Cargando…
A problem with variable selection in a comparison of correlative and process‐based species distribution models: Comments on Higgins et al., 2020
Comments are presented on an article published in October 2020 in Ecology and Evolution (“Predictive ability of a process‐based versus a correlative species distribution model”) by Higgins et al. This analyzed natural distributions of Australian eucalypt and acacia species and assessed the adventive...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8495777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34646494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7496 |
_version_ | 1784579615678791680 |
---|---|
author | Booth, Trevor H. |
author_facet | Booth, Trevor H. |
author_sort | Booth, Trevor H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Comments are presented on an article published in October 2020 in Ecology and Evolution (“Predictive ability of a process‐based versus a correlative species distribution model”) by Higgins et al. This analyzed natural distributions of Australian eucalypt and acacia species and assessed the adventive range of selected species outside Australia. Unfortunately, inappropriate variables were used with the MaxEnt species distribution model outside Australia, so that large climatically suitable areas in the Northern Hemisphere were not identified. Examples from a previous analysis and from the use of the freely available spatial portal of the Atlas of Living Australia are provided to illustrate how the problem can be overcome. The comparison of methods described in the Higgins et al. paper is worthwhile, and it is hoped that the authors will be able to repeat their analyses using appropriate variables with the correlative model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8495777 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84957772021-10-12 A problem with variable selection in a comparison of correlative and process‐based species distribution models: Comments on Higgins et al., 2020 Booth, Trevor H. Ecol Evol Letters to the Editor Comments are presented on an article published in October 2020 in Ecology and Evolution (“Predictive ability of a process‐based versus a correlative species distribution model”) by Higgins et al. This analyzed natural distributions of Australian eucalypt and acacia species and assessed the adventive range of selected species outside Australia. Unfortunately, inappropriate variables were used with the MaxEnt species distribution model outside Australia, so that large climatically suitable areas in the Northern Hemisphere were not identified. Examples from a previous analysis and from the use of the freely available spatial portal of the Atlas of Living Australia are provided to illustrate how the problem can be overcome. The comparison of methods described in the Higgins et al. paper is worthwhile, and it is hoped that the authors will be able to repeat their analyses using appropriate variables with the correlative model. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8495777/ /pubmed/34646494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7496 Text en © 2021 CSIRO. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Letters to the Editor Booth, Trevor H. A problem with variable selection in a comparison of correlative and process‐based species distribution models: Comments on Higgins et al., 2020 |
title | A problem with variable selection in a comparison of correlative and process‐based species distribution models: Comments on Higgins et al., 2020 |
title_full | A problem with variable selection in a comparison of correlative and process‐based species distribution models: Comments on Higgins et al., 2020 |
title_fullStr | A problem with variable selection in a comparison of correlative and process‐based species distribution models: Comments on Higgins et al., 2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | A problem with variable selection in a comparison of correlative and process‐based species distribution models: Comments on Higgins et al., 2020 |
title_short | A problem with variable selection in a comparison of correlative and process‐based species distribution models: Comments on Higgins et al., 2020 |
title_sort | problem with variable selection in a comparison of correlative and process‐based species distribution models: comments on higgins et al., 2020 |
topic | Letters to the Editor |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8495777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34646494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7496 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boothtrevorh aproblemwithvariableselectioninacomparisonofcorrelativeandprocessbasedspeciesdistributionmodelscommentsonhigginsetal2020 AT boothtrevorh problemwithvariableselectioninacomparisonofcorrelativeandprocessbasedspeciesdistributionmodelscommentsonhigginsetal2020 |