Cargando…

On the use of GBLUP and its extension for GWAS with additive and epistatic effects

Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) is the most widely used model for genome-wide predictions. Interestingly, it is also possible to perform genome-wide association studies (GWAS) based on GBLUP. Although the estimated marker effects in GBLUP are shrunken and the conventional test based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jie, Liu, Fang, Reif, Jochen C, Jiang, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8495923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33871030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkab122
_version_ 1784579650235662336
author Zhang, Jie
Liu, Fang
Reif, Jochen C
Jiang, Yong
author_facet Zhang, Jie
Liu, Fang
Reif, Jochen C
Jiang, Yong
author_sort Zhang, Jie
collection PubMed
description Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) is the most widely used model for genome-wide predictions. Interestingly, it is also possible to perform genome-wide association studies (GWAS) based on GBLUP. Although the estimated marker effects in GBLUP are shrunken and the conventional test based on such effects has low power, it was observed that a modified test statistic can be produced and the result of test was identical to a standard GWAS model. Later, a mathematical proof was given for the special case that there is no fixed covariate in GBLUP. Since then, the new approach has been called “GWAS by GBLUP”. Nevertheless, covariates such as environmental and subpopulation effects are very common in GBLUP. Thus, it is necessary to confirm the equivalence in the general case. Recently, the concept was generalized to GWAS for epistatic effects and the new approach was termed rapid epistatic mixed-model association analysis (REMMA) because it greatly improved the computational efficiency. However, the relationship between REMMA and the standard GWAS model has not been investigated. In this study, we first provided a general mathematical proof of the equivalence between “GWAS by GBLUP” and the standard GWAS model for additive effects. Then, we compared REMMA with the standard GWAS model for epistatic effects by a theoretical investigation and by empirical data analyses. We hypothesized that the similarity of the two models is influenced by the relative contribution of additive and epistatic effects to the phenotypic variance, which was verified by empirical and simulation studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8495923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84959232021-10-07 On the use of GBLUP and its extension for GWAS with additive and epistatic effects Zhang, Jie Liu, Fang Reif, Jochen C Jiang, Yong G3 (Bethesda) Investigation Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) is the most widely used model for genome-wide predictions. Interestingly, it is also possible to perform genome-wide association studies (GWAS) based on GBLUP. Although the estimated marker effects in GBLUP are shrunken and the conventional test based on such effects has low power, it was observed that a modified test statistic can be produced and the result of test was identical to a standard GWAS model. Later, a mathematical proof was given for the special case that there is no fixed covariate in GBLUP. Since then, the new approach has been called “GWAS by GBLUP”. Nevertheless, covariates such as environmental and subpopulation effects are very common in GBLUP. Thus, it is necessary to confirm the equivalence in the general case. Recently, the concept was generalized to GWAS for epistatic effects and the new approach was termed rapid epistatic mixed-model association analysis (REMMA) because it greatly improved the computational efficiency. However, the relationship between REMMA and the standard GWAS model has not been investigated. In this study, we first provided a general mathematical proof of the equivalence between “GWAS by GBLUP” and the standard GWAS model for additive effects. Then, we compared REMMA with the standard GWAS model for epistatic effects by a theoretical investigation and by empirical data analyses. We hypothesized that the similarity of the two models is influenced by the relative contribution of additive and epistatic effects to the phenotypic variance, which was verified by empirical and simulation studies. Oxford University Press 2021-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8495923/ /pubmed/33871030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkab122 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Investigation
Zhang, Jie
Liu, Fang
Reif, Jochen C
Jiang, Yong
On the use of GBLUP and its extension for GWAS with additive and epistatic effects
title On the use of GBLUP and its extension for GWAS with additive and epistatic effects
title_full On the use of GBLUP and its extension for GWAS with additive and epistatic effects
title_fullStr On the use of GBLUP and its extension for GWAS with additive and epistatic effects
title_full_unstemmed On the use of GBLUP and its extension for GWAS with additive and epistatic effects
title_short On the use of GBLUP and its extension for GWAS with additive and epistatic effects
title_sort on the use of gblup and its extension for gwas with additive and epistatic effects
topic Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8495923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33871030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkab122
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjie ontheuseofgblupanditsextensionforgwaswithadditiveandepistaticeffects
AT liufang ontheuseofgblupanditsextensionforgwaswithadditiveandepistaticeffects
AT reifjochenc ontheuseofgblupanditsextensionforgwaswithadditiveandepistaticeffects
AT jiangyong ontheuseofgblupanditsextensionforgwaswithadditiveandepistaticeffects