Cargando…
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Web-Based Caregiver Decision Aid (Safety in Dementia) for Firearm Access: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: Firearms are common in the households of persons with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). Safety in Dementia (SiD) is a free web-based decision aid that was developed to support ADRD caregivers in addressing firearm access. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8495566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34550082 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30990 |
_version_ | 1784579581035937792 |
---|---|
author | Betz, Marian E Polzer, Evan Nearing, Kathryn Knoepke, Christopher E Johnson, Rachel L Meador, Lauren Matlock, Daniel D |
author_facet | Betz, Marian E Polzer, Evan Nearing, Kathryn Knoepke, Christopher E Johnson, Rachel L Meador, Lauren Matlock, Daniel D |
author_sort | Betz, Marian E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Firearms are common in the households of persons with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). Safety in Dementia (SiD) is a free web-based decision aid that was developed to support ADRD caregivers in addressing firearm access. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of SiD among a web-based sample of ADRD caregivers. METHODS: SiD was tested in 2 phases by using participants who were recruited from a web-based convenience sample (Amazon Mechanical Turk participants). In phase 1, caregivers were randomized to view either the intervention (SiD) or the control (Alzheimer’s Association materials), and the blinding of participants to the study arms was conducted. In phase 2, caregivers of individuals with ADRD and firearm access were recruited; all of these participants viewed the firearm section of SiD. In both phases, participants viewed SiD independently for as long as they wanted. Measures for evaluating decision-making and SiD acceptability were used, and these were assessed via a self-administered web-based questionnaire. RESULTS: Participants were recruited for phases 1 (n=203) and 2 (n=54). Although it was feasible to collect the study outcome data in a web-based format, in phase 1, there were no significant differences between SiD and the control in terms of decision-making and self-efficacy. The majority (137/203, 67.5%) of phase 1 participants spent between 5 and 10 minutes reviewing the resources. In phase 2, 61% (33/54) of participants spent 5 to 10 minutes viewing the firearm section, and 31% (17/54) spent 10 to 20 minutes viewing this section. Usability and acceptability were high across the phases. CONCLUSIONS: SiD represents a new resource for promoting safety among people with dementia, and high acceptability was achieved in a pilot trial. In this sample, SiD performed similarly to Alzheimer’s Association materials in supporting decision-making and self-efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8495566 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84955662021-11-16 Feasibility and Acceptability of a Web-Based Caregiver Decision Aid (Safety in Dementia) for Firearm Access: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Betz, Marian E Polzer, Evan Nearing, Kathryn Knoepke, Christopher E Johnson, Rachel L Meador, Lauren Matlock, Daniel D JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Firearms are common in the households of persons with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). Safety in Dementia (SiD) is a free web-based decision aid that was developed to support ADRD caregivers in addressing firearm access. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of SiD among a web-based sample of ADRD caregivers. METHODS: SiD was tested in 2 phases by using participants who were recruited from a web-based convenience sample (Amazon Mechanical Turk participants). In phase 1, caregivers were randomized to view either the intervention (SiD) or the control (Alzheimer’s Association materials), and the blinding of participants to the study arms was conducted. In phase 2, caregivers of individuals with ADRD and firearm access were recruited; all of these participants viewed the firearm section of SiD. In both phases, participants viewed SiD independently for as long as they wanted. Measures for evaluating decision-making and SiD acceptability were used, and these were assessed via a self-administered web-based questionnaire. RESULTS: Participants were recruited for phases 1 (n=203) and 2 (n=54). Although it was feasible to collect the study outcome data in a web-based format, in phase 1, there were no significant differences between SiD and the control in terms of decision-making and self-efficacy. The majority (137/203, 67.5%) of phase 1 participants spent between 5 and 10 minutes reviewing the resources. In phase 2, 61% (33/54) of participants spent 5 to 10 minutes viewing the firearm section, and 31% (17/54) spent 10 to 20 minutes viewing this section. Usability and acceptability were high across the phases. CONCLUSIONS: SiD represents a new resource for promoting safety among people with dementia, and high acceptability was achieved in a pilot trial. In this sample, SiD performed similarly to Alzheimer’s Association materials in supporting decision-making and self-efficacy. JMIR Publications 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8495566/ /pubmed/34550082 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30990 Text en ©Marian E Betz, Evan Polzer, Kathryn Nearing, Christopher E Knoepke, Rachel L Johnson, Lauren Meador, Daniel D Matlock. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 22.09.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Betz, Marian E Polzer, Evan Nearing, Kathryn Knoepke, Christopher E Johnson, Rachel L Meador, Lauren Matlock, Daniel D Feasibility and Acceptability of a Web-Based Caregiver Decision Aid (Safety in Dementia) for Firearm Access: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Feasibility and Acceptability of a Web-Based Caregiver Decision Aid (Safety in Dementia) for Firearm Access: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Feasibility and Acceptability of a Web-Based Caregiver Decision Aid (Safety in Dementia) for Firearm Access: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and Acceptability of a Web-Based Caregiver Decision Aid (Safety in Dementia) for Firearm Access: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and Acceptability of a Web-Based Caregiver Decision Aid (Safety in Dementia) for Firearm Access: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Feasibility and Acceptability of a Web-Based Caregiver Decision Aid (Safety in Dementia) for Firearm Access: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | feasibility and acceptability of a web-based caregiver decision aid (safety in dementia) for firearm access: pilot randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8495566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34550082 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30990 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT betzmariane feasibilityandacceptabilityofawebbasedcaregiverdecisionaidsafetyindementiaforfirearmaccesspilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT polzerevan feasibilityandacceptabilityofawebbasedcaregiverdecisionaidsafetyindementiaforfirearmaccesspilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nearingkathryn feasibilityandacceptabilityofawebbasedcaregiverdecisionaidsafetyindementiaforfirearmaccesspilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT knoepkechristophere feasibilityandacceptabilityofawebbasedcaregiverdecisionaidsafetyindementiaforfirearmaccesspilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT johnsonrachell feasibilityandacceptabilityofawebbasedcaregiverdecisionaidsafetyindementiaforfirearmaccesspilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT meadorlauren feasibilityandacceptabilityofawebbasedcaregiverdecisionaidsafetyindementiaforfirearmaccesspilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT matlockdanield feasibilityandacceptabilityofawebbasedcaregiverdecisionaidsafetyindementiaforfirearmaccesspilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial |