Cargando…

Acceptability of Artificial Intelligence in Poultry Processing and Classification Efficiencies of Different Classification Models in the Categorisation of Breast Fillet Myopathies

Breast meat from modern fast-growing big birds is affected with myopathies such as woody breast (WB), white striping, and spaghetti meat (SM). The detection and separation of the myopathy-affected meat can be carried out at processing plants using technologies such as bioelectrical impedance analysi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siddique, Aftab, Shirzaei, Samira, Smith, Alice E., Valenta, Jaroslav, Garner, Laura J., Morey, Amit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34630138
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.712649
_version_ 1784579075845652480
author Siddique, Aftab
Shirzaei, Samira
Smith, Alice E.
Valenta, Jaroslav
Garner, Laura J.
Morey, Amit
author_facet Siddique, Aftab
Shirzaei, Samira
Smith, Alice E.
Valenta, Jaroslav
Garner, Laura J.
Morey, Amit
author_sort Siddique, Aftab
collection PubMed
description Breast meat from modern fast-growing big birds is affected with myopathies such as woody breast (WB), white striping, and spaghetti meat (SM). The detection and separation of the myopathy-affected meat can be carried out at processing plants using technologies such as bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). However, BIA raw data from myopathy-affected breast meat are extremely complicated, especially because of the overlap of these myopathies in individual breast fillets and the human error associated with the assignment of fillet categories. Previous research has shown that traditional statistical techniques such as ANOVA and regression, among others, are insufficient in categorising fillets affected with myopathies by BIA. Therefore, more complex data analysis tools can be used, such as support vector machines (SVMs) and backpropagation neural networks (BPNNs), to classify raw poultry breast myopathies using their BIA patterns, such that the technology can be beneficial for the poultry industry in detecting myopathies. Freshly deboned (3–3.5 h post slaughter) breast fillets (n = 100 × 3 flocks) were analysed by hand palpation for WB (0-normal; 1-mild; 2-moderate; 3-Severe) and SM (presence and absence) categorisation. BIA data (resistance and reactance) were collected on each breast fillet; the algorithm of the equipment calculated protein and fat index. The data were analysed by linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and with SVM and BPNN with 70::30: training::test data set. Compared with the LDA analysis, SVM separated WB with a higher accuracy of 71.04% for normal (data for normal and mild merged), 59.99% for moderate, and 81.48% for severe WB. Compared with SVM, the BPNN training model accurately (100%) separated normal WB fillets with and without SM, demonstrating the ability of BIA to detect SM. Supervised learning algorithms, such as SVM and BPNN, can be combined with BIA and successfully implemented in poultry processing to detect breast fillet myopathies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8493215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84932152021-10-07 Acceptability of Artificial Intelligence in Poultry Processing and Classification Efficiencies of Different Classification Models in the Categorisation of Breast Fillet Myopathies Siddique, Aftab Shirzaei, Samira Smith, Alice E. Valenta, Jaroslav Garner, Laura J. Morey, Amit Front Physiol Physiology Breast meat from modern fast-growing big birds is affected with myopathies such as woody breast (WB), white striping, and spaghetti meat (SM). The detection and separation of the myopathy-affected meat can be carried out at processing plants using technologies such as bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). However, BIA raw data from myopathy-affected breast meat are extremely complicated, especially because of the overlap of these myopathies in individual breast fillets and the human error associated with the assignment of fillet categories. Previous research has shown that traditional statistical techniques such as ANOVA and regression, among others, are insufficient in categorising fillets affected with myopathies by BIA. Therefore, more complex data analysis tools can be used, such as support vector machines (SVMs) and backpropagation neural networks (BPNNs), to classify raw poultry breast myopathies using their BIA patterns, such that the technology can be beneficial for the poultry industry in detecting myopathies. Freshly deboned (3–3.5 h post slaughter) breast fillets (n = 100 × 3 flocks) were analysed by hand palpation for WB (0-normal; 1-mild; 2-moderate; 3-Severe) and SM (presence and absence) categorisation. BIA data (resistance and reactance) were collected on each breast fillet; the algorithm of the equipment calculated protein and fat index. The data were analysed by linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and with SVM and BPNN with 70::30: training::test data set. Compared with the LDA analysis, SVM separated WB with a higher accuracy of 71.04% for normal (data for normal and mild merged), 59.99% for moderate, and 81.48% for severe WB. Compared with SVM, the BPNN training model accurately (100%) separated normal WB fillets with and without SM, demonstrating the ability of BIA to detect SM. Supervised learning algorithms, such as SVM and BPNN, can be combined with BIA and successfully implemented in poultry processing to detect breast fillet myopathies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8493215/ /pubmed/34630138 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.712649 Text en Copyright © 2021 Siddique, Shirzaei, Smith, Valenta, Garner and Morey. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Siddique, Aftab
Shirzaei, Samira
Smith, Alice E.
Valenta, Jaroslav
Garner, Laura J.
Morey, Amit
Acceptability of Artificial Intelligence in Poultry Processing and Classification Efficiencies of Different Classification Models in the Categorisation of Breast Fillet Myopathies
title Acceptability of Artificial Intelligence in Poultry Processing and Classification Efficiencies of Different Classification Models in the Categorisation of Breast Fillet Myopathies
title_full Acceptability of Artificial Intelligence in Poultry Processing and Classification Efficiencies of Different Classification Models in the Categorisation of Breast Fillet Myopathies
title_fullStr Acceptability of Artificial Intelligence in Poultry Processing and Classification Efficiencies of Different Classification Models in the Categorisation of Breast Fillet Myopathies
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability of Artificial Intelligence in Poultry Processing and Classification Efficiencies of Different Classification Models in the Categorisation of Breast Fillet Myopathies
title_short Acceptability of Artificial Intelligence in Poultry Processing and Classification Efficiencies of Different Classification Models in the Categorisation of Breast Fillet Myopathies
title_sort acceptability of artificial intelligence in poultry processing and classification efficiencies of different classification models in the categorisation of breast fillet myopathies
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34630138
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.712649
work_keys_str_mv AT siddiqueaftab acceptabilityofartificialintelligenceinpoultryprocessingandclassificationefficienciesofdifferentclassificationmodelsinthecategorisationofbreastfilletmyopathies
AT shirzaeisamira acceptabilityofartificialintelligenceinpoultryprocessingandclassificationefficienciesofdifferentclassificationmodelsinthecategorisationofbreastfilletmyopathies
AT smithalicee acceptabilityofartificialintelligenceinpoultryprocessingandclassificationefficienciesofdifferentclassificationmodelsinthecategorisationofbreastfilletmyopathies
AT valentajaroslav acceptabilityofartificialintelligenceinpoultryprocessingandclassificationefficienciesofdifferentclassificationmodelsinthecategorisationofbreastfilletmyopathies
AT garnerlauraj acceptabilityofartificialintelligenceinpoultryprocessingandclassificationefficienciesofdifferentclassificationmodelsinthecategorisationofbreastfilletmyopathies
AT moreyamit acceptabilityofartificialintelligenceinpoultryprocessingandclassificationefficienciesofdifferentclassificationmodelsinthecategorisationofbreastfilletmyopathies