Cargando…

U.S. frontline workers and COVID-19 inequities

We overcome a lack of frontline worker status information in most COVID-19 data repositories to document the extent to which occupation has contributed to COVID-19 disparities in the United States. Using national data from over a million U.S. respondents to a Facebook-Carnegie Mellon University surv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Do, D. Phuong, Frank, Reanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34624386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106833
_version_ 1784578910831247360
author Do, D. Phuong
Frank, Reanne
author_facet Do, D. Phuong
Frank, Reanne
author_sort Do, D. Phuong
collection PubMed
description We overcome a lack of frontline worker status information in most COVID-19 data repositories to document the extent to which occupation has contributed to COVID-19 disparities in the United States. Using national data from over a million U.S. respondents to a Facebook-Carnegie Mellon University survey administered from September 2020 to March 2021, we estimated the likelihoods of frontline workers, compared to non-frontline workers, 1) to ever test positive for SARs-Cov-2 and 2) to test positive for SARs-Cov-2 within the past two weeks. Net of other covariates including education level, county-level political environment, and rural residence, both healthcare and non-healthcare frontline workers had higher odds of having ever tested positive for SARs-Cov-2 across the study time period. Similarly, non-healthcare frontline workers were more likely to test positive in the previous 14 days. Conversely, healthcare frontline workers were less likely to have recently tested positive. Our findings suggest that occupational exposure has played an independent role in the uneven spread of the virus. In particular, non-healthcare frontline workers have experienced sustained higher risk of testing positive for SARs-Cov-2 compared to non-frontline workers. Alongside more worker protections, future COVID-19 and other highly infectious disease response strategies must be augmented by a more robust recognition of the role that structural factors, such as the highly stratified U.S. occupational landscape, have played in the uneven toll of the COVID-19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8492358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84923582021-10-06 U.S. frontline workers and COVID-19 inequities Do, D. Phuong Frank, Reanne Prev Med Article We overcome a lack of frontline worker status information in most COVID-19 data repositories to document the extent to which occupation has contributed to COVID-19 disparities in the United States. Using national data from over a million U.S. respondents to a Facebook-Carnegie Mellon University survey administered from September 2020 to March 2021, we estimated the likelihoods of frontline workers, compared to non-frontline workers, 1) to ever test positive for SARs-Cov-2 and 2) to test positive for SARs-Cov-2 within the past two weeks. Net of other covariates including education level, county-level political environment, and rural residence, both healthcare and non-healthcare frontline workers had higher odds of having ever tested positive for SARs-Cov-2 across the study time period. Similarly, non-healthcare frontline workers were more likely to test positive in the previous 14 days. Conversely, healthcare frontline workers were less likely to have recently tested positive. Our findings suggest that occupational exposure has played an independent role in the uneven spread of the virus. In particular, non-healthcare frontline workers have experienced sustained higher risk of testing positive for SARs-Cov-2 compared to non-frontline workers. Alongside more worker protections, future COVID-19 and other highly infectious disease response strategies must be augmented by a more robust recognition of the role that structural factors, such as the highly stratified U.S. occupational landscape, have played in the uneven toll of the COVID-19 pandemic. Elsevier Inc. 2021-12 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8492358/ /pubmed/34624386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106833 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Do, D. Phuong
Frank, Reanne
U.S. frontline workers and COVID-19 inequities
title U.S. frontline workers and COVID-19 inequities
title_full U.S. frontline workers and COVID-19 inequities
title_fullStr U.S. frontline workers and COVID-19 inequities
title_full_unstemmed U.S. frontline workers and COVID-19 inequities
title_short U.S. frontline workers and COVID-19 inequities
title_sort u.s. frontline workers and covid-19 inequities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34624386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106833
work_keys_str_mv AT dodphuong usfrontlineworkersandcovid19inequities
AT frankreanne usfrontlineworkersandcovid19inequities