Cargando…

Predicting lipoabdominoplasty complications with infrared thermography: a delta-R analysis

The diagnosis of the main complications resulting from lipoabdominoplasty has not yet been standardized. Infrared thermal imaging has been used to assess possible complications, such as necrosis and changes in micro- and macro-circulation, based on perforator mapping techniques, among others. The ob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Resende, Patricia Rodrigues, Brioschi, Marcos Leal, De Meneck, Franciele, Neves, Eduardo Borba, Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34583445
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2021.00101
_version_ 1784578453596536832
author Resende, Patricia Rodrigues
Brioschi, Marcos Leal
De Meneck, Franciele
Neves, Eduardo Borba
Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen
author_facet Resende, Patricia Rodrigues
Brioschi, Marcos Leal
De Meneck, Franciele
Neves, Eduardo Borba
Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen
author_sort Resende, Patricia Rodrigues
collection PubMed
description The diagnosis of the main complications resulting from lipoabdominoplasty has not yet been standardized. Infrared thermal imaging has been used to assess possible complications, such as necrosis and changes in micro- and macro-circulation, based on perforator mapping techniques, among others. The objective of this study was to present two clinical cases involving thermal imaging monitoring of the healing process of lipoabdominoplasty in the immediate postoperative evaluation and its preliminary results. Infrared thermography was performed 24 hours after the operation and on postoperative days 5, 25, and 27. In clinical case 1, it was found that the delta-R (∆T(R))–defined as the difference in minimum temperature between the highest and lowest points in the SA3 region (caution suction area) following the classification established by Matarasso–was 0.4°C at 24 hours after surgery and decreased to 0.1°C on a postoperative day 5. There were no complications in this case. In contrast, in clinical case 2, the ∆T(R) was 1.7°C at 24 hours after surgery (upon hospital discharge) and remained high, at 2.2°C, on postoperative day 5. A higher ∆T(R) was found in the second patient, who developed necrosis of the surgical wound. The ∆T(R) thermal index may be a new tool for predicting possible complications, complementing the clinical evaluation and therapeutic decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8490102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84901022021-10-08 Predicting lipoabdominoplasty complications with infrared thermography: a delta-R analysis Resende, Patricia Rodrigues Brioschi, Marcos Leal De Meneck, Franciele Neves, Eduardo Borba Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen Arch Plast Surg Research/Experimental The diagnosis of the main complications resulting from lipoabdominoplasty has not yet been standardized. Infrared thermal imaging has been used to assess possible complications, such as necrosis and changes in micro- and macro-circulation, based on perforator mapping techniques, among others. The objective of this study was to present two clinical cases involving thermal imaging monitoring of the healing process of lipoabdominoplasty in the immediate postoperative evaluation and its preliminary results. Infrared thermography was performed 24 hours after the operation and on postoperative days 5, 25, and 27. In clinical case 1, it was found that the delta-R (∆T(R))–defined as the difference in minimum temperature between the highest and lowest points in the SA3 region (caution suction area) following the classification established by Matarasso–was 0.4°C at 24 hours after surgery and decreased to 0.1°C on a postoperative day 5. There were no complications in this case. In contrast, in clinical case 2, the ∆T(R) was 1.7°C at 24 hours after surgery (upon hospital discharge) and remained high, at 2.2°C, on postoperative day 5. A higher ∆T(R) was found in the second patient, who developed necrosis of the surgical wound. The ∆T(R) thermal index may be a new tool for predicting possible complications, complementing the clinical evaluation and therapeutic decision-making. Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2021-09 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8490102/ /pubmed/34583445 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2021.00101 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research/Experimental
Resende, Patricia Rodrigues
Brioschi, Marcos Leal
De Meneck, Franciele
Neves, Eduardo Borba
Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen
Predicting lipoabdominoplasty complications with infrared thermography: a delta-R analysis
title Predicting lipoabdominoplasty complications with infrared thermography: a delta-R analysis
title_full Predicting lipoabdominoplasty complications with infrared thermography: a delta-R analysis
title_fullStr Predicting lipoabdominoplasty complications with infrared thermography: a delta-R analysis
title_full_unstemmed Predicting lipoabdominoplasty complications with infrared thermography: a delta-R analysis
title_short Predicting lipoabdominoplasty complications with infrared thermography: a delta-R analysis
title_sort predicting lipoabdominoplasty complications with infrared thermography: a delta-r analysis
topic Research/Experimental
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34583445
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2021.00101
work_keys_str_mv AT resendepatriciarodrigues predictinglipoabdominoplastycomplicationswithinfraredthermographyadeltaranalysis
AT brioschimarcosleal predictinglipoabdominoplastycomplicationswithinfraredthermographyadeltaranalysis
AT demeneckfranciele predictinglipoabdominoplastycomplicationswithinfraredthermographyadeltaranalysis
AT neveseduardoborba predictinglipoabdominoplastycomplicationswithinfraredthermographyadeltaranalysis
AT teixeiramanoeljacobsen predictinglipoabdominoplastycomplicationswithinfraredthermographyadeltaranalysis