Cargando…

Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes of One-Step and Two-Step Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revision Procedures for Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding Compared With Those After Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background: The practice of bariatric surgery was studied using the German Bariatric Surgery Registry (GBSR). The focus of the study was to evaluate whether revision surgery One-Step (OS) or Two-Step (TS) sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has a large benefit in terms of perioperative risk in patients after fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thaher, Omar, Driouch, Jamal, Hukauf, Martin, Köckerling, Ferdinand, Stroh, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34631787
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.752319
_version_ 1784579042961260544
author Thaher, Omar
Driouch, Jamal
Hukauf, Martin
Köckerling, Ferdinand
Stroh, Christine
author_facet Thaher, Omar
Driouch, Jamal
Hukauf, Martin
Köckerling, Ferdinand
Stroh, Christine
author_sort Thaher, Omar
collection PubMed
description Background: The practice of bariatric surgery was studied using the German Bariatric Surgery Registry (GBSR). The focus of the study was to evaluate whether revision surgery One-Step (OS) or Two-Step (TS) sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has a large benefit in terms of perioperative risk in patients after failed Adjustable Gastric Banding (AGB). Methods: The data collection includes patients who underwent One-Step SG (OS-SG) or Two-Step SG (TS-SG) as revision surgery after AGB and primary SG (P-SG) between 2005 and 2019. Outcome criteria were perioperative complications, comorbidities, 30-day mortality, and operating time. Results: The study analyzed data from 27,346 patients after P-SG, 320 after OS-SG, and 168 after TS-SG. Regarding the intraoperative complication, there was a significant difference in favor of P-SG and TS-SG compared to OS-SG (p < 0.001). The incidence of pulmonary complications was significantly higher in the OS-SG (p < 0.001). There was also a significant difference in occurrence of staple line stenosis in favor of TS-SG (p = 0.005) and the occurrence of sepsis (p = 0.008). The mean operating time was statistically longer in the TS-SG group than in the OS-SG group (p < 0.001). The 30-day mortality was not significantly different between the three groups (p = 0.727). Conclusion: In general, our study shows that converting a gastric band to a SG is safe and feasible. However, lower complications were obtained with TS-SG compared to OS-SG. Despite acceptable complication and mortality rates of both procedures, we cannot recommend any surgical method as a standard procedure. Proper patient selection is crucial to avoid possible adverse effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8493029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84930292021-10-07 Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes of One-Step and Two-Step Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revision Procedures for Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding Compared With Those After Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy Thaher, Omar Driouch, Jamal Hukauf, Martin Köckerling, Ferdinand Stroh, Christine Front Surg Surgery Background: The practice of bariatric surgery was studied using the German Bariatric Surgery Registry (GBSR). The focus of the study was to evaluate whether revision surgery One-Step (OS) or Two-Step (TS) sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has a large benefit in terms of perioperative risk in patients after failed Adjustable Gastric Banding (AGB). Methods: The data collection includes patients who underwent One-Step SG (OS-SG) or Two-Step SG (TS-SG) as revision surgery after AGB and primary SG (P-SG) between 2005 and 2019. Outcome criteria were perioperative complications, comorbidities, 30-day mortality, and operating time. Results: The study analyzed data from 27,346 patients after P-SG, 320 after OS-SG, and 168 after TS-SG. Regarding the intraoperative complication, there was a significant difference in favor of P-SG and TS-SG compared to OS-SG (p < 0.001). The incidence of pulmonary complications was significantly higher in the OS-SG (p < 0.001). There was also a significant difference in occurrence of staple line stenosis in favor of TS-SG (p = 0.005) and the occurrence of sepsis (p = 0.008). The mean operating time was statistically longer in the TS-SG group than in the OS-SG group (p < 0.001). The 30-day mortality was not significantly different between the three groups (p = 0.727). Conclusion: In general, our study shows that converting a gastric band to a SG is safe and feasible. However, lower complications were obtained with TS-SG compared to OS-SG. Despite acceptable complication and mortality rates of both procedures, we cannot recommend any surgical method as a standard procedure. Proper patient selection is crucial to avoid possible adverse effects. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8493029/ /pubmed/34631787 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.752319 Text en Copyright © 2021 Thaher, Driouch, Hukauf, Köckerling and Stroh. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Thaher, Omar
Driouch, Jamal
Hukauf, Martin
Köckerling, Ferdinand
Stroh, Christine
Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes of One-Step and Two-Step Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revision Procedures for Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding Compared With Those After Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy
title Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes of One-Step and Two-Step Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revision Procedures for Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding Compared With Those After Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy
title_full Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes of One-Step and Two-Step Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revision Procedures for Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding Compared With Those After Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy
title_fullStr Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes of One-Step and Two-Step Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revision Procedures for Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding Compared With Those After Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes of One-Step and Two-Step Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revision Procedures for Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding Compared With Those After Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy
title_short Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes of One-Step and Two-Step Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revision Procedures for Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding Compared With Those After Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy
title_sort feasibility and short-term outcomes of one-step and two-step sleeve gastrectomy as revision procedures for failed adjustable gastric banding compared with those after primary sleeve gastrectomy
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34631787
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.752319
work_keys_str_mv AT thaheromar feasibilityandshorttermoutcomesofonestepandtwostepsleevegastrectomyasrevisionproceduresforfailedadjustablegastricbandingcomparedwiththoseafterprimarysleevegastrectomy
AT driouchjamal feasibilityandshorttermoutcomesofonestepandtwostepsleevegastrectomyasrevisionproceduresforfailedadjustablegastricbandingcomparedwiththoseafterprimarysleevegastrectomy
AT hukaufmartin feasibilityandshorttermoutcomesofonestepandtwostepsleevegastrectomyasrevisionproceduresforfailedadjustablegastricbandingcomparedwiththoseafterprimarysleevegastrectomy
AT kockerlingferdinand feasibilityandshorttermoutcomesofonestepandtwostepsleevegastrectomyasrevisionproceduresforfailedadjustablegastricbandingcomparedwiththoseafterprimarysleevegastrectomy
AT strohchristine feasibilityandshorttermoutcomesofonestepandtwostepsleevegastrectomyasrevisionproceduresforfailedadjustablegastricbandingcomparedwiththoseafterprimarysleevegastrectomy