Cargando…

Family support on intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative evaluation study into experiences of relatives

BACKGROUND: During the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, relatives of patients with COVID-19 admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICUs) were severely restricted in visiting their relatives and in communicating with treating physicians. Family communication is a core element of cri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klop, Hanna T., Nasori, Mana, Klinge, Tjitske W., Hoopman, Rianne, de Vos, Mirjam A., du Perron, Chantal, van Zuylen, Lia, Steegers, Monique, ten Tusscher, Birkitt L., Abbink, Floor C. H., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D., Pasman, H. Roeline W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8494165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34615524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07095-8
_version_ 1784579253980889088
author Klop, Hanna T.
Nasori, Mana
Klinge, Tjitske W.
Hoopman, Rianne
de Vos, Mirjam A.
du Perron, Chantal
van Zuylen, Lia
Steegers, Monique
ten Tusscher, Birkitt L.
Abbink, Floor C. H.
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D.
Pasman, H. Roeline W.
author_facet Klop, Hanna T.
Nasori, Mana
Klinge, Tjitske W.
Hoopman, Rianne
de Vos, Mirjam A.
du Perron, Chantal
van Zuylen, Lia
Steegers, Monique
ten Tusscher, Birkitt L.
Abbink, Floor C. H.
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D.
Pasman, H. Roeline W.
author_sort Klop, Hanna T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, relatives of patients with COVID-19 admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICUs) were severely restricted in visiting their relatives and in communicating with treating physicians. Family communication is a core element of critical care, however, this pandemic forced medical ICU staff to arrange alternative family support for instance by Family Support Teams (FSTs), consisting of non-ICU affiliated staff who telephonically contacted relatives. This study aims to examine relatives’ experiences with FSTs on two ICUs of a Dutch university medical centre, and to evaluate its working strategies. . METHODS: In a semi-structured interview study, relatives of patients with COVID-19 admitted to ICU’s, who had been supported by the FSTs, were sampled purposively. Twenty-one interviews were conducted telephonically by three researchers. All interviews were topic list guided and audio-recorded. Data was analysed thematically. RESULTS: All participants indicated they went through a rough time. Almost all evaluated the FSTs positively. Four major themes were identified. First, three important pillars of the FSTs were providing relatives with transparency about the patients’ situation, providing attention to relatives’ well-being, and providing predictability and certainty by calling on a daily basis in a period characterised by insecurity. Second, relatives appeared to fulfil their information needs by calls of the FSTs, but also by calling the attending ICU nurse. Information provided by the FSTs was associated with details and reliability, information provided by nurses was associated with the patient’s daily care. Third, being a primary family contact was generally experienced as both valuable and as an emotional burden. Last, participants missed proper aftercare. Family support often stopped directly after the patient died or had left the ICU. Relatives expressed a need for extended support after that moment since they had strong emotions after discharge or death of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Family support in times of the extreme COVID-19 situation is important, as relatives are restricted in communication and have a strong need for information and support. Relatives feel encouraged by structure, frequency, support and understanding by FSTs. However, remote family support should be tailored to the needs of relatives. A fixed contact person on de ICU and video calling might be good extra options for family support, also in future post COVID-19 care, but cannot replace physical visits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8494165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84941652021-10-07 Family support on intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative evaluation study into experiences of relatives Klop, Hanna T. Nasori, Mana Klinge, Tjitske W. Hoopman, Rianne de Vos, Mirjam A. du Perron, Chantal van Zuylen, Lia Steegers, Monique ten Tusscher, Birkitt L. Abbink, Floor C. H. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D. Pasman, H. Roeline W. BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: During the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, relatives of patients with COVID-19 admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICUs) were severely restricted in visiting their relatives and in communicating with treating physicians. Family communication is a core element of critical care, however, this pandemic forced medical ICU staff to arrange alternative family support for instance by Family Support Teams (FSTs), consisting of non-ICU affiliated staff who telephonically contacted relatives. This study aims to examine relatives’ experiences with FSTs on two ICUs of a Dutch university medical centre, and to evaluate its working strategies. . METHODS: In a semi-structured