Cargando…
Pupil responses in patients with COVID-19
AIM: To compare pupillary responses in patients with Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) during active infection and at 3rd months post-infection. METHODS: This study included 58 COVID-19 cases (mean age 47.23 ± 1.1 years). The scotopic, mesopic and photopic diameters were noted. Pupil diameters wer...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34613562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-02053-z |
_version_ | 1784579047732281344 |
---|---|
author | Yurttaser Ocak, Serap Ozturan, Seyma Gulcenur Bas, Emine |
author_facet | Yurttaser Ocak, Serap Ozturan, Seyma Gulcenur Bas, Emine |
author_sort | Yurttaser Ocak, Serap |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To compare pupillary responses in patients with Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) during active infection and at 3rd months post-infection. METHODS: This study included 58 COVID-19 cases (mean age 47.23 ± 1.1 years). The scotopic, mesopic and photopic diameters were noted. Pupil diameters were noted at the 0, 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, and 10th seconds in reflex pupil dilation after the termination of a light. The average dilation speed was calculated at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, and 10th seconds. Pupil responses measured during COVID-19 infection and 3 months later were compared. RESULTS: The mean scotopic and mesopic pupil diameter value of during COVID-19 infection was found lower than the 3rd month post-infection. (p = 0.001, p = 0.023; respectively). No statistically significant difference was found in the mean photopic pupil diameter and the mean pupil diameter at 0 s between measurements (p > 0.05, p = 0.734; respectively). The mean pupil diameter was significantly lower during COVID-19 infection at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th and 10th seconds (p < 0.01, for each). The average dilation speed measurements at every second measured were lower in during COVID-19 infection than the 3rd months later (p = 0.001; p < 0.01 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Pupil responses were found significantly different in COVID-19 cases when compared with the measurements taken three months later. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8493048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84930482021-10-06 Pupil responses in patients with COVID-19 Yurttaser Ocak, Serap Ozturan, Seyma Gulcenur Bas, Emine Int Ophthalmol Original Paper AIM: To compare pupillary responses in patients with Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) during active infection and at 3rd months post-infection. METHODS: This study included 58 COVID-19 cases (mean age 47.23 ± 1.1 years). The scotopic, mesopic and photopic diameters were noted. Pupil diameters were noted at the 0, 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, and 10th seconds in reflex pupil dilation after the termination of a light. The average dilation speed was calculated at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, and 10th seconds. Pupil responses measured during COVID-19 infection and 3 months later were compared. RESULTS: The mean scotopic and mesopic pupil diameter value of during COVID-19 infection was found lower than the 3rd month post-infection. (p = 0.001, p = 0.023; respectively). No statistically significant difference was found in the mean photopic pupil diameter and the mean pupil diameter at 0 s between measurements (p > 0.05, p = 0.734; respectively). The mean pupil diameter was significantly lower during COVID-19 infection at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th and 10th seconds (p < 0.01, for each). The average dilation speed measurements at every second measured were lower in during COVID-19 infection than the 3rd months later (p = 0.001; p < 0.01 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Pupil responses were found significantly different in COVID-19 cases when compared with the measurements taken three months later. Springer Netherlands 2021-10-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8493048/ /pubmed/34613562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-02053-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Yurttaser Ocak, Serap Ozturan, Seyma Gulcenur Bas, Emine Pupil responses in patients with COVID-19 |
title | Pupil responses in patients with COVID-19 |
title_full | Pupil responses in patients with COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Pupil responses in patients with COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Pupil responses in patients with COVID-19 |
title_short | Pupil responses in patients with COVID-19 |
title_sort | pupil responses in patients with covid-19 |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34613562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-02053-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yurttaserocakserap pupilresponsesinpatientswithcovid19 AT ozturanseymagulcenur pupilresponsesinpatientswithcovid19 AT basemine pupilresponsesinpatientswithcovid19 |