Cargando…

Reactive Oxygen Species, Mitochondrial Membrane Potential, and Cellular Membrane Potential Are Predictors of E-Liquid Induced Cellular Toxicity

INTRODUCTION: The use of flavors in electronic cigarettes appeals to adults and never-smoking youth. Consumption has rapidly increased over the last decade, and in the U.S. market alone, there are over 8000 unique flavors. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has begun to regulate e-liquids,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Correia-Álvarez, Eva, Keating, James E, Glish, Gary, Tarran, Robert, Sassano, M Flori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33320253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa177
_version_ 1784579161838321664
author Correia-Álvarez, Eva
Keating, James E
Glish, Gary
Tarran, Robert
Sassano, M Flori
author_facet Correia-Álvarez, Eva
Keating, James E
Glish, Gary
Tarran, Robert
Sassano, M Flori
author_sort Correia-Álvarez, Eva
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The use of flavors in electronic cigarettes appeals to adults and never-smoking youth. Consumption has rapidly increased over the last decade, and in the U.S. market alone, there are over 8000 unique flavors. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has begun to regulate e-liquids, but many have not been tested, and their impact, both at the cellular level, and on human health remains unclear. METHODS: We tested e-liquids on the human cell line HEK293T and measured toxicity, mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ  (m)), reactive oxygen species production (ROS), and cellular membrane potential (V(m)) using high-throughput screening (HTS) approaches. Our HTS efforts included single-dose and 16-point dose–response curves, which allowed testing of ≥90 commercially available e-liquids in parallel to provide a rapid assessment of cellular effects as a proof of concept for a fast, preliminary toxicity method. We also investigated the chemical composition of the flavors via gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. RESULTS: We found that e-liquids caused a decrease in ΔΨ  (m) and V(m) and an increase in ROS production and toxicity in a dose-dependent fashion. In addition, the presence of five specific chemical components: vanillin, benzyl alcohol, acetoin, cinnamaldehyde, and methyl-cyclopentenolone, but not nicotine, were linked with the changes observed in the cellular traits studied. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that ΔΨ  (m), ROS, V(m), and toxicity may be indicative of the extent of cell death upon e-liquid exposure. Further research on the effect of flavors should be prioritized to help policy makers such as the FDA to regulate e-liquid composition. IMPLICATIONS: E-liquid cellular toxicity can be predicted using parameters amenable to HTS. Our data suggest that ΔΨ  (m), ROS, V(m), and toxicity may be indicative of the extent of cell death upon e-liquid exposure, and this toxicity is linked to the chemical composition, that is, flavoring components. Further research on the effect of flavors should be prioritized to help policy makers such as the FDA to regulate e-liquid composition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8493666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84936662021-10-07 Reactive Oxygen Species, Mitochondrial Membrane Potential, and Cellular Membrane Potential Are Predictors of E-Liquid Induced Cellular Toxicity Correia-Álvarez, Eva Keating, James E Glish, Gary Tarran, Robert Sassano, M Flori Nicotine Tob Res Pre-clinical Toxicity Studies of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) and Constituents INTRODUCTION: The use of flavors in electronic cigarettes appeals to adults and never-smoking youth. Consumption has rapidly increased over the last decade, and in the U.S. market alone, there are over 8000 unique flavors. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has begun to regulate e-liquids, but many have not been tested, and their impact, both at the cellular level, and on human health remains unclear. METHODS: We tested e-liquids on the human cell line HEK293T and measured toxicity, mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ  (m)), reactive oxygen species production (ROS), and cellular membrane potential (V(m)) using high-throughput screening (HTS) approaches. Our HTS efforts included single-dose and 16-point dose–response curves, which allowed testing of ≥90 commercially available e-liquids in parallel to provide a rapid assessment of cellular effects as a proof of concept for a fast, preliminary toxicity method. We also investigated the chemical composition of the flavors via gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. RESULTS: We found that e-liquids caused a decrease in ΔΨ  (m) and V(m) and an increase in ROS production and toxicity in a dose-dependent fashion. In addition, the presence of five specific chemical components: vanillin, benzyl alcohol, acetoin, cinnamaldehyde, and methyl-cyclopentenolone, but not nicotine, were linked with the changes observed in the cellular traits studied. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that ΔΨ  (m), ROS, V(m), and toxicity may be indicative of the extent of cell death upon e-liquid exposure. Further research on the effect of flavors should be prioritized to help policy makers such as the FDA to regulate e-liquid composition. IMPLICATIONS: E-liquid cellular toxicity can be predicted using parameters amenable to HTS. Our data suggest that ΔΨ  (m), ROS, V(m), and toxicity may be indicative of the extent of cell death upon e-liquid exposure, and this toxicity is linked to the chemical composition, that is, flavoring components. Further research on the effect of flavors should be prioritized to help policy makers such as the FDA to regulate e-liquid composition. Oxford University Press 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8493666/ /pubmed/33320253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa177 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Pre-clinical Toxicity Studies of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) and Constituents
Correia-Álvarez, Eva
Keating, James E
Glish, Gary
Tarran, Robert
Sassano, M Flori
Reactive Oxygen Species, Mitochondrial Membrane Potential, and Cellular Membrane Potential Are Predictors of E-Liquid Induced Cellular Toxicity
title Reactive Oxygen Species, Mitochondrial Membrane Potential, and Cellular Membrane Potential Are Predictors of E-Liquid Induced Cellular Toxicity
title_full Reactive Oxygen Species, Mitochondrial Membrane Potential, and Cellular Membrane Potential Are Predictors of E-Liquid Induced Cellular Toxicity
title_fullStr Reactive Oxygen Species, Mitochondrial Membrane Potential, and Cellular Membrane Potential Are Predictors of E-Liquid Induced Cellular Toxicity
title_full_unstemmed Reactive Oxygen Species, Mitochondrial Membrane Potential, and Cellular Membrane Potential Are Predictors of E-Liquid Induced Cellular Toxicity
title_short Reactive Oxygen Species, Mitochondrial Membrane Potential, and Cellular Membrane Potential Are Predictors of E-Liquid Induced Cellular Toxicity
title_sort reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial membrane potential, and cellular membrane potential are predictors of e-liquid induced cellular toxicity
topic Pre-clinical Toxicity Studies of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) and Constituents
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33320253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa177
work_keys_str_mv AT correiaalvarezeva reactiveoxygenspeciesmitochondrialmembranepotentialandcellularmembranepotentialarepredictorsofeliquidinducedcellulartoxicity
AT keatingjamese reactiveoxygenspeciesmitochondrialmembranepotentialandcellularmembranepotentialarepredictorsofeliquidinducedcellulartoxicity
AT glishgary reactiveoxygenspeciesmitochondrialmembranepotentialandcellularmembranepotentialarepredictorsofeliquidinducedcellulartoxicity
AT tarranrobert reactiveoxygenspeciesmitochondrialmembranepotentialandcellularmembranepotentialarepredictorsofeliquidinducedcellulartoxicity
AT sassanomflori reactiveoxygenspeciesmitochondrialmembranepotentialandcellularmembranepotentialarepredictorsofeliquidinducedcellulartoxicity