Cargando…

A prediction model using 2-propanol and 2-butanone in urine distinguishes breast cancer

Safe and noninvasive methods for breast cancer screening with improved accuracy are urgently needed. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in biological samples such as breath and blood have been investigated as noninvasive novel markers of cancer. We investigated volatile organic compounds in urine to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kure, Shoko, Satoi, Sera, Kitayama, Toshihiko, Nagase, Yuta, Nakano, Nobuo, Yamada, Marina, Uchiyama, Noboru, Miyashita, Satoshi, Iida, Shinya, Takei, Hiroyuki, Miyashita, Masao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34611278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99396-5
_version_ 1784578958079033344
author Kure, Shoko
Satoi, Sera
Kitayama, Toshihiko
Nagase, Yuta
Nakano, Nobuo
Yamada, Marina
Uchiyama, Noboru
Miyashita, Satoshi
Iida, Shinya
Takei, Hiroyuki
Miyashita, Masao
author_facet Kure, Shoko
Satoi, Sera
Kitayama, Toshihiko
Nagase, Yuta
Nakano, Nobuo
Yamada, Marina
Uchiyama, Noboru
Miyashita, Satoshi
Iida, Shinya
Takei, Hiroyuki
Miyashita, Masao
author_sort Kure, Shoko
collection PubMed
description Safe and noninvasive methods for breast cancer screening with improved accuracy are urgently needed. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in biological samples such as breath and blood have been investigated as noninvasive novel markers of cancer. We investigated volatile organic compounds in urine to assess their potential for the detection of breast cancer. One hundred and ten women with biopsy-proven breast cancer and 177 healthy volunteers were enrolled. The subjects were divided into two groups: a training set and an external validation set. Urine samples were collected and analyzed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. A predictive model was constructed by multivariate analysis, and the sensitivity and specificity of the model were confirmed using both a training set and an external set with reproducibility tests. The training set included 60 breast cancer patients (age 34–88 years, mean 60.3) and 60 healthy controls (age 34–81 years, mean 58.7). The external validation set included 50 breast cancer patients (age 35–85 years, mean 58.8) and 117 healthy controls (age 18–84 years, mean 51.2). One hundred and ninety-one compounds detected in at least 80% of the samples from the training set were used for further analysis. The predictive model that best-detected breast cancer at various clinical stages was constructed using a combination of two of the compounds, 2-propanol and 2-butanone. The sensitivity and specificity in the training set were 93.3% and 83.3%, respectively. Triplicated reproducibility tests were performed by randomly choosing ten samples from each group, and the results showed a matching rate of 100% for the breast cancer patient group and 90% for the healthy control group. Our prediction model using two VOCs is a useful complement to the current diagnostic tools. Further studies inclusive of benign tumors and non-breast malignancies are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8492640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84926402021-10-07 A prediction model using 2-propanol and 2-butanone in urine distinguishes breast cancer Kure, Shoko Satoi, Sera Kitayama, Toshihiko Nagase, Yuta Nakano, Nobuo Yamada, Marina Uchiyama, Noboru Miyashita, Satoshi Iida, Shinya Takei, Hiroyuki Miyashita, Masao Sci Rep Article Safe and noninvasive methods for breast cancer screening with improved accuracy are urgently needed. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in biological samples such as breath and blood have been investigated as noninvasive novel markers of cancer. We investigated volatile organic compounds in urine to assess their potential for the detection of breast cancer. One hundred and ten women with biopsy-proven breast cancer and 177 healthy volunteers were enrolled. The subjects were divided into two groups: a training set and an external validation set. Urine samples were collected and analyzed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. A predictive model was constructed by multivariate analysis, and the sensitivity and specificity of the model were confirmed using both a training set and an external set with reproducibility tests. The training set included 60 breast cancer patients (age 34–88 years, mean 60.3) and 60 healthy controls (age 34–81 years, mean 58.7). The external validation set included 50 breast cancer patients (age 35–85 years, mean 58.8) and 117 healthy controls (age 18–84 years, mean 51.2). One hundred and ninety-one compounds detected in at least 80% of the samples from the training set were used for further analysis. The predictive model that best-detected breast cancer at various clinical stages was constructed using a combination of two of the compounds, 2-propanol and 2-butanone. The sensitivity and specificity in the training set were 93.3% and 83.3%, respectively. Triplicated reproducibility tests were performed by randomly choosing ten samples from each group, and the results showed a matching rate of 100% for the breast cancer patient group and 90% for the healthy control group. Our prediction model using two VOCs is a useful complement to the current diagnostic tools. Further studies inclusive of benign tumors and non-breast malignancies are warranted. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8492640/ /pubmed/34611278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99396-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kure, Shoko
Satoi, Sera
Kitayama, Toshihiko
Nagase, Yuta
Nakano, Nobuo
Yamada, Marina
Uchiyama, Noboru
Miyashita, Satoshi
Iida, Shinya
Takei, Hiroyuki
Miyashita, Masao
A prediction model using 2-propanol and 2-butanone in urine distinguishes breast cancer
title A prediction model using 2-propanol and 2-butanone in urine distinguishes breast cancer
title_full A prediction model using 2-propanol and 2-butanone in urine distinguishes breast cancer
title_fullStr A prediction model using 2-propanol and 2-butanone in urine distinguishes breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed A prediction model using 2-propanol and 2-butanone in urine distinguishes breast cancer
title_short A prediction model using 2-propanol and 2-butanone in urine distinguishes breast cancer
title_sort prediction model using 2-propanol and 2-butanone in urine distinguishes breast cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34611278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99396-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kureshoko apredictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT satoisera apredictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT kitayamatoshihiko apredictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT nagaseyuta apredictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT nakanonobuo apredictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT yamadamarina apredictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT uchiyamanoboru apredictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT miyashitasatoshi apredictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT iidashinya apredictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT takeihiroyuki apredictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT miyashitamasao apredictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT kureshoko predictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT satoisera predictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT kitayamatoshihiko predictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT nagaseyuta predictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT nakanonobuo predictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT yamadamarina predictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT uchiyamanoboru predictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT miyashitasatoshi predictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT iidashinya predictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT takeihiroyuki predictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer
AT miyashitamasao predictionmodelusing2propanoland2butanoneinurinedistinguishesbreastcancer