Cargando…
Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
To gain insight into changes of scholarly journals’ recommendations, we conducted a systematic review of studies that analysed journals’ Instructions to Authors (ItAs). We summarised results of 153 studies, and meta-analysed how often ItAs addressed: 1) authorship, 2) conflicts of interest, 3) data...
Autores principales: | Malički, Mario, Jerončić, Ana, Aalbersberg, IJsbrand Jan, Bouter, Lex, ter Riet, Gerben |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34611157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26027-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
Journals’ instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines
por: Malički, Mario, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines
por: Malički, Mario, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript? Analysis of open-ended responses of authors in a general medical journal
por: Malički, Mario, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity
por: Bouter, Lex M., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Correction to: ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity
por: Bouter, Lex M., et al.
Publicado: (2019)