Cargando…
Volatile anesthetics maintain tidal volume and minute ventilation to a greater degree than propofol under spontaneous respiration
BACKGROUND: Although general anesthetics depress spontaneous respiration, the comprehensive effect of general anesthetics on respiratory function remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the effects of general anesthetics on spontaneous respiration in non-intubated mice with different types and dose...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34615483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01438-y |
_version_ | 1784579173815156736 |
---|---|
author | Hao, Xuechao Ou, Mengchan Li, Yu Zhou, Cheng |
author_facet | Hao, Xuechao Ou, Mengchan Li, Yu Zhou, Cheng |
author_sort | Hao, Xuechao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although general anesthetics depress spontaneous respiration, the comprehensive effect of general anesthetics on respiratory function remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the effects of general anesthetics on spontaneous respiration in non-intubated mice with different types and doses of general anesthetic. METHODS: Adult C57BL/6 J mice were administered intravenous anesthetics, including propofol and etomidate, and inhalational anesthetics, including sevoflurane and isoflurane in vivo at doses of 0.5-, 1.0-, and 2.0-times the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC)/median effective dose (ED(50)) to induce loss of the righting reflex (LORR). Whole-body plethysmography (WBP) was applied to measure parameters of respiration under unrestricted conditions without endotracheal intubation. The alteration in respiratory sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO(2)) under general anesthesia was also determined. The following respiratory parameters were continuously recorded during anesthesia or CO(2) exposure: respiratory frequency (FR), tidal volume (TV), minute ventilation (MV), expiratory time (TE), inspiratory time (TI), and inspiratory–expiratory time ratio (I/E), and peak inspiratory flow. RESULTS: Sub-anesthetic concentrations (0.5 MAC) of sevoflurane or isoflurane increased FR, TV, and MV. With isoflurane and sevoflurane exposure, the CO(2)-evoked increases in FR, TV, and MV were decreased. Compared with inhalational anesthetics, propofol and etomidate induced respiratory suppression, affecting FR, TV, and MV. In 100% oxygen (O(2)), FR in the group that received propofol 1.0-times the ED(50) was 69.63 ± 33.44 breaths/min compared with 155.68 ± 64.42 breaths/min in the etomidate-treated group. In the same groups, FR was 88.72 ± 34.51 breaths/min and 225.10 ± 59.82 breaths/min, respectively, in 3% CO(2) and 144.17 ± 63.25 breaths/min and 197.70 ± 41.93 breaths/min, respectively, in 5% CO(2). A higher CO(2) sensitivity was found in etomidate-treated mice compared with propofol-treated mice. In addition, propofol induced a greater decrease in FR, MV, and I/E ratio compared with etomidate, sevoflurane, and isoflurane at equivalent doses (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: General anesthetics differentially modulate spontaneous breathing in vivo. Volatile anesthetics increase FR, TV, and MV at sub-anesthetic concentrations, while they decrease FR at higher concentrations. Propofol consistently depressed respiratory parameters to a greater degree than etomidate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8493718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84937182021-10-06 Volatile anesthetics maintain tidal volume and minute ventilation to a greater degree than propofol under spontaneous respiration Hao, Xuechao Ou, Mengchan Li, Yu Zhou, Cheng BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Although general anesthetics depress spontaneous respiration, the comprehensive effect of general anesthetics on respiratory function remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the effects of general anesthetics on spontaneous respiration in non-intubated mice with different types and doses of general anesthetic. METHODS: Adult C57BL/6 J mice were administered intravenous anesthetics, including propofol and etomidate, and inhalational anesthetics, including sevoflurane and isoflurane in vivo at doses of 0.5-, 1.0-, and 2.0-times the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC)/median effective dose (ED(50)) to induce loss of the righting reflex (LORR). Whole-body plethysmography (WBP) was applied to measure parameters of respiration under unrestricted conditions without endotracheal intubation. The alteration in respiratory sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO(2)) under general anesthesia was also determined. The following respiratory parameters were continuously recorded during anesthesia or CO(2) exposure: respiratory frequency (FR), tidal volume (TV), minute ventilation (MV), expiratory time (TE), inspiratory time (TI), and inspiratory–expiratory time ratio (I/E), and peak inspiratory flow. RESULTS: Sub-anesthetic concentrations (0.5 MAC) of sevoflurane or isoflurane increased FR, TV, and MV. With isoflurane and sevoflurane exposure, the CO(2)-evoked increases in FR, TV, and MV were decreased. Compared with inhalational anesthetics, propofol and etomidate induced respiratory suppression, affecting FR, TV, and MV. In 100% oxygen (O(2)), FR in the group that received propofol 1.0-times the ED(50) was 69.63 ± 33.44 breaths/min compared with 155.68 ± 64.42 breaths/min in the etomidate-treated group. In the same groups, FR was 88.72 ± 34.51 breaths/min and 225.10 ± 59.82 breaths/min, respectively, in 3% CO(2) and 144.17 ± 63.25 breaths/min and 197.70 ± 41.93 breaths/min, respectively, in 5% CO(2). A higher CO(2) sensitivity was found in etomidate-treated mice compared with propofol-treated mice. In addition, propofol induced a greater decrease in FR, MV, and I/E ratio compared with etomidate, sevoflurane, and isoflurane at equivalent doses (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: General anesthetics differentially modulate spontaneous breathing in vivo. Volatile anesthetics increase FR, TV, and MV at sub-anesthetic concentrations, while they decrease FR at higher concentrations. Propofol consistently depressed respiratory parameters to a greater degree than etomidate. BioMed Central 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8493718/ /pubmed/34615483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01438-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Hao, Xuechao Ou, Mengchan Li, Yu Zhou, Cheng Volatile anesthetics maintain tidal volume and minute ventilation to a greater degree than propofol under spontaneous respiration |
title | Volatile anesthetics maintain tidal volume and minute ventilation to a greater degree than propofol under spontaneous respiration |
title_full | Volatile anesthetics maintain tidal volume and minute ventilation to a greater degree than propofol under spontaneous respiration |
title_fullStr | Volatile anesthetics maintain tidal volume and minute ventilation to a greater degree than propofol under spontaneous respiration |
title_full_unstemmed | Volatile anesthetics maintain tidal volume and minute ventilation to a greater degree than propofol under spontaneous respiration |
title_short | Volatile anesthetics maintain tidal volume and minute ventilation to a greater degree than propofol under spontaneous respiration |
title_sort | volatile anesthetics maintain tidal volume and minute ventilation to a greater degree than propofol under spontaneous respiration |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34615483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01438-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haoxuechao volatileanestheticsmaintaintidalvolumeandminuteventilationtoagreaterdegreethanpropofolunderspontaneousrespiration AT oumengchan volatileanestheticsmaintaintidalvolumeandminuteventilationtoagreaterdegreethanpropofolunderspontaneousrespiration AT liyu volatileanestheticsmaintaintidalvolumeandminuteventilationtoagreaterdegreethanpropofolunderspontaneousrespiration AT zhoucheng volatileanestheticsmaintaintidalvolumeandminuteventilationtoagreaterdegreethanpropofolunderspontaneousrespiration |