Cargando…

Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality

In the presence of a continually changing sensory environment, maintaining stable but flexible awareness is paramount, and requires continual organization of information. Determining which stimulus features belong together, and which are separate is therefore one of the primary tasks of the sensory...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Higgins, Nathan C., Monjaras, Ambar G., Yerkes, Breanne D., Little, David F., Nave-Blodgett, Jessica E., Elhilali, Mounya, Snyder, Joel S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621219
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720131
_version_ 1784578601834774528
author Higgins, Nathan C.
Monjaras, Ambar G.
Yerkes, Breanne D.
Little, David F.
Nave-Blodgett, Jessica E.
Elhilali, Mounya
Snyder, Joel S.
author_facet Higgins, Nathan C.
Monjaras, Ambar G.
Yerkes, Breanne D.
Little, David F.
Nave-Blodgett, Jessica E.
Elhilali, Mounya
Snyder, Joel S.
author_sort Higgins, Nathan C.
collection PubMed
description In the presence of a continually changing sensory environment, maintaining stable but flexible awareness is paramount, and requires continual organization of information. Determining which stimulus features belong together, and which are separate is therefore one of the primary tasks of the sensory systems. Unknown is whether there is a global or sensory-specific mechanism that regulates the final perceptual outcome of this streaming process. To test the extent of modality independence in perceptual control, an auditory streaming experiment, and a visual moving-plaid experiment were performed. Both were designed to evoke alternating perception of an integrated or segregated percept. In both experiments, transient auditory and visual distractor stimuli were presented in separate blocks, such that the distractors did not overlap in frequency or space with the streaming or plaid stimuli, respectively, thus preventing peripheral interference. When a distractor was presented in the opposite modality as the bistable stimulus (visual distractors during auditory streaming or auditory distractors during visual streaming), the probability of percept switching was not significantly different than when no distractor was presented. Conversely, significant differences in switch probability were observed following within-modality distractors, but only when the pre-distractor percept was segregated. Due to the modality-specificity of the distractor-induced resetting, the results suggest that conscious perception is at least partially controlled by modality-specific processing. The fact that the distractors did not have peripheral overlap with the bistable stimuli indicates that the perceptual reset is due to interference at a locus in which stimuli of different frequencies and spatial locations are integrated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8490814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84908142021-10-06 Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality Higgins, Nathan C. Monjaras, Ambar G. Yerkes, Breanne D. Little, David F. Nave-Blodgett, Jessica E. Elhilali, Mounya Snyder, Joel S. Front Psychol Psychology In the presence of a continually changing sensory environment, maintaining stable but flexible awareness is paramount, and requires continual organization of information. Determining which stimulus features belong together, and which are separate is therefore one of the primary tasks of the sensory systems. Unknown is whether there is a global or sensory-specific mechanism that regulates the final perceptual outcome of this streaming process. To test the extent of modality independence in perceptual control, an auditory streaming experiment, and a visual moving-plaid experiment were performed. Both were designed to evoke alternating perception of an integrated or segregated percept. In both experiments, transient auditory and visual distractor stimuli were presented in separate blocks, such that the distractors did not overlap in frequency or space with the streaming or plaid stimuli, respectively, thus preventing peripheral interference. When a distractor was presented in the opposite modality as the bistable stimulus (visual distractors during auditory streaming or auditory distractors during visual streaming), the probability of percept switching was not significantly different than when no distractor was presented. Conversely, significant differences in switch probability were observed following within-modality distractors, but only when the pre-distractor percept was segregated. Due to the modality-specificity of the distractor-induced resetting, the results suggest that conscious perception is at least partially controlled by modality-specific processing. The fact that the distractors did not have peripheral overlap with the bistable stimuli indicates that the perceptual reset is due to interference at a locus in which stimuli of different frequencies and spatial locations are integrated. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8490814/ /pubmed/34621219 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720131 Text en Copyright © 2021 Higgins, Monjaras, Yerkes, Little, Nave-Blodgett, Elhilali and Snyder. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Higgins, Nathan C.
Monjaras, Ambar G.
Yerkes, Breanne D.
Little, David F.
Nave-Blodgett, Jessica E.
Elhilali, Mounya
Snyder, Joel S.
Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality
title Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality
title_full Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality
title_fullStr Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality
title_full_unstemmed Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality
title_short Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality
title_sort resetting of auditory and visual segregation occurs after transient stimuli of the same modality
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8490814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621219
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720131
work_keys_str_mv AT higginsnathanc resettingofauditoryandvisualsegregationoccursaftertransientstimuliofthesamemodality
AT monjarasambarg resettingofauditoryandvisualsegregationoccursaftertransientstimuliofthesamemodality
AT yerkesbreanned resettingofauditoryandvisualsegregationoccursaftertransientstimuliofthesamemodality
AT littledavidf resettingofauditoryandvisualsegregationoccursaftertransientstimuliofthesamemodality
AT naveblodgettjessicae resettingofauditoryandvisualsegregationoccursaftertransientstimuliofthesamemodality
AT elhilalimounya resettingofauditoryandvisualsegregationoccursaftertransientstimuliofthesamemodality
AT snyderjoels resettingofauditoryandvisualsegregationoccursaftertransientstimuliofthesamemodality