Cargando…

Considerations for designing and implementing a surgical peer coaching program: an international survey

BACKGROUND: Surgical peer coaching has been associated with high rates of practice change but remains largely unutilized. The purpose of this study was to survey surgeons internationally to investigate attitudes regarding peer coaching and to identify any international differences to inform the desi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valanci-Aroesty, Sofia, Feldman, Liane S., Fiore, Julio F., Lee, Lawrence, Fried, Gerald M., Mueller, Carmen L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34622299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08760-z
_version_ 1784579871420186624
author Valanci-Aroesty, Sofia
Feldman, Liane S.
Fiore, Julio F.
Lee, Lawrence
Fried, Gerald M.
Mueller, Carmen L.
author_facet Valanci-Aroesty, Sofia
Feldman, Liane S.
Fiore, Julio F.
Lee, Lawrence
Fried, Gerald M.
Mueller, Carmen L.
author_sort Valanci-Aroesty, Sofia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical peer coaching has been associated with high rates of practice change but remains largely unutilized. The purpose of this study was to survey surgeons internationally to investigate attitudes regarding peer coaching and to identify any international differences to inform the design of future coaching programs. METHODS: Practicing surgeons in general surgery or related subspecialties were eligible to participate. Invitations to complete the survey were distributed through 13 surgical associations, social media, and personal e-mail invitations. Responses were obtained between June 1st and August 31st, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 521 surveys were collected. The majority of participants practiced in North America (263; 50%) with remaining respondents from Asia (81; 16%), Europe (34;7%), South America (21; 4%), Africa (17; 3%), and Oceania (6; 1%). Duration of practice was equally distributed across 4 intervals (0–5 years; 6–15 years; 16–25 years; > 25 years). Respondents most frequently identified as general surgeons (290; 67%) and 325 (75%) were male. Awareness of peer coaching was reported by 275 (53%) respondents, with 197 (44%) never seeking formal feedback from peers. The majority of respondents (372; 84%) would be willing to participate in a peer coaching program, with monthly interactions the most desirable frequency reported (193; 51%). Coaching in the operating room was preferred by most participants (360; 86%). Few respondents (67; 14%) would accept coaching from someone unknown to them. Participants identified key coaching program elements as: feedback kept private and confidential (267; 63%); opportunity to provide feedback to the coach (247; 59%); personalized goal setting (244; 58%); and the option to choose one’s own coach (205; 49%). The most commonly cited potential barrier to participation was logistical constraints (334; 79%). CONCLUSION: This international survey of practicing surgeons demonstrated that peer feedback is rarely used in practice, but there is high interest and acceptance of the peer coaching model for continuous professional development. Findings regarding preferred program structure may be useful to inform the design of future peer coaching programs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08760-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8497045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84970452021-10-08 Considerations for designing and implementing a surgical peer coaching program: an international survey Valanci-Aroesty, Sofia Feldman, Liane S. Fiore, Julio F. Lee, Lawrence Fried, Gerald M. Mueller, Carmen L. Surg Endosc 2021 SAGES Poster BACKGROUND: Surgical peer coaching has been associated with high rates of practice change but remains largely unutilized. The purpose of this study was to survey surgeons internationally to investigate attitudes regarding peer coaching and to identify any international differences to inform the design of future coaching programs. METHODS: Practicing surgeons in general surgery or related subspecialties were eligible to participate. Invitations to complete the survey were distributed through 13 surgical associations, social media, and personal e-mail invitations. Responses were obtained between June 1st and August 31st, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 521 surveys were collected. The majority of participants practiced in North America (263; 50%) with remaining respondents from Asia (81; 16%), Europe (34;7%), South America (21; 4%), Africa (17; 3%), and Oceania (6; 1%). Duration of practice was equally distributed across 4 intervals (0–5 years; 6–15 years; 16–25 years; > 25 years). Respondents most frequently identified as general surgeons (290; 67%) and 325 (75%) were male. Awareness of peer coaching was reported by 275 (53%) respondents, with 197 (44%) never seeking formal feedback from peers. The majority of respondents (372; 84%) would be willing to participate in a peer coaching program, with monthly interactions the most desirable frequency reported (193; 51%). Coaching in the operating room was preferred by most participants (360; 86%). Few respondents (67; 14%) would accept coaching from someone unknown to them. Participants identified key coaching program elements as: feedback kept private and confidential (267; 63%); opportunity to provide feedback to the coach (247; 59%); personalized goal setting (244; 58%); and the option to choose one’s own coach (205; 49%). The most commonly cited potential barrier to participation was logistical constraints (334; 79%). CONCLUSION: This international survey of practicing surgeons demonstrated that peer feedback is rarely used in practice, but there is high interest and acceptance of the peer coaching model for continuous professional development. Findings regarding preferred program structure may be useful to inform the design of future peer coaching programs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08760-z. Springer US 2021-10-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8497045/ /pubmed/34622299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08760-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle 2021 SAGES Poster
Valanci-Aroesty, Sofia
Feldman, Liane S.
Fiore, Julio F.
Lee, Lawrence
Fried, Gerald M.
Mueller, Carmen L.
Considerations for designing and implementing a surgical peer coaching program: an international survey
title Considerations for designing and implementing a surgical peer coaching program: an international survey
title_full Considerations for designing and implementing a surgical peer coaching program: an international survey
title_fullStr Considerations for designing and implementing a surgical peer coaching program: an international survey
title_full_unstemmed Considerations for designing and implementing a surgical peer coaching program: an international survey
title_short Considerations for designing and implementing a surgical peer coaching program: an international survey
title_sort considerations for designing and implementing a surgical peer coaching program: an international survey
topic 2021 SAGES Poster
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34622299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08760-z
work_keys_str_mv AT valanciaroestysofia considerationsfordesigningandimplementingasurgicalpeercoachingprogramaninternationalsurvey
AT feldmanlianes considerationsfordesigningandimplementingasurgicalpeercoachingprogramaninternationalsurvey
AT fiorejuliof considerationsfordesigningandimplementingasurgicalpeercoachingprogramaninternationalsurvey
AT leelawrence considerationsfordesigningandimplementingasurgicalpeercoachingprogramaninternationalsurvey
AT friedgeraldm considerationsfordesigningandimplementingasurgicalpeercoachingprogramaninternationalsurvey
AT muellercarmenl considerationsfordesigningandimplementingasurgicalpeercoachingprogramaninternationalsurvey