Cargando…

Assessing the quality of care for children attending health facilities: a systematic review of assessment tools

INTRODUCTION: Assessing quality of healthcare is integral in determining progress towards equitable health outcomes worldwide. Using the WHO ‘Standards for improving quality of care for children and young adolescents in health facilities’ as a reference standard, we aimed to evaluate existing tools...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quach, Alicia, Tosif, Shidan, Nababan, Herfina, Duke, Trevor, Graham, Stephen M, Were, Wilson M, Muzigaba, Moise, Russell, Fiona M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8491295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34607894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006804
_version_ 1784578710924427264
author Quach, Alicia
Tosif, Shidan
Nababan, Herfina
Duke, Trevor
Graham, Stephen M
Were, Wilson M
Muzigaba, Moise
Russell, Fiona M
author_facet Quach, Alicia
Tosif, Shidan
Nababan, Herfina
Duke, Trevor
Graham, Stephen M
Were, Wilson M
Muzigaba, Moise
Russell, Fiona M
author_sort Quach, Alicia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Assessing quality of healthcare is integral in determining progress towards equitable health outcomes worldwide. Using the WHO ‘Standards for improving quality of care for children and young adolescents in health facilities’ as a reference standard, we aimed to evaluate existing tools that assess quality of care for children. METHODS: We undertook a systematic literature review of publications/reports between 2008 and 2020 that reported use of quality of care assessment tools for children (<15 years) in health facilities. Identified tools were reviewed against the 40 quality statements and 510 quality measures from the WHO Standards to determine the extent each tool was consistent with the WHO Standards. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO ID: CRD42020175652. RESULTS: Nine assessment tools met inclusion criteria. Two hospital care tools developed by WHO-Europe and WHO-South-East Asia Offices had the most consistency with the WHO Standards, assessing 291 (57·1%) and 208 (40·8%) of the 510 quality measures, respectively. Remaining tools included between 33 (6·5%) and 206 (40·4%) of the 510 quality measures. The WHO-Europe tool was the only tool to assess all 40 quality statements. The most common quality measures absent were related to experience of care, particularly provision of educational, emotional and psychosocial support to children and families, and fulfilment of children’s rights during care. CONCLUSION: Quality of care assessment tools for children in health facilities are missing some key elements highlighted by the WHO Standards. The WHO Standards are, however, extensive and applying all the quality measures in every setting may not be feasible. A consensus of key indicators to monitor the WHO Standards is required. Existing tools could be modified to include priority indicators to strengthen progress reporting towards delivering quality health services for children. In doing so, a balance between comprehensiveness and practical utility is needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020175652.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8491295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84912952021-10-14 Assessing the quality of care for children attending health facilities: a systematic review of assessment tools Quach, Alicia Tosif, Shidan Nababan, Herfina Duke, Trevor Graham, Stephen M Were, Wilson M Muzigaba, Moise Russell, Fiona M BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Assessing quality of healthcare is integral in determining progress towards equitable health outcomes worldwide. Using the WHO ‘Standards for improving quality of care for children and young adolescents in health facilities’ as a reference standard, we aimed to evaluate existing tools that assess quality of care for children. METHODS: We undertook a systematic literature review of publications/reports between 2008 and 2020 that reported use of quality of care assessment tools for children (<15 years) in health facilities. Identified tools were reviewed against the 40 quality statements and 510 quality measures from the WHO Standards to determine the extent each tool was consistent with the WHO Standards. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO ID: CRD42020175652. RESULTS: Nine assessment tools met inclusion criteria. Two hospital care tools developed by WHO-Europe and WHO-South-East Asia Offices had the most consistency with the WHO Standards, assessing 291 (57·1%) and 208 (40·8%) of the 510 quality measures, respectively. Remaining tools included between 33 (6·5%) and 206 (40·4%) of the 510 quality measures. The WHO-Europe tool was the only tool to assess all 40 quality statements. The most common quality measures absent were related to experience of care, particularly provision of educational, emotional and psychosocial support to children and families, and fulfilment of children’s rights during care. CONCLUSION: Quality of care assessment tools for children in health facilities are missing some key elements highlighted by the WHO Standards. The WHO Standards are, however, extensive and applying all the quality measures in every setting may not be feasible. A consensus of key indicators to monitor the WHO Standards is required. Existing tools could be modified to include priority indicators to strengthen progress reporting towards delivering quality health services for children. In doing so, a balance between comprehensiveness and practical utility is needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020175652. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8491295/ /pubmed/34607894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006804 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Quach, Alicia
Tosif, Shidan
Nababan, Herfina
Duke, Trevor
Graham, Stephen M
Were, Wilson M
Muzigaba, Moise
Russell, Fiona M
Assessing the quality of care for children attending health facilities: a systematic review of assessment tools
title Assessing the quality of care for children attending health facilities: a systematic review of assessment tools
title_full Assessing the quality of care for children attending health facilities: a systematic review of assessment tools
title_fullStr Assessing the quality of care for children attending health facilities: a systematic review of assessment tools
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the quality of care for children attending health facilities: a systematic review of assessment tools
title_short Assessing the quality of care for children attending health facilities: a systematic review of assessment tools
title_sort assessing the quality of care for children attending health facilities: a systematic review of assessment tools
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8491295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34607894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006804
work_keys_str_mv AT quachalicia assessingthequalityofcareforchildrenattendinghealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewofassessmenttools
AT tosifshidan assessingthequalityofcareforchildrenattendinghealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewofassessmenttools
AT nababanherfina assessingthequalityofcareforchildrenattendinghealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewofassessmenttools
AT duketrevor assessingthequalityofcareforchildrenattendinghealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewofassessmenttools
AT grahamstephenm assessingthequalityofcareforchildrenattendinghealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewofassessmenttools
AT werewilsonm assessingthequalityofcareforchildrenattendinghealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewofassessmenttools
AT muzigabamoise assessingthequalityofcareforchildrenattendinghealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewofassessmenttools
AT russellfionam assessingthequalityofcareforchildrenattendinghealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewofassessmenttools