Cargando…

Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting

BACKGROUND: KEYNOTE-181, ATTRACTION-3, and ESCORT trials have opened the era of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in the second-line therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). There is no head-to-head comparison of pembrolizumab vs. nivolumab vs. camrelizumab in the second-line settin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Yi-Xin, Chen, Ping, Sun, Yu-Ting, Zhang, Bei, Qiu, Miao-Zhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621668
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.698732
_version_ 1784578586930315264
author Zhou, Yi-Xin
Chen, Ping
Sun, Yu-Ting
Zhang, Bei
Qiu, Miao-Zhen
author_facet Zhou, Yi-Xin
Chen, Ping
Sun, Yu-Ting
Zhang, Bei
Qiu, Miao-Zhen
author_sort Zhou, Yi-Xin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: KEYNOTE-181, ATTRACTION-3, and ESCORT trials have opened the era of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in the second-line therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). There is no head-to-head comparison of pembrolizumab vs. nivolumab vs. camrelizumab in the second-line setting for ESCC. We performed an indirect comparison to explore the optimal choice of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for advanced ESCC. METHODS: Patients in ATTRACTION-3 and ESCORT were all squamous carcinoma, while KEYNOTE-181 enrolled both adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma patients. We only extract information of patients with squamous carcinoma from KEYNOTE 181 study and all the patients from ATTRACTION-3 and ESCORT. The main clinical outcomes for this study were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). RESULTS: Indirect analysis showed similar survival benefit among three PD-1 inhibitors. Nivolumab was comparable with pembrolizumab in most subgroups except that nivolumab was slightly better for patients with performance status (PS) score of 1 [HRnivo/pembro: 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45–1.02], p = 0.07). Compared with nivolumab indirectly, pembrolizumab and camrelizumab had better PFS [HRpembro/nivo: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.63–1.14), p = 0.29; HRcam/nivo: 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47–0.87), p = 0.004] and significantly higher ORR [RRpembro/nivo: 2.51 (95% CI: 1.22–5.15), p = 0.01; RRcam/nivo: 3.52 (95% CI: 1.73–7.18), p = 0.001]. Compared with camrelizumab indirectly, pembrolizumab had slightly worse PFS [HRpembro/cam: 1.33 (95% CI: 0.99–1.79), p = 0.057] and comparable ORR [RRpembro/cam: 0.71 (95% CI: 0.32–1.60; p = 0.41)]. Camrelizumab had a significantly higher rate of all grade TRAEs than both pembrolizumab and nivolumab. CONCLUSIONS: Combining the safety and potential survival benefit, we recommend nivolumab for ESCC patients with PS score of 1 and pembrolizumab or camrelizumab for patients with better PS and seeking for higher efficacy or longer PFS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8490758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84907582021-10-06 Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting Zhou, Yi-Xin Chen, Ping Sun, Yu-Ting Zhang, Bei Qiu, Miao-Zhen Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: KEYNOTE-181, ATTRACTION-3, and ESCORT trials have opened the era of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in the second-line therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). There is no head-to-head comparison of pembrolizumab vs. nivolumab vs. camrelizumab in the second-line setting for ESCC. We performed an indirect comparison to explore the optimal choice of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for advanced ESCC. METHODS: Patients in ATTRACTION-3 and ESCORT were all squamous carcinoma, while KEYNOTE-181 enrolled both adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma patients. We only extract information of patients with squamous carcinoma from KEYNOTE 181 study and all the patients from ATTRACTION-3 and ESCORT. The main clinical outcomes for this study were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). RESULTS: Indirect analysis showed similar survival benefit among three PD-1 inhibitors. Nivolumab was comparable with pembrolizumab in most subgroups except that nivolumab was slightly better for patients with performance status (PS) score of 1 [HRnivo/pembro: 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45–1.02], p = 0.07). Compared with nivolumab indirectly, pembrolizumab and camrelizumab had better PFS [HRpembro/nivo: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.63–1.14), p = 0.29; HRcam/nivo: 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47–0.87), p = 0.004] and significantly higher ORR [RRpembro/nivo: 2.51 (95% CI: 1.22–5.15), p = 0.01; RRcam/nivo: 3.52 (95% CI: 1.73–7.18), p = 0.001]. Compared with camrelizumab indirectly, pembrolizumab had slightly worse PFS [HRpembro/cam: 1.33 (95% CI: 0.99–1.79), p = 0.057] and comparable ORR [RRpembro/cam: 0.71 (95% CI: 0.32–1.60; p = 0.41)]. Camrelizumab had a significantly higher rate of all grade TRAEs than both pembrolizumab and nivolumab. CONCLUSIONS: Combining the safety and potential survival benefit, we recommend nivolumab for ESCC patients with PS score of 1 and pembrolizumab or camrelizumab for patients with better PS and seeking for higher efficacy or longer PFS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8490758/ /pubmed/34621668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.698732 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhou, Chen, Sun, Zhang and Qiu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhou, Yi-Xin
Chen, Ping
Sun, Yu-Ting
Zhang, Bei
Qiu, Miao-Zhen
Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting
title Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting
title_full Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting
title_fullStr Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting
title_short Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting
title_sort comparison of pd-1 inhibitors in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the second-line setting
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621668
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.698732
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouyixin comparisonofpd1inhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomainthesecondlinesetting
AT chenping comparisonofpd1inhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomainthesecondlinesetting
AT sunyuting comparisonofpd1inhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomainthesecondlinesetting
AT zhangbei comparisonofpd1inhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomainthesecondlinesetting
AT qiumiaozhen comparisonofpd1inhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomainthesecondlinesetting