Cargando…
Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting
BACKGROUND: KEYNOTE-181, ATTRACTION-3, and ESCORT trials have opened the era of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in the second-line therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). There is no head-to-head comparison of pembrolizumab vs. nivolumab vs. camrelizumab in the second-line settin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.698732 |
_version_ | 1784578586930315264 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Yi-Xin Chen, Ping Sun, Yu-Ting Zhang, Bei Qiu, Miao-Zhen |
author_facet | Zhou, Yi-Xin Chen, Ping Sun, Yu-Ting Zhang, Bei Qiu, Miao-Zhen |
author_sort | Zhou, Yi-Xin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: KEYNOTE-181, ATTRACTION-3, and ESCORT trials have opened the era of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in the second-line therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). There is no head-to-head comparison of pembrolizumab vs. nivolumab vs. camrelizumab in the second-line setting for ESCC. We performed an indirect comparison to explore the optimal choice of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for advanced ESCC. METHODS: Patients in ATTRACTION-3 and ESCORT were all squamous carcinoma, while KEYNOTE-181 enrolled both adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma patients. We only extract information of patients with squamous carcinoma from KEYNOTE 181 study and all the patients from ATTRACTION-3 and ESCORT. The main clinical outcomes for this study were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). RESULTS: Indirect analysis showed similar survival benefit among three PD-1 inhibitors. Nivolumab was comparable with pembrolizumab in most subgroups except that nivolumab was slightly better for patients with performance status (PS) score of 1 [HRnivo/pembro: 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45–1.02], p = 0.07). Compared with nivolumab indirectly, pembrolizumab and camrelizumab had better PFS [HRpembro/nivo: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.63–1.14), p = 0.29; HRcam/nivo: 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47–0.87), p = 0.004] and significantly higher ORR [RRpembro/nivo: 2.51 (95% CI: 1.22–5.15), p = 0.01; RRcam/nivo: 3.52 (95% CI: 1.73–7.18), p = 0.001]. Compared with camrelizumab indirectly, pembrolizumab had slightly worse PFS [HRpembro/cam: 1.33 (95% CI: 0.99–1.79), p = 0.057] and comparable ORR [RRpembro/cam: 0.71 (95% CI: 0.32–1.60; p = 0.41)]. Camrelizumab had a significantly higher rate of all grade TRAEs than both pembrolizumab and nivolumab. CONCLUSIONS: Combining the safety and potential survival benefit, we recommend nivolumab for ESCC patients with PS score of 1 and pembrolizumab or camrelizumab for patients with better PS and seeking for higher efficacy or longer PFS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8490758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84907582021-10-06 Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting Zhou, Yi-Xin Chen, Ping Sun, Yu-Ting Zhang, Bei Qiu, Miao-Zhen Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: KEYNOTE-181, ATTRACTION-3, and ESCORT trials have opened the era of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in the second-line therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). There is no head-to-head comparison of pembrolizumab vs. nivolumab vs. camrelizumab in the second-line setting for ESCC. We performed an indirect comparison to explore the optimal choice of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for advanced ESCC. METHODS: Patients in ATTRACTION-3 and ESCORT were all squamous carcinoma, while KEYNOTE-181 enrolled both adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma patients. We only extract information of patients with squamous carcinoma from KEYNOTE 181 study and all the patients from ATTRACTION-3 and ESCORT. The main clinical outcomes for this study were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). RESULTS: Indirect analysis showed similar survival benefit among three PD-1 inhibitors. Nivolumab was comparable with pembrolizumab in most subgroups except that nivolumab was slightly better for patients with performance status (PS) score of 1 [HRnivo/pembro: 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45–1.02], p = 0.07). Compared with nivolumab indirectly, pembrolizumab and camrelizumab had better PFS [HRpembro/nivo: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.63–1.14), p = 0.29; HRcam/nivo: 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47–0.87), p = 0.004] and significantly higher ORR [RRpembro/nivo: 2.51 (95% CI: 1.22–5.15), p = 0.01; RRcam/nivo: 3.52 (95% CI: 1.73–7.18), p = 0.001]. Compared with camrelizumab indirectly, pembrolizumab had slightly worse PFS [HRpembro/cam: 1.33 (95% CI: 0.99–1.79), p = 0.057] and comparable ORR [RRpembro/cam: 0.71 (95% CI: 0.32–1.60; p = 0.41)]. Camrelizumab had a significantly higher rate of all grade TRAEs than both pembrolizumab and nivolumab. CONCLUSIONS: Combining the safety and potential survival benefit, we recommend nivolumab for ESCC patients with PS score of 1 and pembrolizumab or camrelizumab for patients with better PS and seeking for higher efficacy or longer PFS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8490758/ /pubmed/34621668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.698732 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhou, Chen, Sun, Zhang and Qiu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Zhou, Yi-Xin Chen, Ping Sun, Yu-Ting Zhang, Bei Qiu, Miao-Zhen Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting |
title | Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting |
title_full | Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting |
title_fullStr | Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting |
title_short | Comparison of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Second-Line Setting |
title_sort | comparison of pd-1 inhibitors in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the second-line setting |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.698732 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouyixin comparisonofpd1inhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomainthesecondlinesetting AT chenping comparisonofpd1inhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomainthesecondlinesetting AT sunyuting comparisonofpd1inhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomainthesecondlinesetting AT zhangbei comparisonofpd1inhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomainthesecondlinesetting AT qiumiaozhen comparisonofpd1inhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomainthesecondlinesetting |