Cargando…

Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction: Sex Differences in the ECG

Background: The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a key tool in patient management. Automated ECG analysis supports clinical decision-making, but traditional fiducial point identification discards much of the time-series data that captures the morphology of the whole waveform. Our Symmetric Projection Attr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lyle, Jane V., Nandi, Manasi, Aston, Philip J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8495026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34631814
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.709457
_version_ 1784579445571452928
author Lyle, Jane V.
Nandi, Manasi
Aston, Philip J.
author_facet Lyle, Jane V.
Nandi, Manasi
Aston, Philip J.
author_sort Lyle, Jane V.
collection PubMed
description Background: The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a key tool in patient management. Automated ECG analysis supports clinical decision-making, but traditional fiducial point identification discards much of the time-series data that captures the morphology of the whole waveform. Our Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction (SPAR) method uses all the available data to provide a new visualization and quantification of the morphology and variability of any approximately periodic signal. We therefore applied SPAR to ECG signals to ascertain whether this more detailed investigation of ECG morphology adds clinical value. Methods: Our aim was to demonstrate the accuracy of the SPAR method in discriminating between two biologically distinct groups. As sex has been shown to influence the waveform appearance, we investigated sex differences in normal sinus rhythm ECGs. We applied the SPAR method to 9,007 10 second 12-lead ECG recordings from Physionet, which comprised; Dataset 1: 104 subjects (40% female), Dataset 2: 8,903 subjects (54% female). Results: SPAR showed clear visual differences between female and male ECGs (Dataset 1). A stacked machine learning model achieved a cross-validation sex classification accuracy of 86.3% (Dataset 2) and an unseen test accuracy of 91.3% (Dataset 1). The mid-precordial leads performed best in classification individually, but the highest overall accuracy was achieved with all 12 leads. Classification accuracy was highest for young adults and declined with older age. Conclusions: SPAR allows quantification of the morphology of the ECG without the need to identify conventional fiducial points, whilst utilizing of all the data reduces inadvertent bias. By intuitively re-visualizing signal morphology as two-dimensional images, SPAR accurately discriminated ECG sex differences in a small dataset. We extended the approach to a machine learning classification of sex for a larger dataset, and showed that the SPAR method provided a means of visualizing the similarities of subjects given the same classification. This proof-of-concept study therefore provided an implementation of SPAR using existing data and showed that subtle differences in the ECG can be amplified by the attractor. SPAR's supplementary analysis of ECG morphology may enhance conventional automated analysis in clinically important datasets, and improve patient stratification and risk management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8495026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84950262021-10-08 Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction: Sex Differences in the ECG Lyle, Jane V. Nandi, Manasi Aston, Philip J. Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a key tool in patient management. Automated ECG analysis supports clinical decision-making, but traditional fiducial point identification discards much of the time-series data that captures the morphology of the whole waveform. Our Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction (SPAR) method uses all the available data to provide a new visualization and quantification of the morphology and variability of any approximately periodic signal. We therefore applied SPAR to ECG signals to ascertain whether this more detailed investigation of ECG morphology adds clinical value. Methods: Our aim was to demonstrate the accuracy of the SPAR method in discriminating between two biologically distinct groups. As sex has been shown to influence the waveform appearance, we investigated sex differences in normal sinus rhythm ECGs. We applied the SPAR method to 9,007 10 second 12-lead ECG recordings from Physionet, which comprised; Dataset 1: 104 subjects (40% female), Dataset 2: 8,903 subjects (54% female). Results: SPAR showed clear visual differences between female and male ECGs (Dataset 1). A stacked machine learning model achieved a cross-validation sex classification accuracy of 86.3% (Dataset 2) and an unseen test accuracy of 91.3% (Dataset 1). The mid-precordial leads performed best in classification individually, but the highest overall accuracy was achieved with all 12 leads. Classification accuracy was highest for young adults and declined with older age. Conclusions: SPAR allows quantification of the morphology of the ECG without the need to identify conventional fiducial points, whilst utilizing of all the data reduces inadvertent bias. By intuitively re-visualizing signal morphology as two-dimensional images, SPAR accurately discriminated ECG sex differences in a small dataset. We extended the approach to a machine learning classification of sex for a larger dataset, and showed that the SPAR method provided a means of visualizing the similarities of subjects given the same classification. This proof-of-concept study therefore provided an implementation of SPAR using existing data and showed that subtle differences in the ECG can be amplified by the attractor. SPAR's supplementary analysis of ECG morphology may enhance conventional automated analysis in clinically important datasets, and improve patient stratification and risk management. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8495026/ /pubmed/34631814 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.709457 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lyle, Nandi and Aston. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Lyle, Jane V.
Nandi, Manasi
Aston, Philip J.
Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction: Sex Differences in the ECG
title Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction: Sex Differences in the ECG
title_full Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction: Sex Differences in the ECG
title_fullStr Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction: Sex Differences in the ECG
title_full_unstemmed Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction: Sex Differences in the ECG
title_short Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction: Sex Differences in the ECG
title_sort symmetric projection attractor reconstruction: sex differences in the ecg
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8495026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34631814
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.709457
work_keys_str_mv AT lylejanev symmetricprojectionattractorreconstructionsexdifferencesintheecg
AT nandimanasi symmetricprojectionattractorreconstructionsexdifferencesintheecg
AT astonphilipj symmetricprojectionattractorreconstructionsexdifferencesintheecg