Cargando…
Comparison of Conventional Methods for Bowel Length Measurement in Laparoscopic Surgery to a Novel Computer-Assisted 3D Measurement System
PURPOSE: Accurate laparoscopic bowel length measurement (LBLM), which is used primarily in metabolic surgery, remains a challenge. This study aims to three conventional methods for LBLM, namely using visual judgment (VJ), instrument markings (IM), or premeasured tape (PT) to a novel computer-assiste...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34331186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05620-6 |
_version_ | 1784578488602198016 |
---|---|
author | Wagner, Martin Mayer, Benjamin F. B. Bodenstedt, Sebastian Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich Nickel, Felix Speidel, Stefanie Fischer, Lars Kenngott, Hannes G. Müller-Stich, Beat-Peter |
author_facet | Wagner, Martin Mayer, Benjamin F. B. Bodenstedt, Sebastian Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich Nickel, Felix Speidel, Stefanie Fischer, Lars Kenngott, Hannes G. Müller-Stich, Beat-Peter |
author_sort | Wagner, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Accurate laparoscopic bowel length measurement (LBLM), which is used primarily in metabolic surgery, remains a challenge. This study aims to three conventional methods for LBLM, namely using visual judgment (VJ), instrument markings (IM), or premeasured tape (PT) to a novel computer-assisted 3D measurement system (BMS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: LBLM methods were compared using a 3D laparoscope on bowel phantoms regarding accuracy (relative error in percent, %), time in seconds (s), and number of bowel grasps. Seventy centimeters were measured seven times. As a control, the first, third, fifth, and seventh measurements were performed with VJ. The interventions IM, PT, and BMS were performed following a randomized order as the second, fourth, and sixth measurements. RESULTS: In total, 63 people participated. BMS showed better accuracy (2.1±3.7%) compared to VJ (8.7±13.7%, p=0.001), PT (4.3±6.8%, p=0.002), and IM (11±15.3%, p<0.001). Participants performed LBLM in a similar amount of time with BMS (175.7±59.7s) and PT (166.5±63.6s, p=0.35), but VJ (64.0±24.0s, p<0.001) and IM (144.9±55.4s, p=0.002) were faster. Number of bowel grasps as a measure for the risk of bowel lesions was similar for BMS (15.8±3.0) and PT (15.9±4.6, p=0.861), whereas VJ required less (14.1±3.4, p=0.004) and IM required more than BMS (22.2±6.9, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PT had higher accuracy than VJ and IM, and lower number of bowel grasps than IM. BMS shows great potential for more reliable LBLM. Until BMS is available in clinical routine, PT should be preferred for LBLM. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-021-05620-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8490232 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84902322021-10-15 Comparison of Conventional Methods for Bowel Length Measurement in Laparoscopic Surgery to a Novel Computer-Assisted 3D Measurement System Wagner, Martin Mayer, Benjamin F. B. Bodenstedt, Sebastian Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich Nickel, Felix Speidel, Stefanie Fischer, Lars Kenngott, Hannes G. Müller-Stich, Beat-Peter Obes Surg Original Contributions PURPOSE: Accurate laparoscopic bowel length measurement (LBLM), which is used primarily in metabolic surgery, remains a challenge. This study aims to three conventional methods for LBLM, namely using visual judgment (VJ), instrument markings (IM), or premeasured tape (PT) to a novel computer-assisted 3D measurement system (BMS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: LBLM methods were compared using a 3D laparoscope on bowel phantoms regarding accuracy (relative error in percent, %), time in seconds (s), and number of bowel grasps. Seventy centimeters were measured seven times. As a control, the first, third, fifth, and seventh measurements were performed with VJ. The interventions IM, PT, and BMS were performed following a randomized order as the second, fourth, and sixth measurements. RESULTS: In total, 63 people participated. BMS showed better accuracy (2.1±3.7%) compared to VJ (8.7±13.7%, p=0.001), PT (4.3±6.8%, p=0.002), and IM (11±15.3%, p<0.001). Participants performed LBLM in a similar amount of time with BMS (175.7±59.7s) and PT (166.5±63.6s, p=0.35), but VJ (64.0±24.0s, p<0.001) and IM (144.9±55.4s, p=0.002) were faster. Number of bowel grasps as a measure for the risk of bowel lesions was similar for BMS (15.8±3.0) and PT (15.9±4.6, p=0.861), whereas VJ required less (14.1±3.4, p=0.004) and IM required more than BMS (22.2±6.9, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PT had higher accuracy than VJ and IM, and lower number of bowel grasps than IM. BMS shows great potential for more reliable LBLM. Until BMS is available in clinical routine, PT should be preferred for LBLM. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-021-05620-6. Springer US 2021-07-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8490232/ /pubmed/34331186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05620-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Contributions Wagner, Martin Mayer, Benjamin F. B. Bodenstedt, Sebastian Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich Nickel, Felix Speidel, Stefanie Fischer, Lars Kenngott, Hannes G. Müller-Stich, Beat-Peter Comparison of Conventional Methods for Bowel Length Measurement in Laparoscopic Surgery to a Novel Computer-Assisted 3D Measurement System |
title | Comparison of Conventional Methods for Bowel Length Measurement in Laparoscopic Surgery to a Novel Computer-Assisted 3D Measurement System |
title_full | Comparison of Conventional Methods for Bowel Length Measurement in Laparoscopic Surgery to a Novel Computer-Assisted 3D Measurement System |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Conventional Methods for Bowel Length Measurement in Laparoscopic Surgery to a Novel Computer-Assisted 3D Measurement System |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Conventional Methods for Bowel Length Measurement in Laparoscopic Surgery to a Novel Computer-Assisted 3D Measurement System |
title_short | Comparison of Conventional Methods for Bowel Length Measurement in Laparoscopic Surgery to a Novel Computer-Assisted 3D Measurement System |
title_sort | comparison of conventional methods for bowel length measurement in laparoscopic surgery to a novel computer-assisted 3d measurement system |
topic | Original Contributions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34331186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05620-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wagnermartin comparisonofconventionalmethodsforbowellengthmeasurementinlaparoscopicsurgerytoanovelcomputerassisted3dmeasurementsystem AT mayerbenjaminfb comparisonofconventionalmethodsforbowellengthmeasurementinlaparoscopicsurgerytoanovelcomputerassisted3dmeasurementsystem AT bodenstedtsebastian comparisonofconventionalmethodsforbowellengthmeasurementinlaparoscopicsurgerytoanovelcomputerassisted3dmeasurementsystem AT kowalewskikarlfriedrich comparisonofconventionalmethodsforbowellengthmeasurementinlaparoscopicsurgerytoanovelcomputerassisted3dmeasurementsystem AT nickelfelix comparisonofconventionalmethodsforbowellengthmeasurementinlaparoscopicsurgerytoanovelcomputerassisted3dmeasurementsystem AT speidelstefanie comparisonofconventionalmethodsforbowellengthmeasurementinlaparoscopicsurgerytoanovelcomputerassisted3dmeasurementsystem AT fischerlars comparisonofconventionalmethodsforbowellengthmeasurementinlaparoscopicsurgerytoanovelcomputerassisted3dmeasurementsystem AT kenngotthannesg comparisonofconventionalmethodsforbowellengthmeasurementinlaparoscopicsurgerytoanovelcomputerassisted3dmeasurementsystem AT mullerstichbeatpeter comparisonofconventionalmethodsforbowellengthmeasurementinlaparoscopicsurgerytoanovelcomputerassisted3dmeasurementsystem |