Cargando…

Control of Sulfate and Nitrate Reduction by Setting Hydraulic Retention Time and Applied Potential on a Membraneless Microbial Electrolysis Cell for Perchloroethylene Removal

[Image: see text] A membraneless microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) has been developed for perchloroethylene (PCE) removal through the reductive dechlorination reaction. The MEC consists of a tubular reactor of 8.24 L equipped with a graphite-granule working electrode which stimulates dechlorinating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dell’Armi, Edoardo, Zeppilli, Marco, De Santis, Federica, Petrangeli Papini, Marco, Majone, Mauro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8495709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34632180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c03001
Descripción
Sumario:[Image: see text] A membraneless microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) has been developed for perchloroethylene (PCE) removal through the reductive dechlorination reaction. The MEC consists of a tubular reactor of 8.24 L equipped with a graphite-granule working electrode which stimulates dechlorinating microorganisms while a graphite-granule cylindrical envelopment contained in a plastic mesh constituted the counter electrode of the MEC. Synthetic PCE-contaminated groundwater has been used as the feeding solution to test the nitrate and sulfate reduction reactions on the MEC performance at different hydraulic retention times (HRTs) (4.1, 1.8, and 1.2) and different cathodic potentials [−350, −450, and −650 mV vs standard hydrogen electrode (SHE)]. The HRT decrease from 4.1 to 1.8 d promoted a considerable increase in sulfate removal from 38 ± 11 to 113 ± 26 mg/Ld with a consequent current increase, while a shorter HRT of 1.2 d caused a partial inhibition of sulfate reduction with a consequent current decrease from −99 ± 3 to −52 ± 6 mA. Similarly, the cathodic potential investigation showed a direct correlation of current generation and sulfate removal in which the utilization of a cathodic potential of −350 mV versus SHE allowed for an 80% decrease in the sulfate removal rate with a consequent current decrease from −163 ± 7 to 41 ± 5 mA. The study showed the possibility to mitigate the energy consumption of the process by avoiding side reactions and current generation, through the selection of an appropriate HRT and applied cathodic potential.