Cargando…
Molecular profiling of advanced malignancies guides first-line N-of-1 treatments in the I-PREDICT treatment-naïve study
BACKGROUND: Malignancies are molecularly complex and become more resistant with each line of therapy. We hypothesized that offering matched, individualized combination therapies to patients with treatment-naïve, advanced cancers would be feasible and efficacious. Patients with newly diagnosed unrese...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8491393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34607609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-021-00969-w |
_version_ | 1784578733076643840 |
---|---|
author | Sicklick, Jason K. Kato, Shumei Okamura, Ryosuke Patel, Hitendra Nikanjam, Mina Fanta, Paul T. Hahn, Michael E. De, Pradip Williams, Casey Guido, Jessica Solomon, Benjamin M. McKay, Rana R. Krie, Amy Boles, Sarah G. Ross, Jeffrey S. Lee, J. Jack Leyland-Jones, Brian Lippman, Scott M. Kurzrock, Razelle |
author_facet | Sicklick, Jason K. Kato, Shumei Okamura, Ryosuke Patel, Hitendra Nikanjam, Mina Fanta, Paul T. Hahn, Michael E. De, Pradip Williams, Casey Guido, Jessica Solomon, Benjamin M. McKay, Rana R. Krie, Amy Boles, Sarah G. Ross, Jeffrey S. Lee, J. Jack Leyland-Jones, Brian Lippman, Scott M. Kurzrock, Razelle |
author_sort | Sicklick, Jason K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Malignancies are molecularly complex and become more resistant with each line of therapy. We hypothesized that offering matched, individualized combination therapies to patients with treatment-naïve, advanced cancers would be feasible and efficacious. Patients with newly diagnosed unresectable/metastatic, poor-prognosis cancers were enrolled in a cross-institutional prospective study. METHODS: A total of 145 patients were included in the study. Genomic profiling (tissue and/or circulating tumor DNA) was performed in all patients, and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, tumor mutational burden, and microsatellite status assessment were performed in a subset of patients. We evaluated safety and outcomes: disease-control rate (stable disease for ≥ 6 months or partial or complete response), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Seventy-six of 145 patients (52%) were treated, most commonly for non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancers, carcinomas of unknown primary, and hepatobiliary malignancies (53% women; median age, 63 years). The median number of deleterious genomic alterations per patient was 5 (range, 0–15). Fifty-four treated patients (71%) received ≥ 1 molecularly matched therapy, demonstrating the feasibility of administering molecularly matched therapy. The Matching Score, which reflects the percentage of targeted alterations, correlated linearly with progression-free survival (R(2) = 0.92; P = 0.01), and high (≥ 60%) Matching Score was an independent predictor of improved disease control rate [OR 3.31 (95% CI 1.01–10.83), P = 0.048], PFS [HR 0.55 (0.28–1.07), P = 0.08], and OS [HR 0.42 (0.21–0.85), P = 0.02]. Serious adverse event rates were similar in the unmatched and matched groups. CONCLUSIONS: Personalized combination therapies targeting a majority of a patient’s molecular alterations have antitumor activity as first-line treatment. These findings underscore the feasibility and importance of using tailored N-of-1 combination therapies early in the course of lethal malignancies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: I-PREDICT (NCT02534675) was registered on August 25, 2015. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13073-021-00969-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8491393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84913932021-10-05 Molecular profiling of advanced malignancies guides first-line N-of-1 treatments in the I-PREDICT treatment-naïve study Sicklick, Jason K. Kato, Shumei Okamura, Ryosuke Patel, Hitendra Nikanjam, Mina Fanta, Paul T. Hahn, Michael E. De, Pradip Williams, Casey Guido, Jessica Solomon, Benjamin M. McKay, Rana R. Krie, Amy Boles, Sarah G. Ross, Jeffrey S. Lee, J. Jack Leyland-Jones, Brian Lippman, Scott M. Kurzrock, Razelle Genome Med Research BACKGROUND: Malignancies are molecularly complex and become more resistant with each line of therapy. We hypothesized that offering matched, individualized combination therapies to patients with treatment-naïve, advanced cancers would be feasible and efficacious. Patients with newly diagnosed unresectable/metastatic, poor-prognosis cancers were enrolled in a cross-institutional prospective study. METHODS: A total of 145 patients were included in the study. Genomic profiling (tissue and/or circulating tumor DNA) was performed in all