Cargando…
The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients
Objective: This study aimed to research the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) on the lower limb function of post-convalescent stroke patients. Methods: A total of 122 patients in the stroke recovery stage who suffered from leg dysfun...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621150 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.685931 |
_version_ | 1784578566547046400 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Xiao-Hua Gu, Tao Liu, Xuan-Wei Han, Ping Lv, Hui-Lan Wang, Yu-Long Xiao, Peng |
author_facet | Zhang, Xiao-Hua Gu, Tao Liu, Xuan-Wei Han, Ping Lv, Hui-Lan Wang, Yu-Long Xiao, Peng |
author_sort | Zhang, Xiao-Hua |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: This study aimed to research the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) on the lower limb function of post-convalescent stroke patients. Methods: A total of 122 patients in the stroke recovery stage who suffered from leg dysfunction were randomly divided into two groups: a tDCS group (n = 61) and a FES group (n = 61). All patients received same routine rehabilitation and equal treatment quality, the tDCS group was treated with tDCS, while the FES group received FES. The lower limb Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), modified Barthel index (MBI), functional ambulatory category (FAC), and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) were used to assess the patients at three different stages: prior to treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment. Results: The assessment scores for FMA, MBI, and FAC for the lower extremities after treatment (P > 0.05) were compared with those before treatment. The FMA, MBI, and FAC scores of the tDCS group were significantly higher than those of the FES group in all three stages (P < 0.05). The FMA, MBI, and FAC assessment scores of both groups were significantly higher after 4 weeks of treatment than that before treatment, and the scores after 8 weeks of treatment were significantly higher than those after 4 weeks after treatment (P < 0.05). The P40, N45 latencies decreased and the P40, N45 amplitudes increased, but there was no significant difference before treatment and after treatment (P >0.05), and there was no significant difference of the tDCS and FES groups before treatment and after treatment. Conclusion: In conclusion, FMA, MBI, and FAC indicate that both tDCS and FES can significantly promote the recovery of a patient’s leg motor function and tDCS is more effective than FES in the stroke recovery stage. The application value of SEP in stroke patients remains to be further studied. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8490679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84906792021-10-06 The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients Zhang, Xiao-Hua Gu, Tao Liu, Xuan-Wei Han, Ping Lv, Hui-Lan Wang, Yu-Long Xiao, Peng Front Neurosci Neuroscience Objective: This study aimed to research the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) on the lower limb function of post-convalescent stroke patients. Methods: A total of 122 patients in the stroke recovery stage who suffered from leg dysfunction were randomly divided into two groups: a tDCS group (n = 61) and a FES group (n = 61). All patients received same routine rehabilitation and equal treatment quality, the tDCS group was treated with tDCS, while the FES group received FES. The lower limb Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), modified Barthel index (MBI), functional ambulatory category (FAC), and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) were used to assess the patients at three different stages: prior to treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment. Results: The assessment scores for FMA, MBI, and FAC for the lower extremities after treatment (P > 0.05) were compared with those before treatment. The FMA, MBI, and FAC scores of the tDCS group were significantly higher than those of the FES group in all three stages (P < 0.05). The FMA, MBI, and FAC assessment scores of both groups were significantly higher after 4 weeks of treatment than that before treatment, and the scores after 8 weeks of treatment were significantly higher than those after 4 weeks after treatment (P < 0.05). The P40, N45 latencies decreased and the P40, N45 amplitudes increased, but there was no significant difference before treatment and after treatment (P >0.05), and there was no significant difference of the tDCS and FES groups before treatment and after treatment. Conclusion: In conclusion, FMA, MBI, and FAC indicate that both tDCS and FES can significantly promote the recovery of a patient’s leg motor function and tDCS is more effective than FES in the stroke recovery stage. The application value of SEP in stroke patients remains to be further studied. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8490679/ /pubmed/34621150 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.685931 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Gu, Liu, Han, Lv, Wang and Xiao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Zhang, Xiao-Hua Gu, Tao Liu, Xuan-Wei Han, Ping Lv, Hui-Lan Wang, Yu-Long Xiao, Peng The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients |
title | The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients |
title_full | The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients |
title_short | The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients |
title_sort | effect of transcranial direct current stimulation and functional electrical stimulation on the lower limb function of stroke patients |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621150 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.685931 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangxiaohua theeffectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients AT gutao theeffectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients AT liuxuanwei theeffectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients AT hanping theeffectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients AT lvhuilan theeffectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients AT wangyulong theeffectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients AT xiaopeng theeffectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients AT zhangxiaohua effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients AT gutao effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients AT liuxuanwei effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients AT hanping effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients AT lvhuilan effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients AT wangyulong effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients AT xiaopeng effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients |