Cargando…
CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors
BACKGROUND: For optimal prosthetic anchoring in omarthritis surgery, a differentiated knowledge on the mineralisation distribution of the glenoid is important. However, database on the mineralisation of diseased joints and potential relations with glenoid angles is limited. METHODS: Shoulder specime...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34610804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04660-4 |
_version_ | 1784579169236025344 |
---|---|
author | Serrano, Nabil Kissling, Marc Krafft, Hannah Link, Karl Ullrich, Oliver Buck, Florian M. Mathews, Sandra Serowy, Steffen Gascho, Dominic Grüninger, Patrick Fornaciari, Paolo Bouaicha, Samy Müller-Gerbl, Magdalena Rühli, Frank-Jakobus Eppler, Elisabeth |
author_facet | Serrano, Nabil Kissling, Marc Krafft, Hannah Link, Karl Ullrich, Oliver Buck, Florian M. Mathews, Sandra Serowy, Steffen Gascho, Dominic Grüninger, Patrick Fornaciari, Paolo Bouaicha, Samy Müller-Gerbl, Magdalena Rühli, Frank-Jakobus Eppler, Elisabeth |
author_sort | Serrano, Nabil |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For optimal prosthetic anchoring in omarthritis surgery, a differentiated knowledge on the mineralisation distribution of the glenoid is important. However, database on the mineralisation of diseased joints and potential relations with glenoid angles is limited. METHODS: Shoulder specimens from ten female and nine male body donors with an average age of 81.5 years were investigated. Using 3D-CT-multiplanar reconstruction, glenoid inclination and retroversion angles were measured, and osteoarthritis signs graded. Computed Tomography-Osteoabsorptiometry (CT-OAM) is an established method to determine the subchondral bone plate mineralisation, which has been demonstrated to serve as marker for the long-term loading history of joints. Based on mineralisation distribution mappings of healthy shoulder specimens, physiological and different CT-OAM patterns were compared with glenoid angles. RESULTS: Osteoarthritis grades were 0-I in 52.6% of the 3D-CT-scans, grades II-III in 34.3%, and grade IV in 13.2%, with in females twice as frequently (45%) higher grades (III, IV) than in males (22%, III). The average inclination angle was 8.4°. In glenoids with inclination ≤10°, mineralisation was predominantly centrally distributed and tended to shift more cranially when the inclination raised to > 10°. The average retroversion angle was − 5.2°. A dorsally enhanced mineralisation distribution was found in glenoids with versions from − 15.9° to + 1.7°. A predominantly centrally distributed mineralisation was accompanied by a narrower range of retroversion angles between − 10° to − 0.4°. CONCLUSIONS: This study is one of the first to combine CT-based analyses of glenoid angles and mineralisation distribution in an elderly population. The data set is limited to 19 individuals, however, indicates that superior inclination between 0° and 10°-15°, and dorsal version ranging between − 9° to − 3° may be predominantly associated with anterior and central mineralisation patterns previously classified as physiological for the shoulder joint. The current basic research findings may serve as basic data set for future studies addressing the glenoid geometry for treatment planning in omarthritis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04660-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8493698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84936982021-10-06 CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors Serrano, Nabil Kissling, Marc Krafft, Hannah Link, Karl Ullrich, Oliver Buck, Florian M. Mathews, Sandra Serowy, Steffen Gascho, Dominic Grüninger, Patrick Fornaciari, Paolo Bouaicha, Samy Müller-Gerbl, Magdalena Rühli, Frank-Jakobus Eppler, Elisabeth BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: For optimal prosthetic anchoring in omarthritis surgery, a differentiated knowledge on the mineralisation distribution of the glenoid is important. However, database on the mineralisation of diseased joints and potential relations with glenoid angles is limited. METHODS: Shoulder specimens from ten female and nine male body donors with an average age of 81.5 years were investigated. Using 3D-CT-multiplanar reconstruction, glenoid inclination and retroversion angles were measured, and osteoarthritis signs graded. Computed Tomography-Osteoabsorptiometry (CT-OAM) is an established method to determine the subchondral bone plate mineralisation, which has been demonstrated to serve as marker for the long-term loading history of joints. Based on mineralisation distribution mappings of healthy shoulder specimens, physiological and different CT-OAM patterns were compared with glenoid angles. RESULTS: Osteoarthritis grades were 0-I in 52.6% of the 3D-CT-scans, grades II-III in 34.3%, and grade IV in 13.2%, with in females twice as frequently (45%) higher grades (III, IV) than in males (22%, III). The average inclination angle was 8.4°. In glenoids with inclination ≤10°, mineralisation was predominantly centrally distributed and tended to shift more cranially when the inclination raised to > 10°. The average retroversion angle was − 5.2°. A dorsally enhanced mineralisation distribution was found in glenoids with versions from − 15.9° to + 1.7°. A predominantly centrally distributed mineralisation was accompanied by a narrower range of retroversion angles between − 10° to − 0.4°. CONCLUSIONS: This study is one of the first to combine CT-based analyses of glenoid angles and mineralisation distribution in an elderly population. The data set is limited to 19 individuals, however, indicates that superior inclination between 0° and 10°-15°, and dorsal version ranging between − 9° to − 3° may be predominantly associated with anterior and central mineralisation patterns previously classified as physiological for the shoulder joint. The current basic research findings may serve as basic data set for future studies addressing the glenoid geometry for treatment planning in omarthritis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04660-4. BioMed Central 2021-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8493698/ /pubmed/34610804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04660-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Serrano, Nabil Kissling, Marc Krafft, Hannah Link, Karl Ullrich, Oliver Buck, Florian M. Mathews, Sandra Serowy, Steffen Gascho, Dominic Grüninger, Patrick Fornaciari, Paolo Bouaicha, Samy Müller-Gerbl, Magdalena Rühli, Frank-Jakobus Eppler, Elisabeth CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors |
title | CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors |
title_full | CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors |
title_fullStr | CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors |
title_full_unstemmed | CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors |
title_short | CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors |
title_sort | ct-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34610804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04660-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT serranonabil ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors AT kisslingmarc ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors AT kraffthannah ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors AT linkkarl ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors AT ullricholiver ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors AT buckflorianm ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors AT mathewssandra ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors AT serowysteffen ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors AT gaschodominic ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors AT gruningerpatrick ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors AT fornaciaripaolo ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors AT bouaichasamy ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors AT mullergerblmagdalena ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors AT ruhlifrankjakobus ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors AT epplerelisabeth ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors |