Cargando…

Evaluation of a genus-specific rGroEL(1-524) IgM-ELISA and commercial ELISA kits during the course of leptospirosis in Thailand

In the present study, we developed a genus-specific rGroEL(1-524) IgM-ELISA assay for use in screening diagnosis of suspected leptospirosis among acute undifferentiated febrile illness patients during acute fever. The diagnostic accuracies of the rGroEL(1–524) IgM-ELISA, commercial Panbio IgM-ELISA,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maneewatchararangsri, Santi, Doungchawee, Galayanee, Kalambaheti, Thareerat, Luvira, Viravarn, Soonthornworasiri, Ngamphol, Vattanatham, Pisut, Chaisri, Urai, Adisakwattana, Poom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34611273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99377-8
Descripción
Sumario:In the present study, we developed a genus-specific rGroEL(1-524) IgM-ELISA assay for use in screening diagnosis of suspected leptospirosis among acute undifferentiated febrile illness patients during acute fever. The diagnostic accuracies of the rGroEL(1–524) IgM-ELISA, commercial Panbio IgM-ELISA, and Virion-Serion Classic IgG-ELISA were evaluated using 133 Thai leptospirosis sera and 210 controls. Sensitivities were 91.7%, 59.6%, and 17.7% for acute infection, and the specificities were 92.6%, 90.2%, and 88.3% for the non-leptospirosis control, respectively. The rGroEL(1-524) IgM-ELISA had high sensitivity, at 92.3% and 91.7%, among culture-positive and MAT-negative cases at 1–3 days post-onset of symptoms (DPO1–3), respectively. Impaired specificity on scrub typhus was found, possibly from antibody cross-reaction to ortholog GroEL. Commercial Panbio IgM-ELISA had sensitivities at DPO1–3 of 30.8% and 41.7% for culture-positive and MAT-negative cases whereas Virion-Serion IgG-ELISA showed sensitivities of 5.9% and 13.3%, respectively. The rGroEL(1-524) IgM-ELISA could be useful as a screening test for early diagnosis. The performance of the commercial ELISA suggests the applicability of IgM-ELISA for diagnosis, while IgG-ELISA is useful for seroprevalence surveys. However, confirmation by reference tests is recommended.