Cargando…
Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality
In the presence of a continually changing sensory environment, maintaining stable but flexible awareness is paramount, and requires continual organization of information. Determining which stimulus features belong together, and which are separate is therefore one of the primary tasks of the sensory...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621219 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720131 |
_version_ | 1784578601834774528 |
---|---|
author | Higgins, Nathan C. Monjaras, Ambar G. Yerkes, Breanne D. Little, David F. Nave-Blodgett, Jessica E. Elhilali, Mounya Snyder, Joel S. |
author_facet | Higgins, Nathan C. Monjaras, Ambar G. Yerkes, Breanne D. Little, David F. Nave-Blodgett, Jessica E. Elhilali, Mounya Snyder, Joel S. |
author_sort | Higgins, Nathan C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the presence of a continually changing sensory environment, maintaining stable but flexible awareness is paramount, and requires continual organization of information. Determining which stimulus features belong together, and which are separate is therefore one of the primary tasks of the sensory systems. Unknown is whether there is a global or sensory-specific mechanism that regulates the final perceptual outcome of this streaming process. To test the extent of modality independence in perceptual control, an auditory streaming experiment, and a visual moving-plaid experiment were performed. Both were designed to evoke alternating perception of an integrated or segregated percept. In both experiments, transient auditory and visual distractor stimuli were presented in separate blocks, such that the distractors did not overlap in frequency or space with the streaming or plaid stimuli, respectively, thus preventing peripheral interference. When a distractor was presented in the opposite modality as the bistable stimulus (visual distractors during auditory streaming or auditory distractors during visual streaming), the probability of percept switching was not significantly different than when no distractor was presented. Conversely, significant differences in switch probability were observed following within-modality distractors, but only when the pre-distractor percept was segregated. Due to the modality-specificity of the distractor-induced resetting, the results suggest that conscious perception is at least partially controlled by modality-specific processing. The fact that the distractors did not have peripheral overlap with the bistable stimuli indicates that the perceptual reset is due to interference at a locus in which stimuli of different frequencies and spatial locations are integrated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8490814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84908142021-10-06 Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality Higgins, Nathan C. Monjaras, Ambar G. Yerkes, Breanne D. Little, David F. Nave-Blodgett, Jessica E. Elhilali, Mounya Snyder, Joel S. Front Psychol Psychology In the presence of a continually changing sensory environment, maintaining stable but flexible awareness is paramount, and requires continual organization of information. Determining which stimulus features belong together, and which are separate is therefore one of the primary tasks of the sensory systems. Unknown is whether there is a global or sensory-specific mechanism that regulates the final perceptual outcome of this streaming process. To test the extent of modality independence in perceptual control, an auditory streaming experiment, and a visual moving-plaid experiment were performed. Both were designed to evoke alternating perception of an integrated or segregated percept. In both experiments, transient auditory and visual distractor stimuli were presented in separate blocks, such that the distractors did not overlap in frequency or space with the streaming or plaid stimuli, respectively, thus preventing peripheral interference. When a distractor was presented in the opposite modality as the bistable stimulus (visual distractors during auditory streaming or auditory distractors during visual streaming), the probability of percept switching was not significantly different than when no distractor was presented. Conversely, significant differences in switch probability were observed following within-modality distractors, but only when the pre-distractor percept was segregated. Due to the modality-specificity of the distractor-induced resetting, the results suggest that conscious perception is at least partially controlled by modality-specific processing. The fact that the distractors did not have peripheral overlap with the bistable stimuli indicates that the perceptual reset is due to interference at a locus in which stimuli of different frequencies and spatial locations are integrated. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8490814/ /pubmed/34621219 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720131 Text en Copyright © 2021 Higgins, Monjaras, Yerkes, Little, Nave-Blodgett, Elhilali and Snyder. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Higgins, Nathan C. Monjaras, Ambar G. Yerkes, Breanne D. Little, David F. Nave-Blodgett, Jessica E. Elhilali, Mounya Snyder, Joel S. Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality |
title | Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality |
title_full | Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality |
title_fullStr | Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality |
title_full_unstemmed | Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality |
title_short | Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality |
title_sort | resetting of auditory and visual segregation occurs after transient stimuli of the same modality |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621219 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720131 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT higginsnathanc resettingofauditoryandvisualsegregationoccursaftertransientstimuliofthesamemodality AT monjarasambarg resettingofauditoryandvisualsegregationoccursaftertransientstimuliofthesamemodality AT yerkesbreanned resettingofauditoryandvisualsegregationoccursaftertransientstimuliofthesamemodality AT littledavidf resettingofauditoryandvisualsegregationoccursaftertransientstimuliofthesamemodality AT naveblodgettjessicae resettingofauditoryandvisualsegregationoccursaftertransientstimuliofthesamemodality AT elhilalimounya resettingofauditoryandvisualsegregationoccursaftertransientstimuliofthesamemodality AT snyderjoels resettingofauditoryandvisualsegregationoccursaftertransientstimuliofthesamemodality |