Cargando…

CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors

BACKGROUND: For optimal prosthetic anchoring in omarthritis surgery, a differentiated knowledge on the mineralisation distribution of the glenoid is important. However, database on the mineralisation of diseased joints and potential relations with glenoid angles is limited. METHODS: Shoulder specime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serrano, Nabil, Kissling, Marc, Krafft, Hannah, Link, Karl, Ullrich, Oliver, Buck, Florian M., Mathews, Sandra, Serowy, Steffen, Gascho, Dominic, Grüninger, Patrick, Fornaciari, Paolo, Bouaicha, Samy, Müller-Gerbl, Magdalena, Rühli, Frank-Jakobus, Eppler, Elisabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34610804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04660-4
_version_ 1784579169236025344
author Serrano, Nabil
Kissling, Marc
Krafft, Hannah
Link, Karl
Ullrich, Oliver
Buck, Florian M.
Mathews, Sandra
Serowy, Steffen
Gascho, Dominic
Grüninger, Patrick
Fornaciari, Paolo
Bouaicha, Samy
Müller-Gerbl, Magdalena
Rühli, Frank-Jakobus
Eppler, Elisabeth
author_facet Serrano, Nabil
Kissling, Marc
Krafft, Hannah
Link, Karl
Ullrich, Oliver
Buck, Florian M.
Mathews, Sandra
Serowy, Steffen
Gascho, Dominic
Grüninger, Patrick
Fornaciari, Paolo
Bouaicha, Samy
Müller-Gerbl, Magdalena
Rühli, Frank-Jakobus
Eppler, Elisabeth
author_sort Serrano, Nabil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For optimal prosthetic anchoring in omarthritis surgery, a differentiated knowledge on the mineralisation distribution of the glenoid is important. However, database on the mineralisation of diseased joints and potential relations with glenoid angles is limited. METHODS: Shoulder specimens from ten female and nine male body donors with an average age of 81.5 years were investigated. Using 3D-CT-multiplanar reconstruction, glenoid inclination and retroversion angles were measured, and osteoarthritis signs graded. Computed Tomography-Osteoabsorptiometry (CT-OAM) is an established method to determine the subchondral bone plate mineralisation, which has been demonstrated to serve as marker for the long-term loading history of joints. Based on mineralisation distribution mappings of healthy shoulder specimens, physiological and different CT-OAM patterns were compared with glenoid angles. RESULTS: Osteoarthritis grades were 0-I in 52.6% of the 3D-CT-scans, grades II-III in 34.3%, and grade IV in 13.2%, with in females twice as frequently (45%) higher grades (III, IV) than in males (22%, III). The average inclination angle was 8.4°. In glenoids with inclination ≤10°, mineralisation was predominantly centrally distributed and tended to shift more cranially when the inclination raised to > 10°. The average retroversion angle was − 5.2°. A dorsally enhanced mineralisation distribution was found in glenoids with versions from − 15.9° to + 1.7°. A predominantly centrally distributed mineralisation was accompanied by a narrower range of retroversion angles between − 10° to − 0.4°. CONCLUSIONS: This study is one of the first to combine CT-based analyses of glenoid angles and mineralisation distribution in an elderly population. The data set is limited to 19 individuals, however, indicates that superior inclination between 0° and 10°-15°, and dorsal version ranging between − 9° to − 3° may be predominantly associated with anterior and central mineralisation patterns previously classified as physiological for the shoulder joint. The current basic research findings may serve as basic data set for future studies addressing the glenoid geometry for treatment planning in omarthritis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04660-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8493698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84936982021-10-06 CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors Serrano, Nabil Kissling, Marc Krafft, Hannah Link, Karl Ullrich, Oliver Buck, Florian M. Mathews, Sandra Serowy, Steffen Gascho, Dominic Grüninger, Patrick Fornaciari, Paolo Bouaicha, Samy Müller-Gerbl, Magdalena Rühli, Frank-Jakobus Eppler, Elisabeth BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: For optimal prosthetic anchoring in omarthritis surgery, a differentiated knowledge on the mineralisation distribution of the glenoid is important. However, database on the mineralisation of diseased joints and potential relations with glenoid angles is limited. METHODS: Shoulder specimens from ten female and nine male body donors with an average age of 81.5 years were investigated. Using 3D-CT-multiplanar reconstruction, glenoid inclination and retroversion angles were measured, and osteoarthritis signs graded. Computed Tomography-Osteoabsorptiometry (CT-OAM) is an established method to determine the subchondral bone plate mineralisation, which has been demonstrated to serve as marker for the long-term loading history of joints. Based on mineralisation distribution mappings of healthy shoulder specimens, physiological and different CT-OAM patterns were compared with glenoid angles. RESULTS: Osteoarthritis grades were 0-I in 52.6% of the 3D-CT-scans, grades II-III in 34.3%, and grade IV in 13.2%, with in females twice as frequently (45%) higher grades (III, IV) than in males (22%, III). The average inclination angle was 8.4°. In glenoids with inclination ≤10°, mineralisation was predominantly centrally distributed and tended to shift more cranially when the inclination raised to > 10°. The average retroversion angle was − 5.2°. A dorsally enhanced mineralisation distribution was found in glenoids with versions from − 15.9° to + 1.7°. A predominantly centrally distributed mineralisation was accompanied by a narrower range of retroversion angles between − 10° to − 0.4°. CONCLUSIONS: This study is one of the first to combine CT-based analyses of glenoid angles and mineralisation distribution in an elderly population. The data set is limited to 19 individuals, however, indicates that superior inclination between 0° and 10°-15°, and dorsal version ranging between − 9° to − 3° may be predominantly associated with anterior and central mineralisation patterns previously classified as physiological for the shoulder joint. The current basic research findings may serve as basic data set for future studies addressing the glenoid geometry for treatment planning in omarthritis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04660-4. BioMed Central 2021-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8493698/ /pubmed/34610804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04660-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Serrano, Nabil
Kissling, Marc
Krafft, Hannah
Link, Karl
Ullrich, Oliver
Buck, Florian M.
Mathews, Sandra
Serowy, Steffen
Gascho, Dominic
Grüninger, Patrick
Fornaciari, Paolo
Bouaicha, Samy
Müller-Gerbl, Magdalena
Rühli, Frank-Jakobus
Eppler, Elisabeth
CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors
title CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors
title_full CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors
title_fullStr CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors
title_full_unstemmed CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors
title_short CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors
title_sort ct-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34610804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04660-4
work_keys_str_mv AT serranonabil ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors
AT kisslingmarc ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors
AT kraffthannah ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors
AT linkkarl ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors
AT ullricholiver ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors
AT buckflorianm ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors
AT mathewssandra ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors
AT serowysteffen ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors
AT gaschodominic ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors
AT gruningerpatrick ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors
AT fornaciaripaolo ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors
AT bouaichasamy ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors
AT mullergerblmagdalena ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors
AT ruhlifrankjakobus ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors
AT epplerelisabeth ctbasedandmorphologicalcomparisonofglenoidinclinationandversionanglesandmineralisationdistributioninhumanbodydonors