Cargando…

Free versus bound entanglement, a NP-hard problem tackled by machine learning

Entanglement detection in high dimensional systems is a NP-hard problem since it is lacking an efficient way. Given a bipartite quantum state of interest free entanglement can be detected efficiently by the PPT-criterion (Peres-Horodecki criterion), in contrast to detecting bound entanglement, i.e....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hiesmayr, Beatrix C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34611192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98523-6
_version_ 1784578996479983616
author Hiesmayr, Beatrix C.
author_facet Hiesmayr, Beatrix C.
author_sort Hiesmayr, Beatrix C.
collection PubMed
description Entanglement detection in high dimensional systems is a NP-hard problem since it is lacking an efficient way. Given a bipartite quantum state of interest free entanglement can be detected efficiently by the PPT-criterion (Peres-Horodecki criterion), in contrast to detecting bound entanglement, i.e. a curious form of entanglement that can also not be distilled into maximally (free) entangled states. Only a few bound entangled states have been found, typically by constructing dedicated entanglement witnesses, so naturally the question arises how large is the volume of those states. We define a large family of magically symmetric states of bipartite qutrits for which we find [Formula: see text] to be free entangled, [Formula: see text] to be certainly separable and as much as [Formula: see text] to be bound entangled, which shows that this kind of entanglement is not rare. Via various machine learning algorithms we can confirm that the remaining [Formula: see text] of states are more likely to belonging to the set of separable states than bound entangled states. Most important we find via dimension reduction algorithms that there is a strong two-dimensional (linear) sub-structure in the set of bound entangled states. This revealed structure opens a novel path to find and characterize bound entanglement towards solving the long-standing problem of what the existence of bound entanglement is implying.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8492810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84928102021-10-07 Free versus bound entanglement, a NP-hard problem tackled by machine learning Hiesmayr, Beatrix C. Sci Rep Article Entanglement detection in high dimensional systems is a NP-hard problem since it is lacking an efficient way. Given a bipartite quantum state of interest free entanglement can be detected efficiently by the PPT-criterion (Peres-Horodecki criterion), in contrast to detecting bound entanglement, i.e. a curious form of entanglement that can also not be distilled into maximally (free) entangled states. Only a few bound entangled states have been found, typically by constructing dedicated entanglement witnesses, so naturally the question arises how large is the volume of those states. We define a large family of magically symmetric states of bipartite qutrits for which we find [Formula: see text] to be free entangled, [Formula: see text] to be certainly separable and as much as [Formula: see text] to be bound entangled, which shows that this kind of entanglement is not rare. Via various machine learning algorithms we can confirm that the remaining [Formula: see text] of states are more likely to belonging to the set of separable states than bound entangled states. Most important we find via dimension reduction algorithms that there is a strong two-dimensional (linear) sub-structure in the set of bound entangled states. This revealed structure opens a novel path to find and characterize bound entanglement towards solving the long-standing problem of what the existence of bound entanglement is implying. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8492810/ /pubmed/34611192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98523-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hiesmayr, Beatrix C.
Free versus bound entanglement, a NP-hard problem tackled by machine learning
title Free versus bound entanglement, a NP-hard problem tackled by machine learning
title_full Free versus bound entanglement, a NP-hard problem tackled by machine learning
title_fullStr Free versus bound entanglement, a NP-hard problem tackled by machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Free versus bound entanglement, a NP-hard problem tackled by machine learning
title_short Free versus bound entanglement, a NP-hard problem tackled by machine learning
title_sort free versus bound entanglement, a np-hard problem tackled by machine learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34611192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98523-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hiesmayrbeatrixc freeversusboundentanglementanphardproblemtackledbymachinelearning