Cargando…

Optimization of injection dose in (18)F-FDG PET/CT based on the 2020 national diagnostic reference levels for nuclear medicine in Japan

OBJECTIVE: Recently, the national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in Japan were revised as the DRLs 2020, wherein the body weight-based injection dose optimization in positron emission tomography/computed tomography using (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) was first proposed. We re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sagara, Hiroaki, Inoue, Kazumasa, Yaku, Hideki, Ohsawa, Amon, Someya, Takashi, Yanagisawa, Kaori, Ohashi, Shuhei, Ishigaki, Rikuta, Wakabayashi, Masashi, Muramatsu, Yoshihisa, Fujii, Hirofumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8494693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34287782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01656-x
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Recently, the national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in Japan were revised as the DRLs 2020, wherein the body weight-based injection dose optimization in positron emission tomography/computed tomography using (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) was first proposed. We retrospectively investigated the usefulness of this optimization method in improving image quality and reducing radiation dose. METHODS: A total of 1,231 patients were enrolled in this study. A fixed injection dose of 240 MBq was administered to 624 patients, and a dose adjusted to 3.7 MBq/kg body weight was given to 607 patients. The patients with body weight-based injection doses were further divided according to body weight: group 1 (≤ 49 kg), group 2 (50–59 kg), group 3 (60–69 kg), and group 4 (≥ 70 kg). The effective radiation dose of FDG PET was calculated using the conversion factor of 0.019 mSv/MBq, per the International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 106. Image quality was assessed using noise equivalent count density (NEC(density)), which was calculated by excluding the counts of the brain and bladder. The usefulness of the injection dose optimization in terms of radiation dose and image quality was analyzed. RESULTS: The body weight-based injection dose optimization significantly decreased the effective dose by 11%, from 4.54 ± 0.1 mSv to 4.05 ± 0.8 mSv (p < 0.001). Image quality evaluated by NEC(density) was also significantly improved by 10%, from 0.39 ± 0.1 to 0.43 ± 0.2 (p < 0.001). In no case did NEC(density) deteriorate when the effective dose was decreased. In group 1, the dose decreased by 32%, while there was no significant deterioration in NEC(density) (p = 0.054). In group 2, the dose decreased by 17%, and the NEC(density) increased significantly (p < 0.01). In group 3, the dose decreased by 3%, and the NEC(density) increased significantly (p < 0.01). In group 4, the dose increased by 14%, but there was no significant change in the NEC(density) (p = 0.766). CONCLUSION: Body weight-based FDG injection dose optimization contributed to not only the reduction of effective dose but also the improvement of image quality in patients weighing between 50 and 69 kg.