Cargando…
The National COVID Cohort Collaborative: Analyses of Original and Computationally Derived Electronic Health Record Data
BACKGROUND: Computationally derived (“synthetic”) data can enable the creation and analysis of clinical, laboratory, and diagnostic data as if they were the original electronic health record data. Synthetic data can support data sharing to answer critical research questions to address the COVID-19 p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8491642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34559671 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30697 |
_version_ | 1784578769316478976 |
---|---|
author | Foraker, Randi Guo, Aixia Thomas, Jason Zamstein, Noa Payne, Philip RO Wilcox, Adam |
author_facet | Foraker, Randi Guo, Aixia Thomas, Jason Zamstein, Noa Payne, Philip RO Wilcox, Adam |
author_sort | Foraker, Randi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Computationally derived (“synthetic”) data can enable the creation and analysis of clinical, laboratory, and diagnostic data as if they were the original electronic health record data. Synthetic data can support data sharing to answer critical research questions to address the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: We aim to compare the results from analyses of synthetic data to those from original data and assess the strengths and limitations of leveraging computationally derived data for research purposes. METHODS: We used the National COVID Cohort Collaborative’s instance of MDClone, a big data platform with data-synthesizing capabilities (MDClone Ltd). We downloaded electronic health record data from 34 National COVID Cohort Collaborative institutional partners and tested three use cases, including (1) exploring the distributions of key features of the COVID-19–positive cohort; (2) training and testing predictive models for assessing the risk of admission among these patients; and (3) determining geospatial and temporal COVID-19–related measures and outcomes, and constructing their epidemic curves. We compared the results from synthetic data to those from original data using traditional statistics, machine learning approaches, and temporal and spatial representations of the data. RESULTS: For each use case, the results of the synthetic data analyses successfully mimicked those of the original data such that the distributions of the data were similar and the predictive models demonstrated comparable performance. Although the synthetic and original data yielded overall nearly the same results, there were exceptions that included an odds ratio on either side of the null in multivariable analyses (0.97 vs 1.01) and differences in the magnitude of epidemic curves constructed for zip codes with low population counts. CONCLUSIONS: This paper presents the results of each use case and outlines key considerations for the use of synthetic data, examining their role in collaborative research for faster insights. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8491642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84916422021-12-07 The National COVID Cohort Collaborative: Analyses of Original and Computationally Derived Electronic Health Record Data Foraker, Randi Guo, Aixia Thomas, Jason Zamstein, Noa Payne, Philip RO Wilcox, Adam J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Computationally derived (“synthetic”) data can enable the creation and analysis of clinical, laboratory, and diagnostic data as if they were the original electronic health record data. Synthetic data can support data sharing to answer critical research questions to address the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: We aim to compare the results from analyses of synthetic data to those from original data and assess the strengths and limitations of leveraging computationally derived data for research purposes. METHODS: We used the National COVID Cohort Collaborative’s instance of MDClone, a big data platform with data-synthesizing capabilities (MDClone Ltd). We downloaded electronic health record data from 34 National COVID Cohort Collaborative institutional partners and tested three use cases, including (1) exploring the distributions of key features of the COVID-19–positive cohort; (2) training and testing predictive models for assessing the risk of admission among these patients; and (3) determining geospatial and temporal COVID-19–related measures and outcomes, and constructing their epidemic curves. We compared the results from synthetic data to those from original data using traditional statistics, machine learning approaches, and temporal and spatial representations of the data. RESULTS: For each use case, the results of the synthetic data analyses successfully mimicked those of the original data such that the distributions of the data were similar and the predictive models demonstrated comparable performance. Although the synthetic and original data yielded overall nearly the same results, there were exceptions that included an odds ratio on either side of the null in multivariable analyses (0.97 vs 1.01) and differences in the magnitude of epidemic curves constructed for zip codes with low population counts. CONCLUSIONS: This paper presents the results of each use case and outlines key considerations for the use of synthetic data, examining their role in collaborative research for faster insights. JMIR Publications 2021-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8491642/ /pubmed/34559671 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30697 Text en ©Randi Foraker, Aixia Guo, Jason Thomas, Noa Zamstein, Philip RO Payne, Adam Wilcox, N3C Collaborative. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 04.10.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Foraker, Randi Guo, Aixia Thomas, Jason Zamstein, Noa Payne, Philip RO Wilcox, Adam The National COVID Cohort Collaborative: Analyses of Original and Computationally Derived Electronic Health Record Data |
title | The National COVID Cohort Collaborative: Analyses of Original and Computationally Derived Electronic Health Record Data |
title_full | The National COVID Cohort Collaborative: Analyses of Original and Computationally Derived Electronic Health Record Data |
title_fullStr | The National COVID Cohort Collaborative: Analyses of Original and Computationally Derived Electronic Health Record Data |
title_full_unstemmed | The National COVID Cohort Collaborative: Analyses of Original and Computationally Derived Electronic Health Record Data |
title_short | The National COVID Cohort Collaborative: Analyses of Original and Computationally Derived Electronic Health Record Data |
title_sort | national covid cohort collaborative: analyses of original and computationally derived electronic health record data |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8491642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34559671 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30697 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forakerrandi thenationalcovidcohortcollaborativeanalysesoforiginalandcomputationallyderivedelectronichealthrecorddata AT guoaixia thenationalcovidcohortcollaborativeanalysesoforiginalandcomputationallyderivedelectronichealthrecorddata AT thomasjason thenationalcovidcohortcollaborativeanalysesoforiginalandcomputationallyderivedelectronichealthrecorddata AT zamsteinnoa thenationalcovidcohortcollaborativeanalysesoforiginalandcomputationallyderivedelectronichealthrecorddata AT paynephilipro thenationalcovidcohortcollaborativeanalysesoforiginalandcomputationallyderivedelectronichealthrecorddata AT wilcoxadam thenationalcovidcohortcollaborativeanalysesoforiginalandcomputationallyderivedelectronichealthrecorddata AT thenationalcovidcohortcollaborativeanalysesoforiginalandcomputationallyderivedelectronichealthrecorddata AT forakerrandi nationalcovidcohortcollaborativeanalysesoforiginalandcomputationallyderivedelectronichealthrecorddata AT guoaixia nationalcovidcohortcollaborativeanalysesoforiginalandcomputationallyderivedelectronichealthrecorddata AT thomasjason nationalcovidcohortcollaborativeanalysesoforiginalandcomputationallyderivedelectronichealthrecorddata AT zamsteinnoa nationalcovidcohortcollaborativeanalysesoforiginalandcomputationallyderivedelectronichealthrecorddata AT paynephilipro nationalcovidcohortcollaborativeanalysesoforiginalandcomputationallyderivedelectronichealthrecorddata AT wilcoxadam nationalcovidcohortcollaborativeanalysesoforiginalandcomputationallyderivedelectronichealthrecorddata AT nationalcovidcohortcollaborativeanalysesoforiginalandcomputationallyderivedelectronichealthrecorddata |