Cargando…

The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients

Objective: This study aimed to research the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) on the lower limb function of post-convalescent stroke patients. Methods: A total of 122 patients in the stroke recovery stage who suffered from leg dysfun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xiao-Hua, Gu, Tao, Liu, Xuan-Wei, Han, Ping, Lv, Hui-Lan, Wang, Yu-Long, Xiao, Peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621150
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.685931
_version_ 1784578566547046400
author Zhang, Xiao-Hua
Gu, Tao
Liu, Xuan-Wei
Han, Ping
Lv, Hui-Lan
Wang, Yu-Long
Xiao, Peng
author_facet Zhang, Xiao-Hua
Gu, Tao
Liu, Xuan-Wei
Han, Ping
Lv, Hui-Lan
Wang, Yu-Long
Xiao, Peng
author_sort Zhang, Xiao-Hua
collection PubMed
description Objective: This study aimed to research the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) on the lower limb function of post-convalescent stroke patients. Methods: A total of 122 patients in the stroke recovery stage who suffered from leg dysfunction were randomly divided into two groups: a tDCS group (n = 61) and a FES group (n = 61). All patients received same routine rehabilitation and equal treatment quality, the tDCS group was treated with tDCS, while the FES group received FES. The lower limb Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), modified Barthel index (MBI), functional ambulatory category (FAC), and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) were used to assess the patients at three different stages: prior to treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment. Results: The assessment scores for FMA, MBI, and FAC for the lower extremities after treatment (P > 0.05) were compared with those before treatment. The FMA, MBI, and FAC scores of the tDCS group were significantly higher than those of the FES group in all three stages (P < 0.05). The FMA, MBI, and FAC assessment scores of both groups were significantly higher after 4 weeks of treatment than that before treatment, and the scores after 8 weeks of treatment were significantly higher than those after 4 weeks after treatment (P < 0.05). The P40, N45 latencies decreased and the P40, N45 amplitudes increased, but there was no significant difference before treatment and after treatment (P >0.05), and there was no significant difference of the tDCS and FES groups before treatment and after treatment. Conclusion: In conclusion, FMA, MBI, and FAC indicate that both tDCS and FES can significantly promote the recovery of a patient’s leg motor function and tDCS is more effective than FES in the stroke recovery stage. The application value of SEP in stroke patients remains to be further studied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8490679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84906792021-10-06 The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients Zhang, Xiao-Hua Gu, Tao Liu, Xuan-Wei Han, Ping Lv, Hui-Lan Wang, Yu-Long Xiao, Peng Front Neurosci Neuroscience Objective: This study aimed to research the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) on the lower limb function of post-convalescent stroke patients. Methods: A total of 122 patients in the stroke recovery stage who suffered from leg dysfunction were randomly divided into two groups: a tDCS group (n = 61) and a FES group (n = 61). All patients received same routine rehabilitation and equal treatment quality, the tDCS group was treated with tDCS, while the FES group received FES. The lower limb Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), modified Barthel index (MBI), functional ambulatory category (FAC), and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) were used to assess the patients at three different stages: prior to treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment. Results: The assessment scores for FMA, MBI, and FAC for the lower extremities after treatment (P > 0.05) were compared with those before treatment. The FMA, MBI, and FAC scores of the tDCS group were significantly higher than those of the FES group in all three stages (P < 0.05). The FMA, MBI, and FAC assessment scores of both groups were significantly higher after 4 weeks of treatment than that before treatment, and the scores after 8 weeks of treatment were significantly higher than those after 4 weeks after treatment (P < 0.05). The P40, N45 latencies decreased and the P40, N45 amplitudes increased, but there was no significant difference before treatment and after treatment (P >0.05), and there was no significant difference of the tDCS and FES groups before treatment and after treatment. Conclusion: In conclusion, FMA, MBI, and FAC indicate that both tDCS and FES can significantly promote the recovery of a patient’s leg motor function and tDCS is more effective than FES in the stroke recovery stage. The application value of SEP in stroke patients remains to be further studied. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8490679/ /pubmed/34621150 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.685931 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Gu, Liu, Han, Lv, Wang and Xiao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Zhang, Xiao-Hua
Gu, Tao
Liu, Xuan-Wei
Han, Ping
Lv, Hui-Lan
Wang, Yu-Long
Xiao, Peng
The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients
title The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients
title_full The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients
title_fullStr The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients
title_short The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients
title_sort effect of transcranial direct current stimulation and functional electrical stimulation on the lower limb function of stroke patients
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621150
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.685931
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxiaohua theeffectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients
AT gutao theeffectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients
AT liuxuanwei theeffectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients
AT hanping theeffectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients
AT lvhuilan theeffectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients
AT wangyulong theeffectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients
AT xiaopeng theeffectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients
AT zhangxiaohua effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients
AT gutao effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients
AT liuxuanwei effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients
AT hanping effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients
AT lvhuilan effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients
AT wangyulong effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients
AT xiaopeng effectoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationandfunctionalelectricalstimulationonthelowerlimbfunctionofstrokepatients