interview study, relatives of patients with COVID-19 admitted to ICU’s, who had been supported by the FSTs, were sampled purposively. Twenty-one interviews were conducted telephonically by three researchers. All interviews were topic list guided and audio-recorded. Data was analysed thematically. RESULTS: All participants indicated they went through a rough time. Almost all evaluated the FSTs positively. Four major themes were identified. First, three important pillars of the FSTs were providing relatives with transparency about the patients’ situation, providing attention to relatives’ well-being, and providing predictability and certainty by calling on a daily basis in a period characterised by insecurity. Second, relatives appeared to fulfil their information needs by calls of the FSTs, but also by calling the attending ICU nurse. Information provided by the FSTs was associated with details and reliability, information provided by nurses was associated with the patient’s daily care. Third, being a primary family contact was generally experienced as both valuable and as an emotional burden. Last, participants missed proper aftercare. Family support often stopped directly after the patient died or had left the ICU. Relatives expressed a need for extended support after that moment since they had strong emotions after discharge or death of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Family support in times of the extreme COVID-19 situation is important, as relatives are restricted in communication and have a strong need for information and support. Relatives feel encouraged by structure, frequency, support and understanding by FSTs. However, remote family support should be tailored to the needs of relatives. A fixed contact person on de ICU and video calling might be good extra options for family support, also in future post COVID-19 care, but cannot replace physical visits. BioMed Central 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8494165/ /pubmed/34615524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07095-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Klop, Hanna T.
Nasori, Mana
Klinge, Tjitske W.
Hoopman, Rianne
de Vos, Mirjam A.
du Perron, Chantal
van Zuylen, Lia
Steegers, Monique
ten Tusscher, Birkitt L.
Abbink, Floor C. H.
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D.
Pasman, H. Roeline W.
Family support on intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative evaluation study into experiences of relatives
title Family support on intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative evaluation study into experiences of relatives
title_full Family support on intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative evaluation study into experiences of relatives
title_fullStr Family support on intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative evaluation study into experiences of relatives
title_full_unstemmed Family support on intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative evaluation study into experiences of relatives
title_short Family support on intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative evaluation study into experiences of relatives
title_sort family support on intensive care units during the covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative evaluation study into experiences of relatives
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8494165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34615524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07095-8
work_keys_str_mv AT klophannat familysupportonintensivecareunitsduringthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeevaluationstudyintoexperiencesofrelatives
AT nasorimana familysupportonintensivecareunitsduringthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeevaluationstudyintoexperiencesofrelatives
AT klingetjitskew familysupportonintensivecareunitsduringthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeevaluationstudyintoexperiencesofrelatives
AT hoopmanrianne familysupportonintensivecareunitsduringthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeevaluationstudyintoexperiencesofrelatives
AT devosmirjama familysupportonintensivecareunitsduringthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeevaluationstudyintoexperiencesofrelatives
AT duperronchantal familysupportonintensivecareunitsduringthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeevaluationstudyintoexperiencesofrelatives
AT vanzuylenlia familysupportonintensivecareunitsduringthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeevaluationstudyintoexperiencesofrelatives
AT steegersmonique familysupportonintensivecareunitsduringthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeevaluationstudyintoexperiencesofrelatives
AT tentusscherbirkittl familysupportonintensivecareunitsduringthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeevaluationstudyintoexperiencesofrelatives
AT abbinkfloorch familysupportonintensivecareunitsduringthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeevaluationstudyintoexperiencesofrelatives
AT onwuteakaphilipsenbregjed familysupportonintensivecareunitsduringthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeevaluationstudyintoexperiencesofrelatives
AT pasmanhroelinew familysupportonintensivecareunitsduringthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeevaluationstudyintoexperiencesofrelatives