Cargando…
Stereotactic and Robotic Minimally Invasive Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic navigation techniques aim to enhance treatment precision and safety in minimally invasive thermal ablation of liver tumors. We qualitatively reviewed and quantitatively summarized the available literature on procedural and clinical outcomes after stereotactic navigated ablat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8495244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34631539 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.713685 |
_version_ | 1784579501852721152 |
---|---|
author | Tinguely, Pascale Paolucci, Iwan Ruiter, Simeon J. S. Weber, Stefan de Jong, Koert P. Candinas, Daniel Freedman, Jacob Engstrand, Jennie |
author_facet | Tinguely, Pascale Paolucci, Iwan Ruiter, Simeon J. S. Weber, Stefan de Jong, Koert P. Candinas, Daniel Freedman, Jacob Engstrand, Jennie |
author_sort | Tinguely, Pascale |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stereotactic navigation techniques aim to enhance treatment precision and safety in minimally invasive thermal ablation of liver tumors. We qualitatively reviewed and quantitatively summarized the available literature on procedural and clinical outcomes after stereotactic navigated ablation of malignant liver tumors. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed on procedural and clinical outcomes when using stereotactic or robotic navigation for laparoscopic or percutaneous thermal ablation. The online databases Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. Endpoints included targeting accuracy, procedural efficiency, and treatment efficacy outcomes. Meta-analysis including subgroup analyses was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies (two randomized controlled trials, three prospective cohort studies, 29 case series) were qualitatively analyzed, and 22 studies were included for meta-analysis. Weighted average lateral targeting error was 3.7 mm (CI 3.2, 4.2), with all four comparative studies showing enhanced targeting accuracy compared to free-hand targeting. Weighted average overall complications, major complications, and mortality were 11.4% (6.7, 16.1), 3.4% (2.1, 5.1), and 0.8% (0.5, 1.3). Pooled estimates of primary technique efficacy were 94% (89, 97) if assessed at 1–6 weeks and 90% (87, 93) if assessed at 6–12 weeks post ablation, with remaining between-study heterogeneity. Primary technique efficacy was significantly enhanced in stereotactic vs. free-hand targeting, with odds ratio (OR) of 1.9 (1.2, 3.2) (n = 6 studies). CONCLUSIONS: Advances in stereotactic navigation technologies allow highly precise and safe tumor targeting, leading to enhanced primary treatment efficacy. The use of varying definitions and terminology of safety and efficacy limits comparability among studies, highlighting the crucial need for further standardization of follow-up definitions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8495244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84952442021-10-08 Stereotactic and Robotic Minimally Invasive Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Tinguely, Pascale Paolucci, Iwan Ruiter, Simeon J. S. Weber, Stefan de Jong, Koert P. Candinas, Daniel Freedman, Jacob Engstrand, Jennie Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Stereotactic navigation techniques aim to enhance treatment precision and safety in minimally invasive thermal ablation of liver tumors. We qualitatively reviewed and quantitatively summarized the available literature on procedural and clinical outcomes after stereotactic navigated ablation of malignant liver tumors. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed on procedural and clinical outcomes when using stereotactic or robotic navigation for laparoscopic or percutaneous thermal ablation. The online databases Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. Endpoints included targeting accuracy, procedural efficiency, and treatment efficacy outcomes. Meta-analysis including subgroup analyses was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies (two randomized controlled trials, three prospective cohort studies, 29 case series) were qualitatively analyzed, and 22 studies were included for meta-analysis. Weighted average lateral targeting error was 3.7 mm (CI 3.2, 4.2), with all four comparative studies showing enhanced targeting accuracy compared to free-hand targeting. Weighted average overall complications, major complications, and mortality were 11.4% (6.7, 16.1), 3.4% (2.1, 5.1), and 0.8% (0.5, 1.3). Pooled estimates of primary technique efficacy were 94% (89, 97) if assessed at 1–6 weeks and 90% (87, 93) if assessed at 6–12 weeks post ablation, with remaining between-study heterogeneity. Primary technique efficacy was significantly enhanced in stereotactic vs. free-hand targeting, with odds ratio (OR) of 1.9 (1.2, 3.2) (n = 6 studies). CONCLUSIONS: Advances in stereotactic navigation technologies allow highly precise and safe tumor targeting, leading to enhanced primary treatment efficacy. The use of varying definitions and terminology of safety and efficacy limits comparability among studies, highlighting the crucial need for further standardization of follow-up definitions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8495244/ /pubmed/34631539 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.713685 Text en Copyright © 2021 Tinguely, Paolucci, Ruiter, Weber, de Jong, Candinas, Freedman and Engstrand https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Tinguely, Pascale Paolucci, Iwan Ruiter, Simeon J. S. Weber, Stefan de Jong, Koert P. Candinas, Daniel Freedman, Jacob Engstrand, Jennie Stereotactic and Robotic Minimally Invasive Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Stereotactic and Robotic Minimally Invasive Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Stereotactic and Robotic Minimally Invasive Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Stereotactic and Robotic Minimally Invasive Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Stereotactic and Robotic Minimally Invasive Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Stereotactic and Robotic Minimally Invasive Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | stereotactic and robotic minimally invasive thermal ablation of malignant liver tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8495244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34631539 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.713685 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tinguelypascale stereotacticandroboticminimallyinvasivethermalablationofmalignantlivertumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT paolucciiwan stereotacticandroboticminimallyinvasivethermalablationofmalignantlivertumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ruitersimeonjs stereotacticandroboticminimallyinvasivethermalablationofmalignantlivertumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT weberstefan stereotacticandroboticminimallyinvasivethermalablationofmalignantlivertumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dejongkoertp stereotacticandroboticminimallyinvasivethermalablationofmalignantlivertumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT candinasdaniel stereotacticandroboticminimallyinvasivethermalablationofmalignantlivertumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT freedmanjacob stereotacticandroboticminimallyinvasivethermalablationofmalignantlivertumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT engstrandjennie stereotacticandroboticminimallyinvasivethermalablationofmalignantlivertumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |