Cargando…

Patient characteristics and acute cardiovascular event rates among patients with very high‐risk and non‐very high‐risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND: The risk for subsequent major cardiovascular (CV) events among patients with very high‐risk (VHR) atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD) remains to be fully elucidated. HYPOTHESIS: We assessed the characteristics and major CV event rates of patients with VHR versus non‐VHR ASCVD in a real‐wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fonarow, Gregg C., Kosiborod, Mikhail N., Rane, Pallavi B., Nunna, Sasikiran, Villa, Guillermo, Habib, Mohdhar, Arellano, Jorge, Mues, Katherine E., Sun, Kainan, Wade, Rolin L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8495090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34351003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23706
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The risk for subsequent major cardiovascular (CV) events among patients with very high‐risk (VHR) atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD) remains to be fully elucidated. HYPOTHESIS: We assessed the characteristics and major CV event rates of patients with VHR versus non‐VHR ASCVD in a real‐world setting in the United States (US), hypothesizing that patients with VHR ASCVD would have higher CV event rates. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted from January 01, 2011, to June 30, 2018, in the US using the Prognos LDL‐C database linked to the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus® database supplemented with the IQVIA prescription claims (Dx/LRx) databases. Patients were ≥18 years old and had  ≥2 non‐ancillary medical claims in the linked databases at least 30 days apart. The study was conducted in 2 stages: (1) identification of patients with ASCVD who met the definition of VHR ASCVD and a matched cohort of non‐VHR ASCVD patients using the incidence density sampling (IDS) approach; (2) estimation of the occurrence of major CV events. RESULTS: Among patients with ≥1 major ASCVD event (N=147,679), most qualified as VHR ASCVD (79.5%). There were 115,460 patients each in IDS‐matched VHR and non‐VHR ASCVD cohorts. The composite myocardial infarction/ischemic stroke event rates in the VHR and non‐VHR ASCVD cohorts were 8.04 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 7.87‐8.22) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77‐0.88) events per 100 patient‐years, respectively, during the 1‐year post‐index period. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with ≥1 previous major ASCVD event treated in real‐world US clinical practice qualified as VHR ASCVD. Patients with VHR ASCVD had much higher rates of major CV events versus non‐VHR ASCVD patients.