patients, and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, tumor mutational burden, and microsatellite status assessment were performed in a subset of patients. We evaluated safety and outcomes: disease-control rate (stable disease for ≥ 6 months or partial or complete response), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Seventy-six of 145 patients (52%) were treated, most commonly for non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancers, carcinomas of unknown primary, and hepatobiliary malignancies (53% women; median age, 63 years). The median number of deleterious genomic alterations per patient was 5 (range, 0–15). Fifty-four treated patients (71%) received ≥ 1 molecularly matched therapy, demonstrating the feasibility of administering molecularly matched therapy. The Matching Score, which reflects the percentage of targeted alterations, correlated linearly with progression-free survival (R(2) = 0.92; P = 0.01), and high (≥ 60%) Matching Score was an independent predictor of improved disease control rate [OR 3.31 (95% CI 1.01–10.83), P = 0.048], PFS [HR 0.55 (0.28–1.07), P = 0.08], and OS [HR 0.42 (0.21–0.85), P = 0.02]. Serious adverse event rates were similar in the unmatched and matched groups. CONCLUSIONS: Personalized combination therapies targeting a majority of a patient’s molecular alterations have antitumor activity as first-line treatment. These findings underscore the feasibility and importance of using tailored N-of-1 combination therapies early in the course of lethal malignancies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: I-PREDICT (NCT02534675) was registered on August 25, 2015. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13073-021-00969-w. BioMed Central 2021-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8491393/ /pubmed/34607609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-021-00969-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sicklick, Jason K. Kato, Shumei Okamura, Ryosuke Patel, Hitendra Nikanjam, Mina Fanta, Paul T. Hahn, Michael E. De, Pradip Williams, Casey Guido, Jessica Solomon, Benjamin M. McKay, Rana R. Krie, Amy Boles, Sarah G. Ross, Jeffrey S. Lee, J. Jack Leyland-Jones, Brian Lippman, Scott M. Kurzrock, Razelle Molecular profiling of advanced malignancies guides first-line N-of-1 treatments in the I-PREDICT treatment-naïve study |
title | Molecular profiling of advanced malignancies guides first-line N-of-1 treatments in the I-PREDICT treatment-naïve study |
title_full | Molecular profiling of advanced malignancies guides first-line N-of-1 treatments in the I-PREDICT treatment-naïve study |
title_fullStr | Molecular profiling of advanced malignancies guides first-line N-of-1 treatments in the I-PREDICT treatment-naïve study |
title_full_unstemmed | Molecular profiling of advanced malignancies guides first-line N-of-1 treatments in the I-PREDICT treatment-naïve study |
title_short | Molecular profiling of advanced malignancies guides first-line N-of-1 treatments in the I-PREDICT treatment-naïve study |
title_sort | molecular profiling of advanced malignancies guides first-line n-of-1 treatments in the i-predict treatment-naïve study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8491393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34607609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-021-00969-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sicklickjasonk molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT katoshumei molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT okamuraryosuke molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT patelhitendra molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT nikanjammina molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT fantapault molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT hahnmichaele molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT depradip molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT williamscasey molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT guidojessica molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT solomonbenjaminm molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT mckayranar molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT krieamy molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT bolessarahg molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT rossjeffreys molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT leejjack molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT leylandjonesbrian molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT lippmanscottm molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy AT kurzrockrazelle molecularprofilingofadvancedmalignanciesguidesfirstlinenof1treatmentsintheipredicttreatmentnaivestudy |