Cargando…

Clinical Value of Three Combined Ultrasonography Modalities in Predicting the Risk of Metastasis to Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to assess the clinical value of conventional ultrasound (C-US), ultrasound elastography (UE), percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (P-CUES), and the combination of these three ultrasonography modalities for evaluating the risk of axillary lymph node (ALN) meta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Qing, Agyekum, Enock Adjei, Zhu, Linna, Yan, Lingling, Zhang, Lei, Wang, Xian, Yin, Liang, Qian, Xiaoqin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34631542
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.715097
_version_ 1784579089916493824
author Zhang, Qing
Agyekum, Enock Adjei
Zhu, Linna
Yan, Lingling
Zhang, Lei
Wang, Xian
Yin, Liang
Qian, Xiaoqin
author_facet Zhang, Qing
Agyekum, Enock Adjei
Zhu, Linna
Yan, Lingling
Zhang, Lei
Wang, Xian
Yin, Liang
Qian, Xiaoqin
author_sort Zhang, Qing
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to assess the clinical value of conventional ultrasound (C-US), ultrasound elastography (UE), percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (P-CUES), and the combination of these three ultrasonography modalities for evaluating the risk of axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis in breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 120 patients with pathologically confirmed IDC who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Based on the gold standard of postoperative pathology, ALN pathology results were evaluated and compared with findings obtained using C-US, UE, P-CUES, and the three modalities combined. RESULTS: (1) There was a statistically significant difference between the histological grade of the tumor and the pathological condition of ALNs. (2) The difference between C-US parameters and UE score were statistically significant. The accuracy of P-CEUS localization of SLNs was 100% (96/96) when compared with localization guided by methylene blue. The difference in the distribution of the four SLN enhancement patterns was statistically significant. (3) The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of C-US and UE were 75%, 71%, 58%, and 89%, and 71%, 72%, 50%, and 86%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of P-CUES were 91%, 82%, 78%, 92%, respectively. When all three modalities were combined, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 94%, 89%, 86%, and 95%, respectively. In the detection of ALN metastasis, there was a good correlation between histopathological results and evaluations based on the three combined ultrasonography modalities (kappa: 0.82, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When compared to C-US, UE, or P-CEUS alone, the combination of the three ultrasonography modalities was found to be superior in distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic ALNs. This combined strategy may aid physicians in determining the most appropriate approach to ALN surgery as well as the prognosis of breast IDC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8493283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84932832021-10-07 Clinical Value of Three Combined Ultrasonography Modalities in Predicting the Risk of Metastasis to Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Zhang, Qing Agyekum, Enock Adjei Zhu, Linna Yan, Lingling Zhang, Lei Wang, Xian Yin, Liang Qian, Xiaoqin Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to assess the clinical value of conventional ultrasound (C-US), ultrasound elastography (UE), percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (P-CUES), and the combination of these three ultrasonography modalities for evaluating the risk of axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis in breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 120 patients with pathologically confirmed IDC who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Based on the gold standard of postoperative pathology, ALN pathology results were evaluated and compared with findings obtained using C-US, UE, P-CUES, and the three modalities combined. RESULTS: (1) There was a statistically significant difference between the histological grade of the tumor and the pathological condition of ALNs. (2) The difference between C-US parameters and UE score were statistically significant. The accuracy of P-CEUS localization of SLNs was 100% (96/96) when compared with localization guided by methylene blue. The difference in the distribution of the four SLN enhancement patterns was statistically significant. (3) The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of C-US and UE were 75%, 71%, 58%, and 89%, and 71%, 72%, 50%, and 86%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of P-CUES were 91%, 82%, 78%, 92%, respectively. When all three modalities were combined, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 94%, 89%, 86%, and 95%, respectively. In the detection of ALN metastasis, there was a good correlation between histopathological results and evaluations based on the three combined ultrasonography modalities (kappa: 0.82, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When compared to C-US, UE, or P-CEUS alone, the combination of the three ultrasonography modalities was found to be superior in distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic ALNs. This combined strategy may aid physicians in determining the most appropriate approach to ALN surgery as well as the prognosis of breast IDC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8493283/ /pubmed/34631542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.715097 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Agyekum, Zhu, Yan, Zhang, Wang, Yin and Qian https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhang, Qing
Agyekum, Enock Adjei
Zhu, Linna
Yan, Lingling
Zhang, Lei
Wang, Xian
Yin, Liang
Qian, Xiaoqin
Clinical Value of Three Combined Ultrasonography Modalities in Predicting the Risk of Metastasis to Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
title Clinical Value of Three Combined Ultrasonography Modalities in Predicting the Risk of Metastasis to Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
title_full Clinical Value of Three Combined Ultrasonography Modalities in Predicting the Risk of Metastasis to Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
title_fullStr Clinical Value of Three Combined Ultrasonography Modalities in Predicting the Risk of Metastasis to Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Value of Three Combined Ultrasonography Modalities in Predicting the Risk of Metastasis to Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
title_short Clinical Value of Three Combined Ultrasonography Modalities in Predicting the Risk of Metastasis to Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
title_sort clinical value of three combined ultrasonography modalities in predicting the risk of metastasis to axillary lymph nodes in breast invasive ductal carcinoma
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34631542
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.715097
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangqing clinicalvalueofthreecombinedultrasonographymodalitiesinpredictingtheriskofmetastasistoaxillarylymphnodesinbreastinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT agyekumenockadjei clinicalvalueofthreecombinedultrasonographymodalitiesinpredictingtheriskofmetastasistoaxillarylymphnodesinbreastinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT zhulinna clinicalvalueofthreecombinedultrasonographymodalitiesinpredictingtheriskofmetastasistoaxillarylymphnodesinbreastinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT yanlingling clinicalvalueofthreecombinedultrasonographymodalitiesinpredictingtheriskofmetastasistoaxillarylymphnodesinbreastinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT zhanglei clinicalvalueofthreecombinedultrasonographymodalitiesinpredictingtheriskofmetastasistoaxillarylymphnodesinbreastinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT wangxian clinicalvalueofthreecombinedultrasonographymodalitiesinpredictingtheriskofmetastasistoaxillarylymphnodesinbreastinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT yinliang clinicalvalueofthreecombinedultrasonographymodalitiesinpredictingtheriskofmetastasistoaxillarylymphnodesinbreastinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT qianxiaoqin clinicalvalueofthreecombinedultrasonographymodalitiesinpredictingtheriskofmetastasistoaxillarylymphnodesinbreastinvasiveductalcarcinoma