Cargando…
(18)F-FET and (18)F-choline PET-CT in patients with MRI-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study
AIM: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of O-(2-[(18)F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ((18)F-FET) and fluoromethyl-((18)F)-dimethyl-2-hydroxyethyl-ammonium chloride ((18)F-FCH) computed tomography (CT) in patients with primary low-grade gliomas (LGG). METHODS: The study enrolled patients with magnetic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Croatian Medical Schools
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8491050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34472733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2021.62.310 |
_version_ | 1784578671418277888 |
---|---|
author | Mišir Krpan, Ana Hodolič, Marina Golubić, Anja Tea Baučić, Maja Nemir, Jakob Mrak, Goran Žuvić, Marijan Huić, Dražen |
author_facet | Mišir Krpan, Ana Hodolič, Marina Golubić, Anja Tea Baučić, Maja Nemir, Jakob Mrak, Goran Žuvić, Marijan Huić, Dražen |
author_sort | Mišir Krpan, Ana |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of O-(2-[(18)F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ((18)F-FET) and fluoromethyl-((18)F)-dimethyl-2-hydroxyethyl-ammonium chloride ((18)F-FCH) computed tomography (CT) in patients with primary low-grade gliomas (LGG). METHODS: The study enrolled patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-suspected LGG. Patients underwent both (18)F-FET and (18)F-FCH positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. Brain PET-CT was performed according to standard protocol – 20 minutes after intravenous injection of 185 MBq of (18)F-FET and 185 MBq of (18)F-FCH PET. Surgery and pathohistological diagnosis were performed in the next two weeks. RESULTS: We observed significantly better concordance between tumor histology and (18)F-FET PET (weighted Kappa 0.74) compared with both (18)F-FCH (weighted Kappa 0.15) and MRI (weighted Kappa 0.00). Tumor histology was significantly associated with (18)F-FET (odds ratio 12.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-333.70; P = 0.013, logistic regression analysis). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis comparing (18)F-FCH (area under the curve [AUC] 0.625, 95% CI 0.298-0.884) and (18)F-FET (AUC 0.833, 95% CI 0.499-0.982) showed better diagnostic properties of (18)F-FET (AUC difference 0.208, 95% CI -0.145 to 0.562, P = 0.248). CONCLUSION: Performing PET-CT in patients with newly diagnosed LGG should be preceded by a selection of an appropriate radiopharmaceutical. (18)F-FET seems to be more accurate than (18)F-FCH in the LGG diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8491050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Croatian Medical Schools |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84910502021-10-13 (18)F-FET and (18)F-choline PET-CT in patients with MRI-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study Mišir Krpan, Ana Hodolič, Marina Golubić, Anja Tea Baučić, Maja Nemir, Jakob Mrak, Goran Žuvić, Marijan Huić, Dražen Croat Med J Research Article AIM: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of O-(2-[(18)F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ((18)F-FET) and fluoromethyl-((18)F)-dimethyl-2-hydroxyethyl-ammonium chloride ((18)F-FCH) computed tomography (CT) in patients with primary low-grade gliomas (LGG). METHODS: The study enrolled patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-suspected LGG. Patients underwent both (18)F-FET and (18)F-FCH positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. Brain PET-CT was performed according to standard protocol – 20 minutes after intravenous injection of 185 MBq of (18)F-FET and 185 MBq of (18)F-FCH PET. Surgery and pathohistological diagnosis were performed in the next two weeks. RESULTS: We observed significantly better concordance between tumor histology and (18)F-FET PET (weighted Kappa 0.74) compared with both (18)F-FCH (weighted Kappa 0.15) and MRI (weighted Kappa 0.00). Tumor histology was significantly associated with (18)F-FET (odds ratio 12.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-333.70; P = 0.013, logistic regression analysis). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis comparing (18)F-FCH (area under the curve [AUC] 0.625, 95% CI 0.298-0.884) and (18)F-FET (AUC 0.833, 95% CI 0.499-0.982) showed better diagnostic properties of (18)F-FET (AUC difference 0.208, 95% CI -0.145 to 0.562, P = 0.248). CONCLUSION: Performing PET-CT in patients with newly diagnosed LGG should be preceded by a selection of an appropriate radiopharmaceutical. (18)F-FET seems to be more accurate than (18)F-FCH in the LGG diagnosis. Croatian Medical Schools 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8491050/ /pubmed/34472733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2021.62.310 Text en Copyright © 2021 by the Croatian Medical Journal. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mišir Krpan, Ana Hodolič, Marina Golubić, Anja Tea Baučić, Maja Nemir, Jakob Mrak, Goran Žuvić, Marijan Huić, Dražen (18)F-FET and (18)F-choline PET-CT in patients with MRI-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study |
title | (18)F-FET and (18)F-choline PET-CT in patients with MRI-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study |
title_full | (18)F-FET and (18)F-choline PET-CT in patients with MRI-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study |
title_fullStr | (18)F-FET and (18)F-choline PET-CT in patients with MRI-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | (18)F-FET and (18)F-choline PET-CT in patients with MRI-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study |
title_short | (18)F-FET and (18)F-choline PET-CT in patients with MRI-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study |
title_sort | (18)f-fet and (18)f-choline pet-ct in patients with mri-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8491050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34472733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2021.62.310 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT misirkrpanana 18ffetand18fcholinepetctinpatientswithmrisuspectedlowgradegliomasapilotstudy AT hodolicmarina 18ffetand18fcholinepetctinpatientswithmrisuspectedlowgradegliomasapilotstudy AT golubicanjatea 18ffetand18fcholinepetctinpatientswithmrisuspectedlowgradegliomasapilotstudy AT baucicmaja 18ffetand18fcholinepetctinpatientswithmrisuspectedlowgradegliomasapilotstudy AT nemirjakob 18ffetand18fcholinepetctinpatientswithmrisuspectedlowgradegliomasapilotstudy AT mrakgoran 18ffetand18fcholinepetctinpatientswithmrisuspectedlowgradegliomasapilotstudy AT zuvicmarijan 18ffetand18fcholinepetctinpatientswithmrisuspectedlowgradegliomasapilotstudy AT huicdrazen 18ffetand18fcholinepetctinpatientswithmrisuspectedlowgradegliomasapilotstudy |