Cargando…

Predicting the need of aortic valve surgery in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography

To compare the ability of cardiac magnetic resonance tomography (CMR) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to predict the need for valve surgery in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation on a mid-term basis. 66 individuals underwent assessment of aortic regurgitation (AR) both in CMR and TTE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faber, M., Sonne, C., Rosner, S., Persch, H., Reinhard, W., Hendrich, E., Will, A., Martinoff, S., Hadamitzky, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8494718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34008075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02255-7
_version_ 1784579375709028352
author Faber, M.
Sonne, C.
Rosner, S.
Persch, H.
Reinhard, W.
Hendrich, E.
Will, A.
Martinoff, S.
Hadamitzky, M.
author_facet Faber, M.
Sonne, C.
Rosner, S.
Persch, H.
Reinhard, W.
Hendrich, E.
Will, A.
Martinoff, S.
Hadamitzky, M.
author_sort Faber, M.
collection PubMed
description To compare the ability of cardiac magnetic resonance tomography (CMR) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to predict the need for valve surgery in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation on a mid-term basis. 66 individuals underwent assessment of aortic regurgitation (AR) both in CMR and TTE between August 2012 and April 2017. The follow-up rate was 76% with a median of 5.1 years. Cox proportional hazards method was used to assess the association of the time-to-aortic-valve-surgery, including valve replacement and reconstruction, and imaging parameters. A direct comparison of most predictive CMR and echocardiographic parameters was performed by using nested-factor-models. Sixteen patients (32%) were treated with aortic valve surgery during follow-up. Aortic valve insufficiency parameters, both of echocardiography and CMR, showed good discriminative and predictive power regarding the need of valve surgery. Within all examined parameters AR gradation derived by CMR correlated best with outcome [χ(2) = 27.1; HR 12.2 (95% CI: 4.56, 36.8); (p < 0.0001)]. In direct comparison of both modalities, CMR assessment provided additive prognostic power beyond echocardiographic assessment of AR but not vice versa (improvement of χ(2) from 21.4 to 28.4; p = 0.008). Nested model analysis demonstrated an overall better correlation with outcome by using both modalities compared with using echo alone with the best improvement in the moderate to severe AR range with an echo grade II out of III and a regurgitation fraction of 32% in CMR. This study corroborates the capability of CMR in direct quantification of AR and its role for guiding further treatment decisions particularly in patients with moderate AR in echocardiography. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-021-02255-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8494718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84947182021-10-19 Predicting the need of aortic valve surgery in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography Faber, M. Sonne, C. Rosner, S. Persch, H. Reinhard, W. Hendrich, E. Will, A. Martinoff, S. Hadamitzky, M. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper To compare the ability of cardiac magnetic resonance tomography (CMR) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to predict the need for valve surgery in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation on a mid-term basis. 66 individuals underwent assessment of aortic regurgitation (AR) both in CMR and TTE between August 2012 and April 2017. The follow-up rate was 76% with a median of 5.1 years. Cox proportional hazards method was used to assess the association of the time-to-aortic-valve-surgery, including valve replacement and reconstruction, and imaging parameters. A direct comparison of most predictive CMR and echocardiographic parameters was performed by using nested-factor-models. Sixteen patients (32%) were treated with aortic valve surgery during follow-up. Aortic valve insufficiency parameters, both of echocardiography and CMR, showed good discriminative and predictive power regarding the need of valve surgery. Within all examined parameters AR gradation derived by CMR correlated best with outcome [χ(2) = 27.1; HR 12.2 (95% CI: 4.56, 36.8); (p < 0.0001)]. In direct comparison of both modalities, CMR assessment provided additive prognostic power beyond echocardiographic assessment of AR but not vice versa (improvement of χ(2) from 21.4 to 28.4; p = 0.008). Nested model analysis demonstrated an overall better correlation with outcome by using both modalities compared with using echo alone with the best improvement in the moderate to severe AR range with an echo grade II out of III and a regurgitation fraction of 32% in CMR. This study corroborates the capability of CMR in direct quantification of AR and its role for guiding further treatment decisions particularly in patients with moderate AR in echocardiography. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-021-02255-7. Springer Netherlands 2021-05-18 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8494718/ /pubmed/34008075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02255-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Faber, M.
Sonne, C.
Rosner, S.
Persch, H.
Reinhard, W.
Hendrich, E.
Will, A.
Martinoff, S.
Hadamitzky, M.
Predicting the need of aortic valve surgery in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography
title Predicting the need of aortic valve surgery in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography
title_full Predicting the need of aortic valve surgery in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography
title_fullStr Predicting the need of aortic valve surgery in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed Predicting the need of aortic valve surgery in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography
title_short Predicting the need of aortic valve surgery in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography
title_sort predicting the need of aortic valve surgery in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8494718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34008075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02255-7
work_keys_str_mv AT faberm predictingtheneedofaorticvalvesurgeryinpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationacomparisonbetweencardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingandtransthoracicechocardiography
AT sonnec predictingtheneedofaorticvalvesurgeryinpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationacomparisonbetweencardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingandtransthoracicechocardiography
AT rosners predictingtheneedofaorticvalvesurgeryinpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationacomparisonbetweencardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingandtransthoracicechocardiography
AT perschh predictingtheneedofaorticvalvesurgeryinpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationacomparisonbetweencardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingandtransthoracicechocardiography
AT reinhardw predictingtheneedofaorticvalvesurgeryinpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationacomparisonbetweencardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingandtransthoracicechocardiography
AT hendriche predictingtheneedofaorticvalvesurgeryinpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationacomparisonbetweencardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingandtransthoracicechocardiography
AT willa predictingtheneedofaorticvalvesurgeryinpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationacomparisonbetweencardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingandtransthoracicechocardiography
AT martinoffs predictingtheneedofaorticvalvesurgeryinpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationacomparisonbetweencardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingandtransthoracicechocardiography
AT hadamitzkym predictingtheneedofaorticvalvesurgeryinpatientswithchronicaorticregurgitationacomparisonbetweencardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingandtransthoracicechocardiography