Cargando…

(18)F-FET and (18)F-choline PET-CT in patients with MRI-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of O-(2-[(18)F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ((18)F-FET) and fluoromethyl-((18)F)-dimethyl-2-hydroxyethyl-ammonium chloride ((18)F-FCH) computed tomography (CT) in patients with primary low-grade gliomas (LGG). METHODS: The study enrolled patients with magnetic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mišir Krpan, Ana, Hodolič, Marina, Golubić, Anja Tea, Baučić, Maja, Nemir, Jakob, Mrak, Goran, Žuvić, Marijan, Huić, Dražen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Croatian Medical Schools 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8491050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34472733
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2021.62.310
_version_ 1784578671418277888
author Mišir Krpan, Ana
Hodolič, Marina
Golubić, Anja Tea
Baučić, Maja
Nemir, Jakob
Mrak, Goran
Žuvić, Marijan
Huić, Dražen
author_facet Mišir Krpan, Ana
Hodolič, Marina
Golubić, Anja Tea
Baučić, Maja
Nemir, Jakob
Mrak, Goran
Žuvić, Marijan
Huić, Dražen
author_sort Mišir Krpan, Ana
collection PubMed
description AIM: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of O-(2-[(18)F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ((18)F-FET) and fluoromethyl-((18)F)-dimethyl-2-hydroxyethyl-ammonium chloride ((18)F-FCH) computed tomography (CT) in patients with primary low-grade gliomas (LGG). METHODS: The study enrolled patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-suspected LGG. Patients underwent both (18)F-FET and (18)F-FCH positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. Brain PET-CT was performed according to standard protocol – 20 minutes after intravenous injection of 185 MBq of (18)F-FET and 185 MBq of (18)F-FCH PET. Surgery and pathohistological diagnosis were performed in the next two weeks. RESULTS: We observed significantly better concordance between tumor histology and (18)F-FET PET (weighted Kappa 0.74) compared with both (18)F-FCH (weighted Kappa 0.15) and MRI (weighted Kappa 0.00). Tumor histology was significantly associated with (18)F-FET (odds ratio 12.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-333.70; P = 0.013, logistic regression analysis). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis comparing (18)F-FCH (area under the curve [AUC] 0.625, 95% CI 0.298-0.884) and (18)F-FET (AUC 0.833, 95% CI 0.499-0.982) showed better diagnostic properties of (18)F-FET (AUC difference 0.208, 95% CI -0.145 to 0.562, P = 0.248). CONCLUSION: Performing PET-CT in patients with newly diagnosed LGG should be preceded by a selection of an appropriate radiopharmaceutical. (18)F-FET seems to be more accurate than (18)F-FCH in the LGG diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8491050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Croatian Medical Schools
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84910502021-10-13 (18)F-FET and (18)F-choline PET-CT in patients with MRI-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study Mišir Krpan, Ana Hodolič, Marina Golubić, Anja Tea Baučić, Maja Nemir, Jakob Mrak, Goran Žuvić, Marijan Huić, Dražen Croat Med J Research Article AIM: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of O-(2-[(18)F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ((18)F-FET) and fluoromethyl-((18)F)-dimethyl-2-hydroxyethyl-ammonium chloride ((18)F-FCH) computed tomography (CT) in patients with primary low-grade gliomas (LGG). METHODS: The study enrolled patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-suspected LGG. Patients underwent both (18)F-FET and (18)F-FCH positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. Brain PET-CT was performed according to standard protocol – 20 minutes after intravenous injection of 185 MBq of (18)F-FET and 185 MBq of (18)F-FCH PET. Surgery and pathohistological diagnosis were performed in the next two weeks. RESULTS: We observed significantly better concordance between tumor histology and (18)F-FET PET (weighted Kappa 0.74) compared with both (18)F-FCH (weighted Kappa 0.15) and MRI (weighted Kappa 0.00). Tumor histology was significantly associated with (18)F-FET (odds ratio 12.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-333.70; P = 0.013, logistic regression analysis). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis comparing (18)F-FCH (area under the curve [AUC] 0.625, 95% CI 0.298-0.884) and (18)F-FET (AUC 0.833, 95% CI 0.499-0.982) showed better diagnostic properties of (18)F-FET (AUC difference 0.208, 95% CI -0.145 to 0.562, P = 0.248). CONCLUSION: Performing PET-CT in patients with newly diagnosed LGG should be preceded by a selection of an appropriate radiopharmaceutical. (18)F-FET seems to be more accurate than (18)F-FCH in the LGG diagnosis. Croatian Medical Schools 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8491050/ /pubmed/34472733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2021.62.310 Text en Copyright © 2021 by the Croatian Medical Journal. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mišir Krpan, Ana
Hodolič, Marina
Golubić, Anja Tea
Baučić, Maja
Nemir, Jakob
Mrak, Goran
Žuvić, Marijan
Huić, Dražen
(18)F-FET and (18)F-choline PET-CT in patients with MRI-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study
title (18)F-FET and (18)F-choline PET-CT in patients with MRI-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study
title_full (18)F-FET and (18)F-choline PET-CT in patients with MRI-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study
title_fullStr (18)F-FET and (18)F-choline PET-CT in patients with MRI-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed (18)F-FET and (18)F-choline PET-CT in patients with MRI-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study
title_short (18)F-FET and (18)F-choline PET-CT in patients with MRI-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study
title_sort (18)f-fet and (18)f-choline pet-ct in patients with mri-suspected low-grade gliomas: a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8491050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34472733
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2021.62.310
work_keys_str_mv AT misirkrpanana 18ffetand18fcholinepetctinpatientswithmrisuspectedlowgradegliomasapilotstudy
AT hodolicmarina 18ffetand18fcholinepetctinpatientswithmrisuspectedlowgradegliomasapilotstudy
AT golubicanjatea 18ffetand18fcholinepetctinpatientswithmrisuspectedlowgradegliomasapilotstudy
AT baucicmaja 18ffetand18fcholinepetctinpatientswithmrisuspectedlowgradegliomasapilotstudy
AT nemirjakob 18ffetand18fcholinepetctinpatientswithmrisuspectedlowgradegliomasapilotstudy
AT mrakgoran 18ffetand18fcholinepetctinpatientswithmrisuspectedlowgradegliomasapilotstudy
AT zuvicmarijan 18ffetand18fcholinepetctinpatientswithmrisuspectedlowgradegliomasapilotstudy
AT huicdrazen 18ffetand18fcholinepetctinpatientswithmrisuspectedlowgradegliomasapilotstudy