The 5- and 8-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates of the two groups were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: The 5- and 8-year overall survival rates were 31.90% and 18.40% in the HALS group and 32.50% and 18.60% in the OS group, respectively. The 5- and 8-year disease-free survival rates were 21.50% and 13.00% in the HALS group and 21.90% and 13.10% in the OS group, respectively. No significant differences were found. CONCLUSION: Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for advanced distal gastric cancer has the advantages of less severe trauma, less intraoperative blood loss, more rapid postoperative recovery, and equivalent long-term efficacy compared with OS. SAGE Publications 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8489768/ /pubmed/34590924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211047700 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Retrospective Clinical Research Report
Luo, Guode
Wang, Xiaohua
Li, Yajiao
Chen, Guangyu
Cao, Yongkuan
Gong, Jiaqing
Li, Yunming
Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgery for radical gastrectomy in the treatment of advanced distal gastric cancer: long-term overall and disease-free survival (final results of a single-center study)
title Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgery for radical gastrectomy in the treatment of advanced distal gastric cancer: long-term overall and disease-free survival (final results of a single-center study)
title_full Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgery for radical gastrectomy in the treatment of advanced distal gastric cancer: long-term overall and disease-free survival (final results of a single-center study)
title_fullStr Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgery for radical gastrectomy in the treatment of advanced distal gastric cancer: long-term overall and disease-free survival (final results of a single-center study)
title_full_unstemmed Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgery for radical gastrectomy in the treatment of advanced distal gastric cancer: long-term overall and disease-free survival (final results of a single-center study)
title_short Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgery for radical gastrectomy in the treatment of advanced distal gastric cancer: long-term overall and disease-free survival (final results of a single-center study)
title_sort hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgery for radical gastrectomy in the treatment of advanced distal gastric cancer: long-term overall and disease-free survival (final results of a single-center study)
topic Retrospective Clinical Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34590924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211047700
work_keys_str_mv AT luoguode handassistedlaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforradicalgastrectomyinthetreatmentofadvanceddistalgastriccancerlongtermoverallanddiseasefreesurvivalfinalresultsofasinglecenterstudy
AT wangxiaohua handassistedlaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforradicalgastrectomyinthetreatmentofadvanceddistalgastriccancerlongtermoverallanddiseasefreesurvivalfinalresultsofasinglecenterstudy
AT liyajiao handassistedlaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforradicalgastrectomyinthetreatmentofadvanceddistalgastriccancerlongtermoverallanddiseasefreesurvivalfinalresultsofasinglecenterstudy
AT chenguangyu handassistedlaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforradicalgastrectomyinthetreatmentofadvanceddistalgastriccancerlongtermoverallanddiseasefreesurvivalfinalresultsofasinglecenterstudy
AT caoyongkuan handassistedlaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforradicalgastrectomyinthetreatmentofadvanceddistalgastriccancerlongtermoverallanddiseasefreesurvivalfinalresultsofasinglecenterstudy
AT gongjiaqing handassistedlaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforradicalgastrectomyinthetreatmentofadvanceddistalgastriccancerlongtermoverallanddiseasefreesurvivalfinalresultsofasinglecenterstudy
AT liyunming handassistedlaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforradicalgastrectomyinthetreatmentofadvanceddistalgastriccancerlongtermoverallanddiseasefreesurvivalfinalresultsofasinglecenterstudy