Cargando…
Companies Committed to Responsible AI: From Principles towards Implementation and Regulation?
The term ‘responsible AI’ has been coined to denote AI that is fair and non-biased, transparent and explainable, secure and safe, privacy-proof, accountable, and to the benefit of mankind. Since 2016, a great many organizations have pledged allegiance to such principles. Amongst them are 24 AI compa...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34631392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00474-3 |
_version_ | 1784578934183034880 |
---|---|
author | de Laat, Paul B. |
author_facet | de Laat, Paul B. |
author_sort | de Laat, Paul B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The term ‘responsible AI’ has been coined to denote AI that is fair and non-biased, transparent and explainable, secure and safe, privacy-proof, accountable, and to the benefit of mankind. Since 2016, a great many organizations have pledged allegiance to such principles. Amongst them are 24 AI companies that did so by posting a commitment of the kind on their website and/or by joining the ‘Partnership on AI’. By means of a comprehensive web search, two questions are addressed by this study: (1) Did the signatory companies actually try to implement these principles in practice, and if so, how? (2) What are their views on the role of other societal actors in steering AI towards the stated principles (the issue of regulation)? It is concluded that some three of the largest amongst them have carried out valuable steps towards implementation, in particular by developing and open sourcing new software tools. To them, charges of mere ‘ethics washing’ do not apply. Moreover, some 10 companies from both the USA and Europe have publicly endorsed the position that apart from self-regulation, AI is in urgent need of governmental regulation. They mostly advocate focussing regulation on high-risk applications of AI, a policy which to them represents the sensible middle course between laissez-faire on the one hand and outright bans on technologies on the other. The future shaping of standards, ethical codes, and laws as a result of these regulatory efforts remains, of course, to be determined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8492454 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84924542021-10-06 Companies Committed to Responsible AI: From Principles towards Implementation and Regulation? de Laat, Paul B. Philos Technol Research Article The term ‘responsible AI’ has been coined to denote AI that is fair and non-biased, transparent and explainable, secure and safe, privacy-proof, accountable, and to the benefit of mankind. Since 2016, a great many organizations have pledged allegiance to such principles. Amongst them are 24 AI companies that did so by posting a commitment of the kind on their website and/or by joining the ‘Partnership on AI’. By means of a comprehensive web search, two questions are addressed by this study: (1) Did the signatory companies actually try to implement these principles in practice, and if so, how? (2) What are their views on the role of other societal actors in steering AI towards the stated principles (the issue of regulation)? It is concluded that some three of the largest amongst them have carried out valuable steps towards implementation, in particular by developing and open sourcing new software tools. To them, charges of mere ‘ethics washing’ do not apply. Moreover, some 10 companies from both the USA and Europe have publicly endorsed the position that apart from self-regulation, AI is in urgent need of governmental regulation. They mostly advocate focussing regulation on high-risk applications of AI, a policy which to them represents the sensible middle course between laissez-faire on the one hand and outright bans on technologies on the other. The future shaping of standards, ethical codes, and laws as a result of these regulatory efforts remains, of course, to be determined. Springer Netherlands 2021-10-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8492454/ /pubmed/34631392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00474-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Laat, Paul B. Companies Committed to Responsible AI: From Principles towards Implementation and Regulation? |
title | Companies Committed to Responsible AI: From Principles towards Implementation and Regulation? |
title_full | Companies Committed to Responsible AI: From Principles towards Implementation and Regulation? |
title_fullStr | Companies Committed to Responsible AI: From Principles towards Implementation and Regulation? |
title_full_unstemmed | Companies Committed to Responsible AI: From Principles towards Implementation and Regulation? |
title_short | Companies Committed to Responsible AI: From Principles towards Implementation and Regulation? |
title_sort | companies committed to responsible ai: from principles towards implementation and regulation? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34631392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00474-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delaatpaulb companiescommittedtoresponsibleaifromprinciplestowardsimplementationandregulation |